Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast!
IGNORED

Seth Raynor

Big Lex

By Big Lex
in Golf Courses and Architecture

 Share
Note: This thread is 3720 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Big Lex Great Member

Big Lex

Posted
Posted

The owners of my home club believe it was designed by Seth Raynor. For decades, nobody knew who designed the course, because all club documents had been destroyed in a club house fire in the 1940s. People who had been around since the course opened in the 1920s never apparently recorded or had any knowledge of who the designer was.

One of the owners embarked on a research project in an attempt to identify the architect. He concluded it was Raynor. His case is not without merit, but would never meet reasonable standards of proof in a civil court case. 

Still, they have gone full steam ahead renovating the course in the style of Raynor. Some things about this I love, others I hate. Overall the course isn't really that much harder to score on, but I think most members find it less fun to play. The course looks significantly better after the renovations. Overall, I think a slight majority of members preferred the course the old way.

Curious what forum members think, those of you who belong to private clubs....would you like it more if you thought your course was a Raynor or Tillinghast or other classic architecht's course? Anyone been through a renovation?

JP Bouffard

"I cut a little driver in there." -- Jim Murray

Driver: Titleist 915 D3, ACCRA Shaft 9.5*.
3W: Callaway XR,
3,4 Hybrid: Taylor Made RBZ Rescue Tour, Oban shaft.
Irons: 5-GW: Mizuno JPX800, Aerotech Steelfiber 95 shafts, S flex.
Wedges: Titleist Vokey SM5 56 degree, M grind
Putter: Edel Custom Pixel Insert 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1
1

  • 2 weeks later...
MSchott Great Member

MSchott

Posted
Posted

How cool would it be if Raynor was the original designer! Can I ask who is doing the renovation and the name of the club? I participate in a forum that is all about this kind of question and someone there may have knowledge of your club.

If it was me, as a purist I would want the club to be as close as possible to the original design, using the classic Raynor templates.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1

Note: This thread is 3720 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up

  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).

  • Posts

    • iacas
      Mizuno Jpx One Driver & Fairway Woods

      By iacas · Posted

      I think you're saying it's preposterous to think that the areas on this club are anything like what's shown here: 30mm toward the toe or heel loses only 5% distance? Highly, highly doubtful. So a guy who hits the ball there and normally hits the ball about 250… will hit it instead about 238. By missing the sweet spot by about 1.2 inches? Highly, highly doubtful. Heck, the high heel barely gets into the red, and orange is only "up to" 10%! @M2R, I've never heard of "Ask Golf Nut" but I'm dubious of his claims in the video and really, really dubious of what's on his site: "Why AskGolfNut Is the Most Trusted Data-Driven Golf Resource". Hmmmmmm.
    • 5amZ
      "5 Minutes Daily" Practice Challenge

      By 5amZ · Posted

      Day 151 1-11 flow work today. I've been doing all pause work, so Inwanted to get some rhythm going. Recorded.
    • iacas
      PGA Tour 6 Rule Changes for 2026

      By iacas · Posted

      a) No b) This MLR says: I doubt the MLR is going to affect their weekly league games, in other words.
    • Maroon88
      PGA Tour 6 Rule Changes for 2026

      By Maroon88 · Posted

      So the question was posed today by some of my friends.  Is a pitch mark the same as a divot?  I thought NO, but they argued if your ball lands in another player's divot (made by club during a swing) this was the same as a pitch mark, i.e. the ball mark made when the ball lands  
    • saevel25
      Mizuno Jpx One Driver & Fairway Woods

      By saevel25 · Posted

      Original definition use to or still is how far offline you hit it. It might be better to think of it as consistency in retaining favorable launch conditions to optimize distance.   That heat map showed a gigantic 0-3% loss in ball speed. That is absurd. The true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. Good luck telling the difference if the sweet spot is under 3% in a sizable area. Especially considering variation in launch angle, spin, and outdoor weather.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

  I accept