Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5215 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yeah man, they are easy to hit. The trajectory is amazing, the shafts having a role of course. I have always hit a very high ball. The trajectory with these Miura's is more penetrating. The feel is the big thing for me, pure butter. Hot butter. This is the first time I have ever been able to say that my clubs made me a better golfer.

-Dan


Posted


Originally Posted by kctay

Number one, it wasn't condescending (I know what my intent was, I said it), it was a completely innocent comment based on observations made throughout my 40+ years of playing golf (no, I'm not an 11yo).  Number two it wasn't "everyone's" take either.  You started a feeding frenzy with "the new guy".  Apparently personal opinions are not encouraged here, but rather demonized, and distorted.

I still stand by what I said, furthermore, I don't think going to a forged iron will benefit the majority of high handicappers, that is my opinion based on playing with a variety of players.



Ignorance will be more likely tolerated than a lack of candor.

Perhaps with your 40 years of .... you should tell the OP what you think about his question.

I didn't buy my Miura's for your pleasure. Matters not what you think about them (or me).

This has become a distraction to the guys question and I apologize for my part. I was just showing him another option, something else to consider.

-Dan


Posted


Originally Posted by inthehole

I think everyone's take on your comment is that it came across as condescending, myself included.


Number one, it wasn't condescending (I know what my intent was, I said it), it was a completely innocent comment based on observations made throughout my 40+ years of playing golf (no, I'm not an 11yo).  Number two it wasn't "everyone's" take either.  You started a feeding frenzy with "the new guy".  Apparently personal opinions are not encouraged here, but rather demonized, and distorted.

I still stand by what I said, furthermore, I don't think going to a forged iron will benefit the majority of high handicappers, that is my opinion based on playing with a variety of players.


Posted


Originally Posted by Dewdman42

After quite a few years with my Taylor Made RAC HT's, I'm finally ready for some new irons, mainly because I want better shafts.  Trying to decide whether I should get so called "Players's" irons or not.  I have found that when I try some of them out, they can feel great, but I'm not sure whether or not I will be killing myself on a bad day wishing I have some kind of moderate game improvement iron.  I know for sure I don't want or need extreme game improvement irons.

My hc is around 15, particularly iron play (around the green is my weakness at the moment).

I have spent the past few years heavily focused on trying to improve my swing, many lessons, many trips to the range.  And my swing has indeed improved a lot.  I'm not sure that penalizing my mis hits with harshness to my hands is going to make any difference to my improvement.  I'm already obsessed with practice and improvement.

Most of the time I am also not really trying to "shape" my shots, though occasionally I do attempt a draw or cut shot, most often not very successfully.  Is that because my RAC's just don't respond well to that? I also rarely get the ball to roll backwards on the green.  Is that where the players irons would reward me with good hits?  Are player's irons more likely to have consistent distance (assuming pure shots)?

I'm thinking of the Titleist AP1 or AP2, and also considering some kind of Mizuno or perhaps Taylor mades, but I don't like the Taylormade Burner frankenstein, too non-standard for my blood.  I want to get straight up irons with no special secret tricks....and particularly I don't want something designed to send the ball higher then normal or further than normal.  But perhaps a bit more forgiving on mishits then the full on blade.   I will be customizing the shafts in any case.

I would appreciate any feedback about player's irons versus GI irons, and perhaps some suggestions about specific models which are somewhat forgiving but still able to work the ball a bit.


Let's get back on topic guys.


Posted


Originally Posted by Danattherock

Yeah man, they are easy to hit. The trajectory is amazing, the shafts having a role of course. I have always hit a very high ball. The trajectory with these Miura's is more penetrating. The feel is the big thing for me, pure butter. Hot butter. This is the first time I have ever been able to say that my clubs made me a better golfer.

-Dan


The only thing I can add is the "buttery feel" theory is in your head but that's ok if it gives you more confidence. If you have 2 different irons one cast and forged you hit them both solid you wouldn't be able to tell the difference. I went from MP57(forged) to S57(cast) and the cast doesn't feel different, it's great when hit good and terrible when hit bad which was how my MP57s felt. Which is why I also think it makes no difference if you get forged or cast plus you got a nice a set enjoy them.

Driver: i15, 3 wood: G10, Hybrid: Nickent 4dx, Irons: Ping s57, Wedges: Mizuno MPT 52, 56, 60, Putter: XG #9 

Posted


Originally Posted by clubchamp

The only thing I can add is the "buttery feel" theory is in your head but that's ok if it gives you more confidence. If you have 2 different irons one cast and forged you hit them both solid you wouldn't be able to tell the difference. I went from MP57(forged) to S57(cast) and the cast doesn't feel different, it's great when hit good and terrible when hit bad which was how my MP57s felt. Which is why I also think it makes no difference if you get forged or cast plus you got a nice a set enjoy them.


This confuses me. It's well documented that 'feel' is over-whelmingly sound based and from a personal perspective the sound difference between cast and forged clubs is fairly easy to hear. That's also the reason Mizuno spend so much on creating the correct sound for their clubs.

You can even find demonstration videos of it:

SWING DNA
Speed [77] Tempo [5] ToeDown [5] KickAngle [6] Release [5] Mizuno JPX EZ 10.5° - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye (with Harrison ShotMaker) Mizuno JPX EZ 3W/3H - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 4i-PW - True Temper XP 115 S300 Mizuno MP R-12 50.06/54.09/58.10 - Dynamic Gold Wedge Flex Mizuno MP A305 [:-P]


Posted

If forging has anything to do with scoring PING would be a trivia question, and Hogan would be Calloway's premier brand.

If brand XYZ were clearly superior to all the others what pro in their right mind would play anything else?

What makes me mad is when others try to pigeon hole somebody into a club without allowing them to even try to see if another club is beyond them.

"Quick Dorthy....the oil can!"


Posted

My experience I started out with a crappy set of irons.  They got me going, and I improved and learned with them to a point.  I felt I got to a point where I plateaued with what I was working with.  I then went to Ping Eye 2 irons and they helped me tremendously given where I was in my golf journey.  I got better spin, an ability to turn iron shots left, and to hit them high.  They improved distance and consistency in distance through the set compared to my old crappolas.  I, again, improved to a point and then felt I not only plateaued, but that the characteristics of the irons were hurting me.  Then I went to the Golden Ram Tour Grind forged muscle backs.  I actually bought them to practice ball striking with and then fell in love with them.  They helped me control trajectory and turn the ball either direction.  I gave up some distance to the pings, but as long as I know what distance I hit each iron what difference does it make what number is on the bottom.  I found it forced me to concentrate more.  As I am getting older, perhaps a set somewhere in the middle (much like the miuras shown above) would give me the best balance between both worlds.

So, based on my personal experience, I believe there is a lot of merit in the theory that you may reach certain plateaus with your irons and need to change in order to get to the next level.  Get a set and just start working with them.  Perhaps try just replacing the shorter irons at first and work your way into the middle and longer irons.

The most difficult distance in golf is the six inches between your ears.


Posted



Originally Posted by Danattherock

Yeah man, they are easy to hit. The trajectory is amazing, the shafts having a role of course. I have always hit a very high ball. The trajectory with these Miura's is more penetrating. The feel is the big thing for me, pure butter. Hot butter. This is the first time I have ever been able to say that my clubs made me a better golfer.

-Dan


Nothing wrong with owning beautiful things - Yamada putters, Miura irons. But let's not give them characteristics that one usually only finds in marketing gibberish, like the "Passing Point" mumbo jumbo from Miura  - God - what a thing to plough through. It's the same old cliches - "butter", "penetrating ballflight", "feel". There is not a club known to man that isn't at least two of these when hit in the middle.  The one I am ruling out is the "penetrating ball flight one". That is a function of power and the right shaft. Not something which is attributable to a club know pretty much as one of the most expensive money can buy. Those, along with the Yamada will get you some knowing smirks unless you have serious, serious game - but, hey, gorgeous things. Let's not try to quantify emotion, though. Especially that which accompanies a serious cash outlay.


In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted


Originally Posted by BugDude

Perhaps try just replacing the shorter irons at first and work your way into the middle and longer irons.



That is what I did as well when I got three Miura wedges last year. Incredible feel and blew the vokeys and cleveland wedges I had been using out of the water. The difference in these wedges is what made me consider Miura irons.

Anyone that says a cast club feels the same as a forged club got ripped off. These Miura irons are ten fold better than the other irons (all cast) I have played. The feel at impact is totally different, butter as folks say, and it is day and night compared to the solid shots I have hit with other irons. I can't compare Miura to other forged irons, but there is a distinct difference to what I have played in the past (Callaway Big Berthas and X20 Tours). Apples to oranges.

-Dan


Posted


Originally Posted by Shorty

Nothing wrong with owning beautiful things - Yamada putters, Miura irons. But let's not give them characteristics that one usually only finds in marketing gibberish, like the "Passing Point" mumbo jumbo from Miura  - God - what a thing to plough through. It's the same old cliches - "butter", "penetrating ballflight", "feel". There is not a club known to man that isn't at least two of these when hit in the middle.  The one I am ruling out is the "penetrating ball flight one". That is a function of power and the right shaft. Not something which is attributable to a club know pretty much as one of the most expensive money can buy. Those, along with the Yamada will get you some knowing smirks unless you have serious, serious game - but, hey, gorgeous things. Let's not try to quantify emotion, though. Especially that which accompanies a serious cash outlay.



I will speak of my irons any way that I please. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder of course. These irons are special and I don't expect folks reading my "gibberish" to understand or believe that. I could care less and hope you guys enjoy hitting what ever you own. Lots of great clubs out there. I found what I like apparently and hope the same for others. I don't buy irons based on how they look unlike many folks. I have owned just a few sets of irons (all used) in 20 years. I can't understand why it offends some folks that I am excited about the first set of new irons I ever bought and they are incredible. This thread is all stocked up on personality flaws. I had two Miura demo clubs sent to me, one was BUTTER, and I ordered a set. The penetrating ball flight must be effected by the club head. My X20 tours had Project X 6.0 and I hit them very high. The Miura demo had a tt stiff shaft and was more boring, but still high by most standards. The clubs ordered have Nippon super peening blue stiff shafts and they are in fact a penetrating flight. If the club head had nothing to do with this, why would the Project X 6.0 shafts be so much higher. Makes no sense to say the club head had nothing to do with trajectory. None.

-Dan


  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by Danattherock

Anyone that says a cast club feels the same as a forged club got ripped off.


The process by which they're made is pretty irrelevant. The actual steel used and the shape of the clubs matters, but the process by which that particular metal is formed into that particular shape is largely irrelevant. There have been tests and studies.

I currently have Miuras as well, and they feel great. No disagreement there. Just that if I were somehow able to replace your clubs with identical ones created by casting you wouldn't know.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

And that softer steel can be cast and have the same performance characteristics?

If so, why does a forged club exist in the first place?

What is the benefit?

At what stage in the forging is the butter added?

That can't be done in casting I guess.

-Dan


Posted

SWING DNA
Speed [77] Tempo [5] ToeDown [5] KickAngle [6] Release [5] Mizuno JPX EZ 10.5° - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye (with Harrison ShotMaker) Mizuno JPX EZ 3W/3H - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 4i-PW - True Temper XP 115 S300 Mizuno MP R-12 50.06/54.09/58.10 - Dynamic Gold Wedge Flex Mizuno MP A305 [:-P]


Posted

Thanks for the link man, interesting thread.

Seems quite obvious that feel is a very subjective thing at best. Certainly explains why folks opinions on putters and irons vary so much. What one person considers "x" another perceives as "y". That being said, every "What is the best..." thread about golf is simply destined to become a Ford/Chevy or PC/Mac conversation. I will need some beer to continue enjoying this thread.

-Dan


  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by Danattherock

Seems quite obvious that feel is a very subjective thing at best. Certainly explains why folks opinions on putters and irons vary so much. What one person considers "x" another perceives as "y". That being said, every "What is the best..." thread about golf is simply destined to become a Ford/Chevy or PC/Mac conversation. I will need some beer to continue enjoying this thread.


More here too: http://thesandtrap.com/t/1358/master-forged-vs-cast-or-blade-vs-game-improvement-iron-thread .

Feel is something like 95% sound (and, arguably, the shaft and grip). Very little has to do with the clubhead.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Man, you got a great sense of humor

I don't need to read a 1,191 post thread to know that my Miura's feel great.

I could tell the first time I took them to the range.

Must have been the sound. The sound of butter??

In your Miura review, you mentioned the feel in your hands. I can see where sound matters a good bit, but like you, a lot of what I perceive as feel is also in my hands. The combination of tactile and auditory = feel? Yep, I can buy into that. Great review by the way. I had read that a while back when searching online for info about Miura in general. That is also when I found out Tiger and others have Miura irons with their sponsors (Nike, Titleist, etc..) logo on them.

http://thesandtrap.com/b/clubs/miura_cb-501_and_blade_2007_irons_review

"I've always been a fan of clubs that do a good job of transferring enough feel to my hands that I know where I hit the ball on the face. If I'm heeling the ball a little, I'd like to know, and both clubs do a fine job of sharing that feedback with me. The slightly softer feeling KBS Tour shaft helps to filter off any excessive vibrations and smooth things out, yielding what to me is the best of both worlds: precise information without harsh feedback."

-Dan


Posted

I don't accept the premise that feel is only about sound.  I can DEFINITELY feel something really nice in my hands when I hit mizunos compared to other irons, off the shelf with no fancy shafts.  Does the sound contribute, absolutely but its not only the sound.  The vibration characteristics of the club are what influence the sound and undeniably would effect feel in your hand as well.

An awful lot of people have attested for years that forged feel better then cast, there is no point in debating how or why they feel better, but countless people seem to feel they do.  I suspect that the Miuras feel awesome to Danattherock because he never hit forged irons before.

Some of the arrogant comments from some of the folks on this thread are astounding.  Suggesting that high handicappers should find a new hobby is utter arrogance.  I'm dissapointed to see that kind of suggestion here.  Golf is for anyone and everyone that enjoys to wack the ball around the course, including ultra high handicappers.  And ultra high handicappers can use any clubs they bloody well please for any reason they prefer.

Titliest AP2 712 irons 9-5, Rescue R9 (3,4, sometimes 5), R9 460 driver, R9 3W

Vokey Wedges 48,52,56,60

Scotty Cameron Fastback 1

Taylor Made Penta balls

Callaway rangefinder


Note: This thread is 5215 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have been debating getting a launch monitor of some sort, if only so I can re-figure my shot zones (I haven't actually mapped them in years) and also to practice distance wedges at home.  I have to see if this works with either my current setup, or what my setup would be if I move it to the garage.  
    • Day 48, June 23.  After work today, I took 25 minutes in my practice room;  6-iron, same everything as yesterday except the time and count. 
    • Well, this is interesting.  I think we discovered a few months ago that I haven't been following professional golf in a while (my confusion about Scotty's footwork confirmed that), so at least as I aim to follow a bit more I'll get something new to learn with all of you.  My very quick read of Erik's summary makes me think this new Challenger series fits somewhere between Korn Ferry and the Championship (not Champions, but I know I'm going to make that mistake a few times if I'm not careful!).   My recollection is that there were already second-tier events among the PGA Tour;  the Bob Hope didn't have the same quality of field as the event at Riviera (whose current name I forget, although now that I say that, I realize the Palm Springs event hasn't been called the Bob Hope in a few years either).   With the absence of the FedEx (if I'm reading that correctly), does that mean no more FedEx Cup at all? Hopefully I'll have time later in 2026 to sit down and see what we're in for in 2027, where one of my goals already is to follow more professional golf.
    • The highlights as I see them: Championship and Challenger Series The creation of the PGA Tour and the PGB Tour, in the words of Joel Dahmen a few years ago. They're calling them the Championship Series (23-24 events) and the Challenger Series (20+ events). Both run February to August. They feel this will achieve three things: increasing the consistency and quality of fields across the season creating a clear system for players to earn and retain status and delivering a more structured and competitive experience for fans and partners—all in an effort to strengthen meritocracy. Championship Series Structure and Eligibility The 23-24 events includes the Players, majors, season-ending events, and the Presidents Cup and Ryder Cup. These will be 72-hole events with a 36-hole cut to the top 65 and ties and purses of $20M+. 120 players without an alternate list. 90 players (roughly) from the previous year and 20 players promoted from the Challenger Series. Full eligibility will be finalized later this year. Sites (cities) to be finalized soon, but 10 of the 15 courses have already been determined. Postseason: includes retention and relegation and concludes with match play. The Tour Championship will also be played across a rotation of prestigious courses. Challenger Series Structure and Eligibility 20+ events. Running concurrently. Will feature players fighting their way back to the Championship Series or players graduating and on the upswing from the Korn Ferry Tour. Many of these events will be current PGA Tour courses. About 7 of the Challenger Series events will be during off weeks for the Championship Series with elevated purses and visibility. Purses of at least $4M, with cuts similar to the Champ series. 144 player fields. Competitive Fields for Both Series Players will be eligible for only one series at a time: Championship Series Players are not eligible for Challenger Series events. Championship Series members will have a known schedule with all events having the same eligibility. Players and Majors will have their own eligibility criteria. Championship Series players don't have to play all events. This begs the question about, say, the Canadian Open, and other "home-town" events that players might want to play, even if they're Challenger Series events. Will releases be granted? Promotion and Relegation At least 90 players will be retained in the Championship Series, and 20 players will be promoted from the Challenger Series each year. Battlefield promotion for two-time winners from the Challenger Series. Players relegated from the Championship Series will have a "last chance" opportunity to retain status, or will go to the Challenger Series. Criteria will be finalized before the start of the 2027 season. Points System New points system (not FedExCup points). Separate points systems for the Championship and Challenger Series. Elevated points in the Challenger Series for off-weeks on the Championship Series. More details tk. Elevated International Events in the Fall The fall schedule will include a limited series of elevated international events with top players from the Championship Series, with the intent to deliver in partnership with the DP World Tour as part of the Strategic Alliance. Last Chance Series The Tour will develop a “last chance” series of 4-6 events in the fall, with a limited number of spots on the Championship Series available for top finishers. Eligibility will include players relegated from the Championship Series, Challenger Series players, and other categories to be determined. Q-School continues, as do the Korn Ferry Tour and PGA Tour Latinoamerica. Also, Brian Rolapp is the new commissioner as of January 1, 2027.
    • You can download the PDF at this link or see the first page of it above.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.