Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3358 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Mostly wanting to hear from teaching pros.  I have set aside some funds to put towards golf.  I am currently playing a set of MX-23 irons (not fit for me).   I will say there is nothing really wrong with them.  But, I got them in 2004 and based on the improvements I got after getting a pro fit/new driver, I am thinking I might see some benefits from getting new clubs and more specifically getting them fit and custom made. At a minimum I am thinking I will get my current clubs retro fit.  But I am afraid by the time I get new shafts and adjustments made I might as well buy new and take advantage of new technology.  I am also thinking I will get at least a 5 pack of lessons.  I don't have an endless piggy bank to take a lesson a few times a week or the time.  But I would like to take one lesson every other week (with my schedule it is tuff to plan stuff in advance) and that would give me some time to practice what is covered.  

So here is the big question, do I take the lessons first so I can maybe fix some stuff in my swing and then get fit for clubs with my "newer" swing or get fit have perfect clubs for me to take full advantage of the lessons?  

If this helps: I played a fair amount of golf through college and shortly after.  Got down to a 15 handicap.  Got married, had kids ect, didn't swing a club for over 5 years.  Been back in the game for about 3 months or so and loving it.  Happy to be back in a place in my life were I can get out once a week or so plus a trip or two to the range.  Currently have about 15 rounds in since the break.  Tacked the last 8 rounds with an estimated 20 handicap.  Still knocking out cob webs especially in the short game.  


Posted

Appreciate I am not a pro but if you were a 15 handicap and your getting back towards that then you have a half decent swing to begin with, its not like your a complete newbie to the game shooting well over 100 where i would say custom fit clubs might not be the best first move.

In your case though I would highly recommend it, especially as your handicap was around the same level as mine is now, I found custom clubs to be of great benefit, not just to my game but to my confidence as well. I would suggest finding yourself a pro who does lessons and  club fitting and explain to him your goals, that way when he fits the clubs he will have in the back of his mind where you want to be so may fit the clubs to suit a potentially improved swing instead of fitting to the exact swing you have now if that makes sense?

 

The thing to also consider are things like driver flex, iron lies etc, if these are out, is there much point in shelling out for lessons where these may hold back your progress?

:tmade: Driver: TM Superfast 2.0 - 9.5degree - Reg flex
:mizuno: 3 Wood: JPX800 - 16* Exhsar5 Stiff
:mizuno: 3 - PW: MP-67 Cut Muscle back - S300 stiff
:slazenger: Sand Wedge: 54degree, 12degree bounce
:slazenger: Lob Wedge: 60degree 10degree bounce
:ping: Putter: Karsten 1959 Anser 2 Toe weighted
:mizuno: Bag - Cart Style


Posted (edited)

Thanks carpe4300, someone else mentioned that as well.  But I was hesitant based on not wanting someone who does club fittings as a "side job" rather then a expert at a specific club fitting location. I live on the west coast in socal, so I am fortunet to have several of the major manufactures close by plus 2 of golf digest top 100 fitters less then a hour away.  So I was planing on getting fit by one of those options.  

Is that the way to go as far as getting fit or does it not really make a difference?

Edited by Moose9018

Posted

I got fit by a local shop using a trackman and they fitted me with the right loft and right shaft etc and my shots really improved (with my driver) but it transpired to be fit for that swing, so now im swinging faster and better its not the best it could be, but its not far off

 

Thats why i mentioned choosing a pro to do lessons with that can also fit your clubs, he may look at your numbers and be like "this club you have is not right for you, but neither is this one however with lessons it will be for XYZ reason" 

:tmade: Driver: TM Superfast 2.0 - 9.5degree - Reg flex
:mizuno: 3 Wood: JPX800 - 16* Exhsar5 Stiff
:mizuno: 3 - PW: MP-67 Cut Muscle back - S300 stiff
:slazenger: Sand Wedge: 54degree, 12degree bounce
:slazenger: Lob Wedge: 60degree 10degree bounce
:ping: Putter: Karsten 1959 Anser 2 Toe weighted
:mizuno: Bag - Cart Style


Note: This thread is 3358 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.