Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

PGA Tour criteria for bad times


Note: This thread is 4868 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know that you have 45 seconds to hit shot from fairway.  Is if different for chipping and putting?  I watched Ben Crane take 2 min 15 seconds on the 18th Hole at Bridgestone onThursday to hit a chip shot. BTW they were a good hole behind the group in front of them!


Posted
Ben Crane needs to be penalized strokes every single week he plays. That's the only thing that'll work at this point...
  • Upvote 1

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by colin007

Ben Crane needs to be penalized strokes every single week he plays. That's the only thing that'll work at this point...


Posted
I know that you have 45 seconds to hit shot from fairway.  Is if different for chipping and putting?  I watched Ben Crane take 2 min 15 seconds on the 18th Hole at Bridgestone onThursday to hit a chip shot. BTW they were a good hole behind the group in front of them!

The allowed times are the same for all shots (60 seconds for the first to play each stage of the hole, 40 seconds for the rest of the players in the group), but the limits only apply when the group has been put on the clock. If the group ahead of you is playing faster than normal, it's possible to get a hole behind and still not get put on the clock.


Posted

How hard would it be to put a shot clock up near the green?  It seems like once these guys get near the green, everything comes to a screeching halt!  Mark the ball, check the line, practice strokes, step up to the ball, stand over it for 30 seconds, make the stroke, mark the ball, playing partner begins his routine, repeat.

Just put a big shot clock on a stand.  Start it after the playing partner makes contact - either putting or chipping.  You'd only need 18 shot clocks to cover the whole course.

  • Upvote 1

Occam's razor


Posted

Yeah, it is pretty nuts.  I watched Kevin Na and Ben Crane (same group) on Friday (i think) at The Masters play a hole.  Kevin was short of a greenside bunker and short sided himself so he had to hit a almost perfect shot to stop it close to the hole.  It felt like 5 minutes (i am sure it was not but it seemed like it).  And to follow that, Ben was in the greenside bunker and took forever to hit as well.

It was painful to watch


Posted

Although I understand the argument that these guys are playing for a living, this is not some piss about game for fun, there's absolutely no need to take 2 minutes to hit a golf shot.


Note: This thread is 4868 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.