Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4490 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I must be a freak.  I can not hit a hybrid well.  I tend to get the hooks going.  My clubs are 4 up maybe that has something to do with it.  I recently got a 2 iron made to my specs.  I love this club.  It is my "has to be in the fairway club".  It is my long approach club.  It can be my layup on a par 5 club if the drive did not go so well.  In general I like my irons and my driver and I have a love hate thing going.

Any other long iron lovers out there?  Any one iron lovers?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I was with you up until about 2 years ago.  I tried a variety of the hybrids and just didn't like them, I didn't hit them as well as I did my long irons.  I tried hybrids from all of the OEM's, Callaway, Taylormade, Cobra, Adams, Mizuno, but none of them worked for me.  I'm a good ball striker and never had problems hitting long irons, but the older I got the slower my swing speed got and I just can't hit long irons like I once did, so I started another trek thru the hybrids.  I finally found the TaylorMade Rescue club and was able to make it work for me.

Stick with what works for you!

Craig 

Yeah, wanna make 14 dollars the hard way?


Posted
I'm with you on the hybrids. I had one and either hit a huge push fade or a hook. I ended up giving it to my buddy and picked up a 18º Callaway prototype iron and I love it. I hit it almost as far as my 3 wood and much straighter. I've hit a bunch of hybrids and haven't really been impressed with any of them. It must be a mental thing because my buddy loves the one I gave him and he hits the shit out of it.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

My brother is about a 25 HDCP, but he has been able to smoke a 2i since he was about 14 years old. He carries an old 2i along with his newer cavity-back irons.

On long approaches in scrambles, he takes out the 2i and hits a low, solid shot that ends up on the green or front fringe. He usually delivers a couple of times a round.

He sometimes jerks his PW shots to the left, but somehow always nails that 2i.

So, enjoy your 2i.

As for hybrids , you will find a lot of variety. Players with good clubhead speed should try hybrids with a pro or tour head (most standard hybrids have a draw face). Also, make sure your hybrid shaft is heavy enough (weight) so that you don't overpower it.

If you can hit the 2i, you might be better with a 3W plus a 5W or 7W as your longer clubs, and just skip the hybrid.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

This is my first tee post, no jitters. :)

I have a Nike hybrid that never found the course with me.  I should never have bought it in the first place but a sale at GolfTown got the better of me and I just bought it off the rack without regard to the loft or fit.  I hit this thing way too high and I hit my 4 iron just as well.

I used to hit a 1 iron at my old home course, same thing, it was my go to club to hit the fairway on tight 4's and some 5's.

My home 10th was the primary reason, 260 yards to a hill.  3 wood flies the hill (the hole is downhill) and the bottom was always wet, always. You could get caught on the down slope also.

The whole course was full of mid length par 4s where even a 3 wood could have been too much on some of the holes and a 3 iron leaves too long an approach.

I tried a 2 iron that matched my set but never got the feel for it. A new one may find its way in my bag sooner rather than later.

The only problem I had with the 1 iron was putting that extra bit of oomph into the shot.  It really needed a nice, easy swing.  That little bit extra had me push it or fade it, or both on a bad day.

Paul


Posted

I like my long irons, I can even hit a 1 okay. But the trouble is that the height and the carry yardage just don't match what I like to do in that part of my set. Plus my adams hybrid is a great club for versatility; I may get a driving iron at 17 degrees with a matching shaft from my irons as I love my setup there, but I don't think it would do any better and it would be hard to stop the shot. I don't really care for the ultra low trajectory shot anymore, as it tends to wreck the best parts of my iron game. My well struck shots are fairly straight and towering with any club, and the spin is relatively under control so I know anything low is a mistake even if it goes the same distance.

Not much a 2 iron can do that a 3 or 2h can't do, and there's a couple of things it can't do that the hybrid can. If I were to carry a 2 iron I'd probably ditch my 3 wood that I really like and get a 15 degree hybrid, but that would just bump my gaps down a bit and remove my longest possible shot off the ground that I like having in the bag.

Of course, it goes without saying that I prefer cavity backs. Blades below about 25˚ of loft are pretty useless for me. Everything up to and including my 48˚ PW are CBs. Anyone playing a blade 2 or 1 iron these days is either delusional or doing it for the novelty.

In My Bag:

Adams Super LS 9.5˚ driver, Aldila Phenom NL 65TX
Adams Super LS 15˚ fairway, Kusala black 72x
Adams Super LS 18˚ fairway, Aldila Rip'd NV 75TX
Adams Idea pro VST hybrid, 21˚, RIP Alpha 105x
Adams DHY 24˚, RIP Alpha 89x
5-PW Maltby TE irons, KBS C taper X, soft stepped once 130g
Mizuno T4, 54.9 KBS Wedge X
Mizuno R12 60.5, black nickel, KBS Wedge X
Odyssey Metal X #1 putter 
Bridgestone E5, Adidas samba bag, True Linkswear Stealth
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Its the offset, though hybrids are getting better these days. Hybrids use to have a huge offset, they still have a good amount. For a longer iron this tends to really cause a person to aim their club left. Offset wont mess with the rate of closure on the clubface, its like less than a tenth of a degree, nothing you'll ever notice.

If your going with a Hybrid, I would find one with as least offset as possible.

I am currently going to be looking into the Mizuno MP H4 long irons. I just got the MP-59, and I am still in the camp that longer irons need a bit more help. The MP H4 cost in the low range for hybrids, and they have a shorter shaft, steel shaft, so they will be more accurate. They will fly a bit lower than a Hybrid, so not recommended for a person with a slow swing speed. Hybrids really shine for those who need the extra height to gain that carry.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4490 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.