Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4784 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Originally Posted by woltaire

I have three cleveland wedges.

The rest is Callaway X-Forged 2007 model all with 6.0 Project X shafts.

I even have a 2 iron of the Callaway Tour Forged model with a 6.5 Project X shaft. (got it for 20 bucks and thought it would be fun...)

This one goes about 200 meters (40 m roll included)...

I swing pretty fast and can generate some power...

Looking at me while I swing usually results in people saying that I swing fast...

Have a look at my usual swing rhythm:

I have the feeling that I could swing anything and it wouldn't change much...

You've got the ball back in your stance. Is that your typical ball position for hitting irons? If it is then you're going to struggle to hit the ball high with the lower lofted irons which will compress the gaps between the clubs.

You've got a nice swing but the numbers you posted at the beginning indicate to me that you're not getting everything out of it that you could.


Posted
From looking at your swing it looks like you release "the lag" early. In other words the fastest part of your swing is behind the ball. When you swing your club does the whoosh sound happen before or after you hit the club. If it happens before your not putting all your speed into impact. I'm a strong person and always had a fast swing. I could hit a 5 about 175-180 yards roughly. It was an athlete's swing. I took a lesson a month ago and if feels like I'm playing a different game since. I learned to hold my "lag" until impact. At impact it's like the club takes over rocketing my ball out towards my target. I now carry 190yards with 5 iron. My whoosh used to happen before before the ball but it was o loud I thought I was swing so fast, now the club just drops silently towards the ball and whips through the impact zone. That's just my experience with a fast swing vs an effective swing. I hope you don't take this negatively just my observation that could help you load those project X's

Posted
If you look at -0.01 on the video you will notice your completely unhinged already almost a foot before the ball, that loses so much power on your swing.

Posted

On the video it's an 8 iron. I keep the shorter irons a bit back on my stance. The reason is that I noticed that I am falling behind the ball with my head. It was a simple way to keep away from hooking. With longer irons I go more forward. But hooking is a general problem for me...

By the way my 4 iron really flies high and still creates a draw shape. It's just that it is not as long as it should be...

What makes me think about the Project X 6.0 and if they are really wrong is, that on the video during impact the shaft is bent towards the target...

The swing was taken last season. I was able to reduce my overswinging this season. The idea of this is indead to create lag just in the latest moment of the impact. Maybe I take a new video tomorrow...


Posted
Originally Posted by woltaire

On the video it's an 8 iron. I keep the shorter irons a bit back on my stance. The reason is that I noticed that I am falling behind the ball with my head. It was a simple way to keep away from hooking. With longer irons I go more forward. But hooking is a general problem for me...

By the way my 4 iron really flies high and still creates a draw shape. It's just that it is not as long as it should be...

What makes me think about the Project X 6.0 and if they are really wrong is, that on the video during impact the shaft is bent towards the target...

The swing was taken last season. I was able to reduce my overswinging this season. The idea of this is indead to create lag just in the latest moment of the impact. Maybe I take a new video tomorrow...

http://thesandtrap.com/t/34727/shaft-flex-as-seen-on-camera-photos-or-video-rolling-shutter-illusion

You can't go by a picture to tell you about shaft flex. It's an illusion caused by the camera.


Posted
Its not where the ball is positioned that I'm talking about its where your wrists are unhinged. The fasted past of your swing looks a foot before the ball. Your hitting the ball almost with follow through (hence the forward shaft bend) That is probably why you hook. Your early release starts your ball flight either down the line with a hard spin or to the left of target all togther. If you hold that hinge until impact your flight will start a little right and draw back on target. Try keeping those wrist hinged till point of impact while pointing the heel of your left hand right of the target line. That's the bet way I can describe my feeling of holding lag unil impact.
  • Upvote 1

Posted

There was a guy with AP2 irons and projectX 5.5 shafts on the range today.

I was about 10 meters longer with his 5 iron...


Posted

I am going to make a complete fitting tomorrow afternoon.

Will post the results here.

Is there something that I have to know before they are going to fit me?


Posted
Originally Posted by iHack

Its not where the ball is positioned that I'm talking about its where your wrists are unhinged. The fasted past of your swing looks a foot before the ball. Your hitting the ball almost with follow through (hence the forward shaft bend) That is probably why you hook. Your early release starts your ball flight either down the line with a hard spin or to the left of target all togther. If you hold that hinge until impact your flight will start a little right and draw back on target.

Try keeping those wrist hinged till point of impact while pointing the heel of your left hand right of the target line. That's the bet way I can describe my feeling of holding lag unil impact.

iHack has your fault nailed OP.

You're releasing early and loosing power. I have exactly the same problem and my distances with the longer irons is about the same. Do like he's telling you and try to increase your lag.

Good luck. Great posts iHack. Props given.


Posted

Hey, thank you for all advice.

I went to a fitting yesterday and it took about 80 minutes.

Clubs tested were from Titleist, Mizuno, Ping etc.

Shafts tested were from ProjectX, KBS, Nippon...

Average clubheadspeed with an Iron 6 was 80 mph.

Mizuno dna resulted in shaftspecs of 3 5 4 9

The project x shafts 6.0 that I use make all kind of movement during the shot.

I have to work a lot in order to get them where I want...

We tried them on different heads and in best case they generated a linear line and simply didn't move at all...

Most harmonic and steady curve was with the Nippon 1150 stiff shaft + 0,5 inches.

Mizuno shaft optimizer recommended a Nippon 950 stiff shaft.

Best clubhead was a Mizuno JPX 825 pro.

I carried some six irons 160 meters with the JPX pro and the nippon shaft combination and had much higher spinrates.

Longest shot with that six iron was 172 meters...


Posted
I have 1st generation Jpx pro. Love them. Mizuno is such a nice iron. I'm a tech dork and love getting new clubs but I think I'll keep these Mizuno for years to come.

Posted

Thank you.

It is said that the 825 pro are a huge step forward from the 800 pro.

Maybe you can give them a try.

I especially liked the light weight with the nippon shaft.

What I don't like is that they again make the lofts stronger.

The 7 iron of the 825 has 33°.

In my opinion that's a step into the wrong side.

They should make clubsets with a PW starting from 52° again and reintroduce the 1 iron on the other far end.


Posted

For our information: Ben Hogan in his book, Power Golf, gives a range of distances of his clubs. Eg. 4i regular 165, max 190, and min 155yrds.  7i, 135, 160, 125 and 9i, 115, 140 and 105.  So if you are getting 140 out of your 7i, you hit the ball as far as Hogan did 65 yrs ago.  What he might be doing today is anyone's guess.  But you can see that more distance alone may not be the answer to low scores.


Posted
Originally Posted by joekelly

For our information: Ben Hogan in his book, Power Golf, gives a range of distances of his clubs. Eg. 4i regular 165, max 190, and min 155yrds.  7i, 135, 160, 125 and 9i, 115, 140 and 105.  So if you are getting 140 out of your 7i, you hit the ball as far as Hogan did 65 yrs ago.  What he might be doing today is anyone's guess.  But you can see that more distance alone may not be the answer to low scores.

I agree with you that distance (expecially with irons) doesn't make a world of difference, although hitting higher shots from further away that land softer on firm greens does make a difference.

As far as Hogan's distances: Keep in mind that a 9 iron today has the same loft as a 7 iron even 30 years ago, so to compare Hogan's distances with modern clubs we would have to compare his 7 iron with our 9 iron.

Sells a lot of clubs when they can show us on a launch monitor that the new club they want to sell is longer than the one we have now. They usually forget to mention that the 6 iron on the new set has the same loft as the 5 iron on our old set. Any of us that are carrying a 3 iron are already carrying the same loft club as that 1 iron that Travino joked even God couldn't hit.


Posted

Yes, that's exactly what I experienced on the flightscope.

I got the mizuno 825 pro clubhead in my hands and it was a wonderful feeling during impact and so on...

I instantly had about 10 meters more than before.

But the first thing that I wanted to know then was how much loft that six iron has.

And it came up that mizuno altered their lofts this year from 31° to 29° for the six iron...

The same for many other companies...

The result of this developement is that all the long irons will fall away in future...

No wonder that the hybrid market is continously growing...

And there will be need for a second gap wedge with 48°...

That's silly...

Instead of this a club making company should have the courage to reintroduce the old Ben Hogan club lofts and add some longer irons to their set.

Their fear is that nobody would buy those clubs, but I think that people are not stupid and will get more and more informed in future...

  • Upvote 1

Note: This thread is 4784 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • No one should measure a joint mobility away from that joint. If you go to physical therapy, they are not measuring your knee mobility based on your midline. It is based at the joint. Shoulder mobility should be measured in reference to the shoulder joint. 
    • He's using a driver swing, while I used the iron swing. Bryson goes from about 65° B to 15° B, hence the 50°. If you bend your right elbow, you're going to pull your hands across your chest some. Conversely, if you abduct your right arm and hold onto a grip with your left arm, you can see how extending the right elbow as we do in the golf swing during the downswing will "pull" the right shoulder/humerus forward (adducting it, as going from 65° to 15° of abduction is). Even people who pull their right shoulder WAY too far around them eventually get it "back in front" when their right arm/elbow extends. So, such a motion shows up as shoulder adduction even though the movement that causes it is just widening the trail elbow. The left hand on the grip almost "pulls" the hands forward as the left arm can't stretch much (there's some shoulder protraction, but that's almost maxed out at P4). Oh, I downloaded it and watched it (and commented there) before he blocked me. It's what led to him posting the comment in the "update" above. 😄  Single shoulder range of 75°, and that's going out well into the follow-through. 50° Max range up to impact. Manavian's video is bad. He keeps saying "midline" which is just a horrible way to look at it. He also kept saying that the club was moving that amount — also wrong. Adding left and right together is really freaking dumb. Another golf instructor said "That's like saying the player has 100 degrees of knee bend (adding left knee bend to right knee bend) 🤦‍♂️" (similar to what the biomechanist said about squatting). Also, see my post above about elbow bend. That's why Plummer’s alignment stick demo is so intellectually dishonest. A golfer can't get anywhere near that position on the left with his left hand on the alignment stick (quoted below).  
    • That makes no sense at all.  so, I watched that Instagram. Here is a summary...  Bryson.... Address: Trail Shoulder 0 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 65-deg abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 15-deg abduction. P9: 10 degrees adduction. Rory... Address: Trail Shoulder 16 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 26 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 0 degrees abduction.  P9: 18 degrees of adduction.  DJ... Address: Trail Shoulder 4 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 42 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 2 degrees abduction.  P9: 15 degrees of adduction.  Their point is that arm doesn't stay on the trail side. That the arms have to get across the chest from P4 to P9. I mean they do. What matters is the rate of which it happens relative to the position of the swing. The trail shoulder at P9 is not abducted a lot. The range of that total abduction movement is like 40 to 70 degrees. Bryson might be an outlier. Rory might be an outlier as well.  A couple of points.  1. None of them had any adduction at impact. So, this tells me the trail arms stays on the trail side of the body at impact. Is it moving towards lead shoulder, yes. It doesn't happen till post impact. The right side of the body is moving towards the target, so the arms don't have to as much as people think.  2. Trail shoulder adduction from Impact to P9 is 18 to 25 degrees.  3. P9 adduction of the trail shoulder is only about 2 to 12 degrees more adducted than at address. The arms/hands stay in front of the chest a long-time post impact. If Rory, from his address position just rotated his body towards the target and raised up his arms so he is at P9. He basically didn't have to move his trail arm further across his chest than where he started at address. Visualize that for a bit. I bet for people who tend to stall and drag their arms across their body to hit the ball, that would emphasize how much the arms stay in front of the body and how much you have to turn.             
    • Do you know how Manavian is measuring his shoulder adduction-abduction that purports to demonstrate 50 degrees or motion in Bryson's downswing? I know the broader biomechanics research/scientific literature on this suggests shoulder adduction-abduction is only a modest contributor of force generation in the downswing, so I'm definitely not convinced by anything he's arguing, I'm just curious how different people can be claiming to use ostensibly the same "data" to tell a much different story.
    • I have an update… I don't have much of a response, because the fact that they would ADD the numbers for the lead and trail shoulder together… I mean, wow. I was giving them too much credit. Nobody would think to assume they were doing THAT. That's beyond comical. One of the biomechanists I talked to put it this way: "So if I squatted down and went from 180 to 90 deg knee angle, then I would say 180 deg range of motion because I have two knees?" I'd type more (maybe), but honestly, I'm laughing a bit too hard. 🤣 Update: Mini Manavian blocked me on Instagram, so I cannot see his post showing Bryson with about 50° of range of motion (with a driver) from P4 to P7, and 75° only if you go out to the mid-follow-through. What a terrible loss for me. 😉 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.