OK, I know this has no doubt been discussed many times, but there is only so much we can talk about when it comes to golf. I live in the UK and most other golfers I have spoken to tend to agree with me. Unlike the old system we had, we now have a handicap that we should be averaging, rather than the old system when we played to it. In fact, I was once told a person should only play to their handicap a few times a year when playing off of the white tees. In my case this was very true. When the new system was introduced three years ago just about everyone's handicap went up, and from memory mine went up about two shots. I quite like the new system in the fact it is quite reactive. I put in on average three cards a week during the summer months, and my handicap goes up and down like an elevator (lift in England). What I dislike about it is the ridiculous handicaps people can now have. When I started playing golf the maximum was 28, it's now 54. Being given three shots on any hole is just crazy. I would have accepted 36 as a compromise, especially as things get harder as you get older. I know the idea is that golf should be inclusive, but I thought it had something to do with skill as well. Like I said, when I first received my handicap I was given 28. OK, I was in reality playing to about 40, but through practice I was soon playing to my handicap, and it dropped quite quickly.
Anyway, what are your thoughts?