Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4835 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi Fellow golfers,

I have recently seen a demo of a device through an investment opportunity. The device can measure speed, launch angle, horizontal angle, spin and spin axis. I hit balls myself and I observed the results are close to Trackman. I promised to keep the info confidential but the demo was impressive.

The founder of the company thinks, they can market this for 399$. I like to ask to the guys on board:


- Low cost device such as that, who will buy such a device? How big is the market? What would you do with such data? (Distance, launch angle etc). Would the average golfer buy it? If so why?

I get why the teaching pros would buy it but that is a very small market. Would you guys buy it? If so why?


Posted

If it is portable enough to be taken to the driving range, I would buy one. Especially considering Trackman devices range from 17-24 grand, haha.

2013 Nike VR_S Covert Performance Driver

2013 Nike VR_S Covert Perfomance 15° 3W

18° Burner 1.0 Superlaunch Rescue Hybrid

:mizuno: 4-PW MP-69 Irons

50°, 54° & 58° ATV wedges

Classic Collection #1 Black Putter

:bridgestone: Tour B330 Balls

2013 Tour v3 Laser Rangefinder w/ Jolt Technology

You don't know what pressure is until you play for five bucks with only two bucks in your pocket. -Lee Trevino


Posted

If it could be hooked up to a simulator, it would be a nice addition to the garage hitting net. I am assuming that this is camera based not radar (those tend to need a lot of space) Ideally you would want some software that runs on an iPad (i.e. most of us don't have room for a projector and full laptop system).

Will the average golfer buy it? Nope. But I think between teachers, schools, and dedicated golfers you could sell a couple thousand a year. Who knows if that would be enough to sustain a business or not.

Originally Posted by frankqt

Hi Fellow golfers,

I have recently seen a demo of a device through an investment opportunity. The device can measure speed, launch angle, horizontal angle, spin and spin axis. I hit balls myself and I observed the results are close to Trackman. I promised to keep the info confidential but the demo was impressive.

The founder of the company thinks, they can market this for 399$. I like to ask to the guys on board:

- Low cost device such as that, who will buy such a device? How big is the market? What would you do with such data? (Distance, launch angle etc). Would the average golfer buy it? If so why?

I get why the teaching pros would buy it but that is a very small market. Would you guys buy it? If so why?


Posted
If its anything like the optishot, which it sounds like it does, it only measures from the ground up....not to mention the huge gap (bank of infrared sensors and recievers) it has before the tee, so if u hit a fat shot u could destroy the whole unit...beware...I returned mine.

Posted
You can MAKE a launch angle device with a piece of newspaper, 2 sticks and a protractor. And if you looked around, you could probably find a used simulator system for around that price. Would I buy one? No... but Barnum had the right idea and SOMEONE would buy it because it's available.

Posted

I would assume it is more like the foresight or any of the other launch monitors that use cameras to measure ball speed. Optishot does not measure the ball at all. It measures the clubhead. I am unaware of any ball measuring monitors  less than about 700 bucks.

And yeah I am sure you could make some contrataception to measure launch angle. Let us know if it is accurate to with in .5 degrees and can do the measurement in less than 10s. 400 bucks is a bunch of money but it isn't out of the realm for any hard core golfer (i.e. the ones buying 400 dollar clubs).

Originally Posted by hanalei

If its anything like the optishot, which it sounds like it does, it only measures from the ground up....not to mention the huge gap (bank of infrared sensors and recievers) it has before the tee, so if u hit a fat shot u could destroy the whole unit...beware...I returned mine.

Sent from my Holographic Touch Android.


Posted
I'd say definitely there is a market for such a device, me for a start. The obvious points would be verification of the accuracy, does the golf ball need to be marked, does it work off grass, how can you use the data (iPad, pc etc.) If there are good answers to these questions then it would be way cheaper than something like the GC2 (probably cheaper than it needs to be in fact) and yes two thousand units is achievable BUT like most moderate or high volume products, a good investment in marketing is required to get the message out.

Note: This thread is 4835 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.