• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
jontyrees

new irons, lies and more lies

5 posts in this topic

clubhead lie that is....

Quick background - 51 yrs old, played since I was 13, always could hit the ball pretty well, HC always within a 3-putt of 10, either side. Last few years been struggling to stay consistent, switching clubs - basically thrashing. Decided to get properly fit and advised on new irons, and I live in austin, TX, so there's a big Golfsmith nearby. Hit a bunch of irons over the last few days, on the monitor and outside, and to my suprise, most successful have been the Rocketbladez and Rocketballz - nothing between them. Today, while whacking more balls on the monitor, the assistant pulled out a lie board and had me take a few cuts. Since my misses were generally pushes about 10yd right, or draw/hooks 10-20yds left, and my good shots were draws to the line, he thought I was probably hitting heel first, and needed flatter clubs. I've always suspected that, as the toe of my club is off the ground at address. Not the case at all - I was hitting toe first consistently, with all the balls toward the toe of the club - the marks said I need 2degrees upright. He pulled a 2degree upright club, I hit on the board again, bingo - hitting the center of the clubface, sole marks right in the middle also.

Question is, what about too-flat clubs would suggest I'd have relatively frequent misses left, and a general l to r ball flight?

Now I'm also considering just having my current clubs bent rather than getting a whole new set. The Rocketballz/bladez were very impressive btw - whatever my previous thoughts were on the name or GI clubs in general. Up around 185yds+ with a 7i, great solid feel, and for me pretty accurate. This was with the stock graphite S. I also tried Amp Cell, X-Hot, JPX825, Cleveland 588TT and MT, Altitide, and some others. My days of vanity forged are most likely over!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

I'm new to golf (so take it fir what it is worth) but have read a ton on this very issue. My understanding is this. A too flat club will cause the toe to hit first, thereby slowing the toe of the blade down while the heel powers through. Hence an open face and a left to right ball flight. I do not believe the left misses have anything to do with lie, but rather are more likely the result of your swing path.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Desert

I'm new to golf (so take it fir what it is worth) but have read a ton on this very issue. My understanding is this. A too flat club will cause the toe to hit first, thereby slowing the toe of the blade down while the heel powers through. Hence an open face and a left to right ball flight. I do not believe the left misses have anything to do with lie, but rather are more likely the result of your swing path.

I'm no expert, by any means, but I think it's even simpler than that.  (Your answer may also be true, but I think the following is as well :))

If you rest a club (a right handed iron) on the ground so it sits perfectly flat and attach a pencil (or anything pointy) to the center of the clubface pointing exactly perpendicular to said club face, it will point up in the air some amount, and directly at your target.  Now, if you were to simply rotate that club "up" such that only the toe is on the ground and the heel is off, where is that pencil pointing?  It's pointing to the right of the target.  Simple as that.  The opposite is true of clubs that are too upright ... that "normal to the clubface" vector will be pointing left of your target.

There is no rule that says it's impossible to draw a ball with clubs that are too flat, but the general rule will be that they will tend to start a pinch right of target more than you'd like.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

I'm no expert, by any means, but I think it's even simpler than that.  (Your answer may also be true, but I think the following is as well :))

If you rest a club (a right handed iron) on the ground so it sits perfectly flat and attach a pencil (or anything pointy) to the center of the clubface pointing exactly perpendicular to said club face, it will point up in the air some amount, and directly at your target.  Now, if you were to simply rotate that club "up" such that only the toe is on the ground and the heel is off, where is that pencil pointing?  It's pointing to the right of the target.  Simple as that.  The opposite is true of clubs that are too upright ... that "normal to the clubface" vector will be pointing left of your target.

There is no rule that says it's impossible to draw a ball with clubs that are too flat, but the general rule will be that they will tend to start a pinch right of target more than you'd like.

Wow, interesting....*runs off to grab 7-iron, pencil, and scotch tape, tells wife he's reinacting a  MacGyver episode*

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm thinking the misses right are a result of the lie - the "pencil perpendicular to the center of the clubface" effect. Perhaps my misses left, (generally starting just right, and drawing/hooking too much) are a result of subconsciously compensating for the lie issue. Who knows. I got my 5iron bent just one degree upright, so I'll take that to the range and see if there's any impact. If there is, I saved myself a few $hundred, but don't get to club shop after all.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • New GolfNow layout is Awful
      Every customer is different, some know exactly what they want and expect you to execute their vision.  Others want more consultation and input from the designers as to what others are doing or what trends are on the rise.  Another factor is maintenance, how much time is required to keep the site updated, can the business maintain the site on their own or must that be outsourced, etc. There are numerous reasons why a business would redesign their site, such as; The business has undergone some fundamental changes that they want reflected in a new website The cost of maintaining the current site is too high The provider of their data has changed the feeds or discontinued certain elements of the data. Users have complained about how the site works The site is outdated or dependent on outdated technology or servers. They want a site that is "responsive" meaning the same site works on desktop, tablet and smart phones. I've never done work for a business that said they want to make their site worse, less user friendly, less functional or more frustrating for their customers to use.  My guess is that given the popularity of sites like GolfNow, that some standards were created for how the data would be distributed and updated to the GolfNow like websites from the different courses to make it easier for them all to get the data (the same thing happened to the airline industry).  The change to the backend likely warranted the changing of the front end as well. In some cases compromises must be made.  I've redesigned sites that were written in HTML, PHP and jQuery which are not easy for end users to maintain and update themselves.  The client wanted a responsive site that they could maintain easily on their own.  I suggested we develop the new site using Joomla, Drupel or WordPress as those platforms provided them with everything they requested.  They ultimately ended up with a WordPress site that was responsive and very functional but because of the platform certain nuances of the old site were lost. Users initially complained but we worked out some issues and over time they appreciated the more frequent updates and ability to easily view the site on their iPads and cell phones.  Website redesign like life is full of compromises.
    • Shorts On the PGA Tour (Updated 2013, 2016)
      I don't think the PGA Tour's stance on this has only to do with "tradition." Ultimately the PGA Tour is a member-run organization. If they strongly wished for shorts, they'd vote to allow it. That they've not done so speaks volumes, IMO.
    • Donald Trump for president?
      I heard something on the radio along the lines of New Hampshire having "super delegates" that will vote for Clinton regardless of yesterday's vote.  As far as Trump goes, my bottom line  is that he simply is not electable. Moderates, women and minorities aren't going to vote for that guy.    
    • Donald Trump for president?
      Just to clarify, I consider myself a committed Trump supporter, I like him. I am not a conservative in the traditional sense. Like anyone, I don't agree with every position that my candidate stands for, I do, however, agree on his main points re: immigration. 
    • Putting downhill vs uphill (2x distance of downhill length) poll
      Yep.  The first hole at TPC looks like they buried an elephant.  I lost a playing partner on that green. The course in the above posts I believe is The Bayou Club.  Checking tonight.  Not sure the hole number yet, but the green is next to the road.  If that's the course, I'll work out the hole number.  Their scorecards don't show hole layout, so I'll have to walk through the holes on the card. BTW, there is (or was) a hole at the Corry Pa muni (North Hills) that could have a 225 foot putt.  That's over 70 yards!  They don't make like that any more! Plus, the Links of Lake Bernadette has a shared green.  Haven't played there in a while, but as I recall the green was "U" shaped with bushes in the "U".  Had to putt to the bottom of the "U", then back on the other side.  Need to Google that later. St Andrews has shared greens but I don't recall any being like that.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. TessaEdin
      TessaEdin
      (24 years old)
  • Blog Entries