Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6658 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I have determined thru several measurements that my club length requirement is "one inch over."

Assuming the standard 5 iron is 37.5" in steel and 38" graphite, does that mean that my steel 5 iron would be 38.5" and graphite 39"?

My basic question is whether the graphite should only be "1/2 inch over" since it is already .5" longer than steel or should the full one inch increase should be applied to the graphite shafts.

Thanks

Ken B
NJ hacker

Posted
How did you determine that you were +1 on your irons? Was it through a professional fitting? If so, were you fit with steel shafted of graphite shafted irons? Going a full inch on the graphite will probably mess up the lie angle. Anyway, most clubs I have seen only have a 1/4 inch difference between the stock length of steel and graphite. Maybe you are looking somewhere different than I am, but both TM and Callaway have a .25 difference.
In My Bag
Driver: R5 TP 9.5 Diamana
3 Wood: V-Steel 15* UST V2
5 Wood: R7 Steel
Hybrids: Heavenwood 20* UST V2 Rescue Mid 22* UST V2Irons: RAC LT2 5-9 Project X FlightedWedges: RAC Black TP 47* 51* 55* 60*Putter: White Hot 2 BallBalls: One Black

Posted
I have a question.

In all manufactures irons clubs like ping, mizuno, etc, the standar spec for graphite shaft are .25 inches longer than standar spec for steel shaft?

What is in my Ping bag:
Driver: R7 425 9.5*Fujikura Vistapro 70 stff
3Wood: An old 15* Graphite Stiff.
5Wood: R7 ST 18* Mid point RE-AX 70 Stff
7Wood: Tight lies 21* Graphite StffIrons: An old set of EYE2+ 4-PW Steel StiffWedge: vokey SM 54*10 and 60*08Putter: Studio Style Newport 1.5Balls...


Posted
I have a question.

I am not sure about all manufacturers, but I know that new offerings from both TM and Callaway only have a .25 inch difference between standard length of steel and graphite.

In My Bag
Driver: R5 TP 9.5 Diamana
3 Wood: V-Steel 15* UST V2
5 Wood: R7 Steel
Hybrids: Heavenwood 20* UST V2 Rescue Mid 22* UST V2Irons: RAC LT2 5-9 Project X FlightedWedges: RAC Black TP 47* 51* 55* 60*Putter: White Hot 2 BallBalls: One Black

Posted
As a tall guy (I'm assuming you are too), my advice is play the shortest clubs you are comfortable with.

Bigger people tend to be stronger than avg. size people, and your longer arms will give you a bigger arc on your swing even with regular length clubs. Swing speed won't be a problem for you.

Control is another matter. Every extra inch between your shoulders and the clubhead reduces your control. As a tall person, you are at a disadvantage when it comes to control.

The extra length on the graphite shafts is there, because with the lighter shaft people can get more swing speed (but it comes at the sacrifice of control, even for avg. height people.)

Distance hitting has two parts: swing speed & hitting the sweet spot on the club. It doesn't matter how fast you swing the club, if you don't consistently strike the sweet spot on the club you won't drive very far. On the other hand, even with a moderate tempo swing you can have good distance if you consistently hit the sweet spot on the club.

According to some of the online charts, I should be playing a club 2 inches longer than regular. I play 3/4 inches over regular. I've found I'm comfortable with that length. If you can't get club fit, then go to someplace (like Golfsmith) where you can try out various length clubs and see what you are comfortable with. You may be surprised that longer isn't always more comfortable (even for a tall person.)

If you are looking after the longest length possible, because you think it will increase your swing speed and help your distance, don't do it. Just get ultra-light shafts, but don't make them extra long. The lighter shafts will help your speed, and keeping them shorter will help your control. That combo will give you a better chance of CONSISTENTLY hitting long drives than extra long shafts will.

Instight XTD A30S Driver 10.5° ($69 new ebay)
Instight XTD A3OS Fairway Wood 15° ($45 new ebay)
Fybrid 19.5° ($35 new ebay)
Ci7 4-GW ($175 new Rock Bottom Golf via ebay)
53° & 58° 8620 DD wedges ($75 each new PGA Superstore) C2-DF ($35 new Rock Bottom Golf) Riley TT stand bag ($7 n...


Posted
Thanks Hytrew, very informative. Actually, I was liking the longer shaft due to my back (less hunched over). Your advice to try different shaft lengths is good, I will do that.

Posted
The extra 1/2" in graphite came into play to try making the swingweight the same, however a good clubmaker can adjust this internally.

SO, if you were fitted for 1/2" over standard, then play that regardless of shaft material.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 6658 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.