Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4918 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am hosting a four man scramble, with around 25 teams. I am doing 3 flights, however I am unsure how to flight them. I have seen it done but It was a long time ago. CAN ANYONE HELP ME?


Posted

I don't have advice for flighting (I think you average the handicaps of the foursome and take some percentage of that to get the team handicap), but wanted to caution you against using too many rules if you are already flighting. Some examples:

"At least 3 drives from every person must be used". This is to prevent the long hitters from being the only ones whose drive is being used.

"Can't follow your own shot" - i.e., whoever's ball was chosen as the best shot, that person could not hit the following shot.

"Can't follow your drive" - i.e., if your ball was used for the drive, you can't hit the second shot (but can hit any of the other shots for the hole).  A variation of the above, just not quite so penalizing.

I guess the rationale behind any of these rules is that you want to engage the whole team, and you don't want anyone to bring in ringers whose ball would always be the one used.  But the thing is, if you're using handicaps and flighting the teams, it doesn't matter if someone wants to load up their team with ringers because the handicaps/flighting will take care of that. So if you then put too many restrictions on the scramble, you are unfairly penalizing the teams who don't have as many good players.

Basically what I'm saying is I believe scrambles should apply a judicious set of rules, and if you're using handicaps then fewer rules are necessary to make it fair.

See this thread for more discussion on this issue: http://thesandtrap.com/t/34467/scrambling-liars

Bill


Posted

Thank you for input. I would not be able to figure out everyones handicap. I know there is way to do it. I know you take the top 3 scores, but I am not sure how to decide the 2nd and 3rd flights.


Posted

Not sure what you mean about taking the top 3 scores, but I found this scramble handicap calculator which looks like exactly what you need to figure team handicaps:

http://www.leaderboard.com/SCRAMCAP.HTM

It even adjusts based on the rules you decide to implement - the "can't follow your own shot" rule for example is called a "Florida scramble", and requiring each person's drive to be used a minimum of four times is called a "Texas scramble".

Regarding flights, I'd suggest just pick something reasonable based on the distribution of team handicaps - put 1/3 of the teams in the first flight, next 1/3 in the second, last 1/3 in the third flight. There's lots of suggestions if you google "golf tournament flights" - one example:

http://www.ehow.com/how_6382793_set-up-golf-tournament-handicaps.html

If your players don't have established handicaps, you can use the scores from the scramble itself to determine their handicaps - the Scheid System is a popular way of doing that - google for more info if you're interested.

Bill


Posted

A two-county pro-am in central Missouri had an interesting scramble format:

Fivesomes, anchored by a PGA pro and a scratch amateur. The other three players were randomly assigned from the pool of available non-scratch amateurs.

In my most recent scramble, I played on a whoever team of a married couple, and two solo golfers (including me). We shot 1 under (three bogies and four birdies) out of 32 teams and ended up scoring in middle of fourth flight.

The winning team in Championship flight shot 18 under. The benefit scramble had been going on several years, and Championship flight was dominated by some of the semi-pro corporate scramble teams from the area.

A June scramble I played in had 24 teams, and split the field into two flights according to what scores your team shot. My team ended up 4 under, which put us in last place in the first flight. If we had missed one more short putt, we would have tied for lead in second flight.

A country club member-guest scramble is more likely than a benefit tournament to have team adjustments based on standard individual player handicaps.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4918 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.