Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5410 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've got one local shop, but I think the guys their are morons and don't trust them as far as I can throw them. I was wondering if there was a way to tell how much I need my club angle adjusted so I can just go in and tell the guy what I want. I know they need to have the end of the club angled up through looking at the dirt line across the face of the club, just not sure how much.

thanks


Posted

Usually, they put some impact "tape" on the bottom edge of your 8 iron and then have you hit a ball off of a plastic lie board. The marks made when the taped bottom edge of your club hits the plastic board indicates what part of the sole is hitting. They should do this a few times until your impact mark is in the center of the sole of your club.

You will know whether or not they are doing this well or not.  It is a very simple process.

If you really wanted to do it yourself, you should be able to purchase the tape and board, but I can't think that it would really be worth it.

If the only thing that they do is look at the dirt line on your clubface, I wouldn't let them proceed.

The adjustment should be a precise response to your swing plane.

Titleist 910D2 10.5* Stiff / Taylormade 3 Wood - Superfast 2.0 15*  3 Superfast 2.0 Rescue 18* Stiff Shafts


Posted

The general rule of thumb for most irons when using impact or electrical tape on the sole of the club is 1° of lie adjustment for every 1/4" the mark is off from the center of the face, as measured from the center of the mark itself.  Clubs with very curved soles can be 1/4" = 1-1/2° or more, and on clubs with very flat soles 1/4" = less than 1°.  (Golf Club Fitting and Performance, pg. 206)

EACH club should be checked and adjusted, not just checking one club and adjusting the rest of the set accordingly.  There is a (very loose) industry standard of +/- 1° tolerance in lie angles, and adjusting the entire set based off of one club can still throw the rest of the set off.

Example:

Club  -  Advertised lie (+/-1°)  -  Actual lie

5  -       61.0°  -                          61.0°  (+/-0°)

6  -       61.5°  -                          62.5°  (+1.0°)  1.5° more than the previous club

7  -       62.0°  -                          61.0°  (-1.0°)  1.5° less than the previous club

8  -       62.5°  -                          62.5°  (+1.0°)  1.5° more than the previous club

9  -       63.0°  -                          63.5°  (+0.5°)  1.0° more than the previous club

^^^ Easy to see why each club should be adjusted individually and not the entire set adjusted based on one club.

lie_tape3.png


Posted

Fitting a given length club for lie angle seems pretty mechanical.  What seems to me to be more challenging is trading off between lie angle and length.  For example, in Ping G10 clubs the Silver code 7 iron at 1 inch over has the same lie angle and length as the White code 6 iron at 1/2 inch over and the same lie angle and length as the Maroon code 5 iron at standard length.  The swingweghts will be different, about D6 for the 1 inch over, D3 for the 1/2 inch over and D0 for the standard length (excluding wedges).  What makes one combination better than another?


Posted

Swingweights will be different due to the added length of the club, and no correction made to the weight of the heads.

Length and lie are directly related, and when fitting the order should be length first, then lie.  Given the same posture and hand position, lengthening or shortening the cub will change the the lie angle as the golfer hold the club.  "Typical" (and I use that term loosely) clubs are built in 1/2" length increments, and .5° lie increments.  Some sets are built in 1/2" length increments and 1° lie increments, and some have no rhyme or reason as to the increments they choose (Taylormade, I'm looking at you!).

So, the longer the club, the flatter the lie must be to fit the golfer.  Consequently, the shorter the club, the more upright the lie must be to fit the golfer.

I can't speak to Ping's color coding, as I have never looked at it or know what color means what.


Posted

Ping's color chart is found here:

http://www.ping.com/uploadedFiles/Custom_Fitting/PING_Color_Code_Chart.pdf

The color codes are .75 degrees apart.

Ping's irons are 1/2 inch apart and .75 degrees apart in lie:

G15® Iron Specifications

Club Length Loft Lie Offset Bounce Swgt.
3 38.75" 20.0° 59.25° .32" -2.0° D0
4 38.25" 23.0° 60.00° .30" 0.0° D0
5 37.75" 26.0° 60.75° .28" 2.0° D0
6 37.25" 29.0° 61.50° .26" 4.0° D0
7 36.75" 32.0° 62.25° .24" 6.0° D0
8 36.25" 36.0° 63.00° .22" 8.0° D0
9 35.75" 40.0° 63.75° .20" 9.0° D0
PW 35.50" 45.0° 64.00° .18" 10.0° D2
UW 35.50" 50.0° 64.00° .15" 11.0° D2
SW 35.25" 54.0° 64.25° .13" 12.0° D4
LW 35.00" 58.0° 64.50° .10" 12.0° D6


Posted

My clubs are 3* upright, White code, and 1 inch extra in length.  The swingweight is D6.  I probably could also fit clubs 3.75* upright and 1/2 inch extra length, or 4.5* upright and standard length.  The swingweight would change, but I would have some clubs with the same length and lie in each set.  My 7 iron would match, in length and lie, the 6 iron in the hypothetical Silver code set and the 5 iron in the hypothetical Maroon code set,  The swingweight would probably be D3 in the Silver code set and D0 in the Maroon code set.  The question I have is how does the fitter get the length right in choosing among the alternatives?


Posted


Originally Posted by Skier

The question I have is how does the fitter get the length right in choosing among the alternatives?


Your skill level will be the first determining factor, that being your ability to hit the same spot on the club face consistently.  Wrist-to-floor measurements are just used as a starting point to pick a shaft length to start the fitting, but certainly cannot be used as the sole basis for length (everyone has a different stance, a different posture, arms/legs/upper torso ratios will almost never be the same).  From there, placing impact decals on the club face and hitting balls with different length shafts and watching where on the club face you are making impact.  When you are making impact consistently on the center of the face, you have pretty much found your ideal length.  From there it is a matter of building/adjusting the length up and down the set from that iron.


Note: This thread is 5410 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Ok, I'm trying to find a feel to hit a consistent ball flight (irons).  My current predicament.  1. I try to do the arms down stuff better, with the club feeling like it is way behind me more. It's just a cluster of results. Most of the time, I can't get any speed on the swing. If I get my arms down faster, I just throw them out.  2. I focus all my attention on turning better. Pushing off with my left leg and getting my right side through better. On the DTL view, this doesn't produce anywhere close where the hands and club should be. The result is usually ball first contact, lower ball flight, more centered contact.  At this point, I am going with option 2. Stop thinking about what the hands do. Just make a shorter backswing, keep it wide, turn through. Somehow, the club head finds the ball. My focus is so much on just making sure I turn, it's like, "Oh, that contact was better.... Oh, that bell flight looks playable." If not, I will just be practicing my entire summer.       
    • Nope, they spent too much money. They are in over 28 million on the football roster and related NIL compensation at this point. Boosters associated with any Texas college football team has HUGE sway. The AD is between a rock and a hard place. They put a lot of money into Sorsby, at the chance of winning a NC this year. If you move on, you basically wasted a lot.  This is why Ohio State wants 3 QB's they feel can start. That is why the backups the past 5 years at some point transfer. Texas Tech has no backup near the quality of Sorsby. If they move on, they are screwed for 2026. 
    • Maybe there's something I still don't understand about the situation. Wouldn't Texas Tech do itself a favor to move on from Sorsby at this point?      
    • Day 281 6-10 Full swing, fast, getting low point ahead of "towel".  Working on flow during this seems to help. 
    • Wordle 1,817 3/6 ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟩⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.