Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

As Golf’s Best Player, Jordan Spieth Is Determined to Get Better [NYT]


Note: This thread is 3721 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted

I'd add take an extra long break. The guy has been going non-stop since a little before Masters up to now. Rest up.

Henrik Stenson, who was paired with Spieth for the final two rounds at East Lake, praised Spieth’s putting but also singled out his mental focus, describing both as “the best in the world.”

Mental focus is not magical thinking. In Spieth’s case, his mind is where preparation, analysis and design intersect. The mental side of the game, he said, is about “taking situations from the previous weeks, dissecting them, figuring out what went right, what went wrong; when I went on good stretches, when I didn’t bounce back from a bogey or when I made a couple birdies and then made a couple bogeys right after; trying to understand what mistakes I made in my game decision-wise.”

Asked what he could do for an encore in 2015-16, Spieth said: “Hopefully improve. Get better.”

He checked off the areas in which he could improve: “Ball-striking. I can get stronger. I can hit it farther. My short game.”

The way he ended the playoffs, it is easy to forget that he began them with his first back-to-back missed cuts of the season.

“It gives me a lot of confidence going forward for the next 20 years,” Spieth said, “to know that if I remain healthy, that even when things are poor we can get back to this level quickly.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/29/sports/golf/complacency-is-no-worry-as-jordan-spieth-charts-his-encore.html?_r=0

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3721 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.