Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6793 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Why are there different shaft lengths for different clubs? Obviously I understand the different lofts. But why vary the shaft lengths? Seems to me if a 9 iron shaft was the same as a 3 iron shaft it would be much easier to produce a consistent swing. As a matter fact I was surfing around and found a club maker (1-Iron, I think), anyway just curious if there is a good reason or what the logic is or is it more tradition than anything?

Posted
If I'm not mistaken, the simple answer is: clubhead speed. The longer the shaft, the greater the velocity at the end of the shaft (where the clubhead is). A 3-iron with a 9-iron length shaft would be a considerably shorter hitter, and a 9-iron with a long shaft would travel farther (and higher).

Bag It:

3-Wood Wishon 525 F/D, 13*, Matrix Studio 65gm, Golf Pride Dual Compound
Hybrid: Wishon "321", 24*, MSF 85 HB, Winn DSI
Irons: Wishon 770CFE, Matrix Studio 74gm, Winn DSI

Putter: Odyssey DFX 2-Ball

Bag: Some big, honkin', ridiculous overkill of an Ogio cart bag with more pockets than I have teeth.


Posted
If I'm not mistaken, the simple answer is: clubhead speed. The longer the shaft, the greater the velocity at the end of the shaft (where the clubhead is). A 3-iron with a 9-iron length shaft would be a considerably shorter hitter, and a 9-iron with a long shaft would travel farther (and higher).

You are correct that longer shafts can help increase clubhead speed. Total weight of the club, amount of weight in the clubhead are also factors. Yardage gaps in medium and short irons could probably be accomplished easily by loft changes, keeping shaft length and clubweights equal. Long irons and woods would be tougher. You could easily design a set with just 3 lengths. Short for 5i to lw. Medium for 4i to 3w and long for the driver. You might sacrifice some distance in the 3w, but consistency and accuracy might improve. Tommy Armour had a set called EQL? a few years back that tried this with the irons, wasn't very successful.

1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow


Posted
Your question about shaft lengths is common. Originally all shafts were the same length, and all the clubs were custom built. In order to mass produce clubs, companies began making them in 1/2" increments. The thinking was that a person could buy a set of clubs for a lower price and likely one or two of the clubs within the set would fit. The 1 Iron theory is that all the clubs are the same length and weight, therefore a person need only develop one swing throughout the set of irons. The beauty of these irons is that you can try them out for 30 days, and if you are not satisfied, return them for a full refund.

Note: This thread is 6793 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 22 - 2026-01-11 More mirror work. Back outdoors tomorrow.
    • Day 11, 1/11/26.  Today was putting, along about 6' of carpet, with coins on the ground to keep me cognizant of what I'm doing.  I think this is the at-home drill from LSW. (Ugh, missed two of the last four days -- 1/10 and 1/8)
    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.