Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4887 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've been Playing Golf for: 5 years

My current handicap index or average score is: 18

My typical ball flight is: Slight right to left.

The shot I hate or the "miss" I'm trying to reduce/eliminate is: H ook left or slight slice right (Starts right and slices away)

I have been trying to get my hips to start my downswing, but it seems to make me hit a hook or a big slice. Any tips on how I can get used to my hips starting my down swing? Thanks. Alex (16)

Any other observations of my swing will be greatly appreciated!


Posted

A frontview would be nice, I only see obvious flaws but can't see any in your swing .


Posted

I got a front view one, but it's 480FPS instead of 240. And it is a few days older than the one above. I'll upload it now :)


Posted

This is an updated video of my swing, this was taken today and I seem to have a nice high draw ball-flight. The only bad shot is where i catch the ball Fat or Thin. SO really the problem is being consistent on striking the ball. Also a very rare low hook occurs...


Posted

You are making the same disasterous takeaway that 9 out of 10 amateur golfers make (empirical evidence from tens of thousands of lessons given at Knightsbridge Golf School in London).  I was doing the same myself and am fixing it.  You roll/twist the wrists / rotate the left forearm which drastically flattens the shaft plane.

Compare your flat shaft at 10.5 to 11 secs on your first video with the position Luke Donald has his shaft in at the same stage in his takeaway / backswing.  Drastic difference!  Find a pro who won't do anything else with you until you've mastered this takeaway, which is typical of most tour pros:


Posted

Looks to me like you have too much weight on your right side at impact.  And thus - flipping at the golf ball.  Throwing away a lot of power.

Get more secondary axis tilt (head behind the ball) - and slide the hips toward the target as shown in the Hogan model mock-up by world renowned instructor Lynn Blake.

Also, your left wrist condition at impact should be straight.  And your right wrist and forearm should still have flex in it.  You need to maintain the flying wedge - through impact.  In a condition where both forearms are straight.

Watch this video which talks about maintaining the wedge through impact - which should help with the left and right arms - and wrist through impact.

.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Thanks Beachcomber, what you have said makes sense to me and I feel i can work on this when i go to the driving range. I will give this a go and i will upload a video of the new swing in a few days!

Thanks, Alex


Posted
Originally Posted by ayouden

Thanks Beachcomber, what you have said makes sense to me and I feel i can work on this when i go to the driving range. I will give this a go and i will upload a video of the new swing in a few days!

Thanks, Alex

Just remember... Keep your head still as you work on those items.

.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Would you start with working on the flying wedges first? because I think altering 2 things at once may make it worse? Or should I start with the increase of secondary tilt?

Thanks, Alex


Posted

I worked on arms first - getting the shaft on plane.  Then moved to body/pivot - as that will add power once the club is on plane.  So start with the flying wedges first IMO.  Which will ensure you have a flat left wrist condition at impact.  That is the #1 imperative of the swing... A flat left wrist condition.

.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I went into the Garden this morning and did a few swings, There is more space there than the driving range so i managed to get some front on videos so you can see my wrists.

Here is the video and from what I can see it looks better and it felt much more powerful!!!

ALL THESE SWINGS ARE DIFFERENT AND NOT THE SAME ONE REPEATED!


Posted
Originally Posted by ayouden

I went into the Garden this morning and did a few swings, There is more space there than the driving range so i managed to get some front on videos so you can see my wrists.

Here is the video and from what I can see it looks better and it felt much more powerful!!!

ALL THESE SWINGS ARE DIFFERENT AND NOT THE SAME ONE REPEATED!

I'd keep just making swings in the garden - until you start nailing some of this.  The flying wedge looks better into 'impact' or A7, but here is what I saw after which needs to be cleaned up...

You are doing a better job of maintaining the wedge - but you look like you're 'quitting' after impact.

(1.) You do pretty solid job of getting your left arm in a position such that it returns your hands on your right thigh - while maintaining lag (nice job in frame 1).

2.) I think you could have a little more secondary axis tilt - meaning your head should be slightly behind the ball - reference the models head position versus yours (fix this at address).

- I know you are making swings in the grass - but you can see in the model swing - his head is behind the ball by several inches.

(3.) You can see in frame 3 and 4 - the model has straight arms - your right arm starts bending at the elbow in frame 3 and 4 - which causes the left wrist to break.  This is referred to as 'quitting' or not finishing the golf swing. Try and keep those arms straight through post impact - all the way to frame 4.

- You can practice this by simply making swings from 9'oclock to 3'oclock with your driver in the garden. Just get your body/hands into position like in your frame 1.  Then swing and try and replicate frames 2 to 4 in the model.  The model maintains the flying wedge very well.  You can do these practice swings in your garden which will save you from having to go to the range.

(4.) I highlight this in red because this is very important... Do not let your eyes and head follow the clubhead - and ball through impact.  You can see your head is rotating - and looking down range at your target in frame 2, 3 and 4.  By comparison, the models head is steady - behind the initial ball location - and he is not looking down range at all.  His head and eyes are directed at the initial ball location even post impact.  The model doesn't look up until well after the ball is gone - and his club and hands are beyond parallel to the ground in the follow through.

Keeping your head from looking up should be very easy to fix.  So fix this first.  But keep working on the flying wedge piece (both arms straight as in frame 4 of the model).

Side note, I see some 'humping the goat' in the down the line video.... But clean up some of the items above, and then repost a video and I'll come back to the other pieces.

.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

ayouden, here is a video on a drill you could try in your back yard.  It will eliminate the breakdown or quitting issue that I'm describing.

.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Here is my attempt at a fix for the breakdown, sadly I couldn't find a rock to hand so I combined to irons together for the practise. This is the result...


Note: This thread is 4887 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.