• Announcements

    • iacas

      Visit FlagstickRule.com   03/13/2017

      Visit the site flagstickrule.com to read about and sign a petition for the USGA/R&A regarding the one terrible rule in the proposed "modernized" rules for 2019.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
pabird

American x European courses

8 posts in this topic

Lots of chat on the American and European golfers but possibly in ignorance I wondered if the difference is down to the nature of home courses individuals are reared on In Britain for instance all coastal courses demand shot making of a most variable skills whilst from viewing American courses (on TV) it is far more similar to long rang pitch and putt with greens hugely more receptive It is also apparent that when Americans spend time touring Europe they tend to end up being more successful Some obvious supposition in my thoughts having never played a selection of American courses but feelings gain.ed from TV viewing
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Lots of chat on the American and European golfers but possibly in ignorance I wondered if the difference is down to the nature of home courses individuals are reared on

In Britain for instance all coastal courses demand shot making of a most variable skills whilst from viewing American courses (on TV) it is far more similar to long rang pitch and putt with greens hugely more receptive

It is also apparent that when Americans spend time touring Europe they tend to end up being more successful

Some obvious supposition in my thoughts having never played a selection of American courses but feelings gain.ed from TV viewing

I have never played European courses but I would like to.  I think the courses are just different. They both require shot making, but of a different kind.  The links courses you reference tend to have wind but also allow lots of roll out.  The parkland type courses in the US present different challenges that sometime require high shots that need all carry.  Examples are the 18th at St. Andrews vs. the 18th at Oak Hill last year.

I am glad they are different because variety really makes it more fun.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The most successful American on the European Tour has been Peter Uihlein who was great in 2013 but is playing like a dog now. Brooks Koepka has been playing in Europe a lot and developed. With the web.com tour, many players hang out there now hoping to gain auto admission to the Big Show.

Shame, because the European Tour definitely grows a player - you have so much more to deal with.

As for courses, depends on where you go, as ever. There are an equal number of crap courses in Europe than there are good and it's the same in the US.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I always have the feeling that when the weather gets bad, European players will play better then the American players on average. Don't know if there are actual statistics about that, but it seems Europeans are much more used to play in bad weather circumstances. Is that true?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I always have the feeling that when the weather gets bad, European players will play better then the American players on average. Don't know if there are actual statistics about that, but it seems Europeans are much more used to play in bad weather circumstances. Is that true?

I think it is more like, "When the weather gets bad, great players play better."  We have bad weather in the US too.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think it is more like, "When the weather gets bad, great players play better."  We have bad weather in the US too.

Ofcourse, USA is quite big so am sure there's a lot of bad weather ;-) But if I look at the perfect courses where a lot of the tournaments are played, and I look at the European Tour it seems to me I defenitely see a difference. On average that is. But maybe it's just in my head.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:

Originally Posted by boogielicious

I think it is more like, "When the weather gets bad, great players play better."  We have bad weather in the US too.

Ofcourse, USA is quite big so am sure there's a lot of bad weather ;-) But if I look at the perfect courses where a lot of the tournaments are played, and I look at the European Tour it seems to me I defenitely see a difference. On average that is. But maybe it's just in my head.

If you are talking about wind as "bad weather", certainly the links course have that in the UK.  But there are other types of bad weather.  A recent Champions Tour major was played in 40C temperatures with high humidity.  Players were passing out.  East and West coast US courses certainly have wind and rain.  How about mosquitoes?  Not all US courses are perfect parkland either.  US Open this year is a good example.

The fact that many Open Championships and European Tour events have been won by US players from mild climates indicates that it is not an overwhelming challenge.  I still say that great players play great in any weather.  I think you are perceiving a difference that in not there.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

If you are talking about wind as "bad weather", certainly the links course have that in the UK.  But there are other types of bad weather.  A recent Champions Tour major was played in 40C temperatures with high humidity.  Players were passing out.  East and West coast US courses certainly have wind and rain.  How about mosquitoes?  Not all US courses are perfect parkland either.  US Open this year is a good example.

The fact that many Open Championships and European Tour events have been won by US players from mild climates indicates that it is not an overwhelming challenge.  I still say that great players play great in any weather.  I think you are perceiving a difference that in not there.

I guess you're right. To handle certain circumstances and to adept to them, you need to have certain qualities. You forgot to mention the alligators on certain courses btw ;-)

Btw, earlier this year on the European Tour this happenend:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Played yesterday at SGCC. 36-40-76 -2 birdies and 2 doubles (ugh), one double was a 3-putt
    • I am going to try the TP version of my old club.  It has a 390CC head.  It was only 30 bucks so I figured it couldn't hurt to see if it helps a little on the forgiveness.  I guess the game is just passing me by...I can't see myself using those gigantic drivers.  The thing I noticed is that with the smaller head, that I am more focused on hitting the sweet spot.  With the giant club it just seems like you hit it anywhere on the face.  Am I correct in thinking that a "sweet spot" is not any larger on the bigger heads?  Is it just that on off center hits there is better chance of hitting it straight?  
    • I'll keep this on the short side because some random person's Member Swing thread isn't really the place for this kind of discussion… By most I'll clarify: the vast, vast majority. I'm not talking about 53% here. That doesn't mean you were doing it right or most efficiently. You may very well have been capable of making the change - and making it more quickly - with a ball if you'd done it differently. Sounds slow. Not for everyone, but for a good chunk of people. That's not what I advocate in the above linked post, either. Generally speaking, here's what I see: You tell people to fix the move without a golf ball. They work and work and film and record, and eventually, they've got a great practice swing. You say "great, now do that with a ball" and they almost immediately and completely revert to their old swing. Simply put, what I recommend to people is: A rehearsal swing or two. Often these too are shorter, slower, simpler swings. A shorter, slower, simpler swing focusing just on the "piece" while hitting a ball. As you become proficient, the swing gets less short, less slow, and closer to the full swing. Practice at the edge of your ability, but do it with a ball. The approach there blends no-ball practice (the first bullet) but immediately ties it to a motion you make with a golf ball. If you're shanking, topping, etc. the ball too much, you're not doing it slowly, "shortly," or simply enough.
    • Shot a 41 in my match play League.  Opponent was giving me 3 strokes.  I won the match 5 to 4. 5 pars 3 bogeys 1 double Good:  Drove 6/7 fairways and the only one that I missed was by about a foot.  Hit some very good approach shots.  I had 4 birdie putts ranging from 6-25 feet.  Alas, i made none. Bad: Other than duffing 2 shots on the first hole (an easy par 5) i played pretty solid.    
    • This entirely depends on where you play. I play courses that usually have three groups and a couple of singles out per side, and I would say no, but then I get to an urban course, like Long. Island, or South Florida, and it's anger management time.  I like to watch my friends's shots, and compliment their successes, I take a couple practice swings if I am in an uneven lie, or whatever, but I am not going to spend time searching for extra balls while walking between shots, or sit and BS at the tee before shooting. For some reason I am always ready to hit first, honors or no, and I just don't get why people take so long there. As long as I can do the things I enjoy, like watching my shots and my friends shots, and take due care taking my shots and putting, I don't feel rushed, but three hours for a foursome means you have four serious golfers. My golfing is more social so that is unlikely to happen. I play with one guy who takes pace seriously, and we do fine.  If we want to pick up the pace of a group, we play best ball. Maybe the conversations on the tee are because that's where everybody gathers together for the next hole and people like to talk. I like to play golf.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Golfgirl10543
      Golfgirl10543
      (43 years old)
    2. jkettman
      jkettman
      (28 years old)
    3. old man1953
      old man1953
      (64 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon