Jump to content
IGNORED

What determines swing speed in an individual?


henderson14
Note: This thread is 4370 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Independent of form, how much of swing speed is strength, and how much is other natural factors like types of muscle fibers etc.  For example, in baseball strength has little to do with how fast you can throw a ball.  A pitcher might not have much strength at all, but still throws fast.  Does someone who can swing a bat fast or throw a ball fast have a faster golf swing, if they have the same form?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Swing speed requires mostly fast twitch muscles. Obviously, you need to have muscle in the first place to hit it, but lifting too heavy of weights can actually hinder your swing and thus the speed you can generate. If you're looking at lifting weights I would recommend a program  with lighter overall weights, but more reps and flexibility exercises. Someone who can hit homerun after homerun might not generate a lot of clubhead speed, just because a baseball bat is much heavier than a golf club (wooden ones, anyways) and require more brute strength. Really, it all comes down to technique. The further you can get the club to lag behind your hands, the faster your club will go as you whip it through impact. This does, however, require the strength and flexibility to be able to coil and uncoil more than any other one motion. Look at Rory McIlroy as an example: He is 5'10", and still generates 120 mph of clubhead speed. It's because his hips uncoil almost twice as fast as an average golfer, not because he has amazing strength. In fact, his hips uncoil fast enough that somewhere after impact, if you watch very high speed tapes, you will see his hips stop and actually REVERSE direction, in almost a recoil fashion, for only a few frames. That reverse is almost as fast as the average golfer comes around forward, and shows just how fast his hips are moving. They have to come back because of how the muscles connect, just so he avoids tearing them. That is an almost perfect example (in my opinion, at least) of how lagging the hands behind the club and the club behind the hands will create additional swing speed and longer drives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by Tyler

Swing speed requires mostly fast twitch muscles. Obviously, you need to have muscle in the first place to hit it, but lifting too heavy of weights can actually hinder your swing and thus the speed you can generate. If you're looking at lifting weights I would recommend a program  with lighter overall weights, but more reps and flexibility exercises. Someone who can hit homerun after homerun might not generate a lot of clubhead speed, just because a baseball bat is much heavier than a golf club (wooden ones, anyways) and require more brute strength. Really, it all comes down to technique. The further you can get the club to lag behind your hands, the faster your club will go as you whip it through impact. This does, however, require the strength and flexibility to be able to coil and uncoil more than any other one motion. Look at Rory McIlroy as an example: He is 5'10", and still generates 120 mph of clubhead speed. It's because his hips uncoil almost twice as fast as an average golfer, not because he has amazing strength. In fact, his hips uncoil fast enough that somewhere after impact, if you watch very high speed tapes, you will see his hips stop and actually REVERSE direction, in almost a recoil fashion, for only a few frames. That reverse is almost as fast as the average golfer comes around forward, and shows just how fast his hips are moving. They have to come back because of how the muscles connect, just so he avoids tearing them. That is an almost perfect example (in my opinion, at least) of how lagging the hands behind the club and the club behind the hands will create additional swing speed and longer drives.


Very informative post.  So now I'm wondering if it can be broken down in percentages between form, strength, types of muscle fibers, flexibility, coil/uncoil, etc.....I has to have been studied?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by henderson14

Very informative post.  So now I'm wondering if it can be broken down in percentages between form, strength, types of muscle fibers, flexibility, coil/uncoil, etc.....I has to have been studied?

Yes, that sounds like something that would be very helpful, perhaps adding tips on how to spot a deficiency of any one piece by looking at a swing video so you know how you can improve your swing. Don't get me wrong, I'm not thinking it's all about distance, but a little extra distance off the tee without sacrificing accuracy is always helpful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4370 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • https://static1.squarespace.com/static/603d222df4a6a57df7ef3e29/t/663cdba5d89e3a1848dab8d1/1715264422455/US_DIS_ILND_1_24cv3749_d34676497e293_COMPLAINT_filed_by_SuperSpeed_Golf_LLC_Jury_Demand.pdf The full complaint is there, but  basically, SuperSpeed (SS*) is claiming the Stack System (SS*) Stack System’s [sic] produces inflated metrics later used to, [sic] mislead and deceive consumers. Stack System’s marketing materials inflate apparent swing speed and distance gains through selective presentment of data without qualification that purported gains are not the result, in whole or part, of its training protocol and products. * Yes, I'm joking about abbreviating both "SS." SuperSpeed wants: A judgment that the Stack System has disseminated false and/or misleading information in violation of federal and Illinois law. The deletion of all false advertising distributed and recall of all packaging containing false advertising and a requirement that Stack System issue notices (written or otherwise) to that effect to all current distributors and retailers of its products and all distributors with whom Stack System has done business in the past eighteen months. Written confirmation within 30 days of an injunction detailing the manner and form in which Stack System has complied. An order that Stack System disseminate corrective advertising informing consumers, the trade, and the public of Stack System’s unlawful conduct. 3X all profits received by Stack System as a result of its unlawful actions. 3X all damages sustained by SuperSpeed (as a result of Stack System’s actions) The cost of the action All reasonable attorney fees All other relief to which SuperSpeed are entitled and such other or additional relief as just and proper. Oy.
    • I'm not doing this for the hundred and twentieth time. Sorry in advance, but you get the massively abridged version. Those guys also benefited from the weaker/shallower fields. Also, Watson's career doesn't overlap with Jack's like many think it did. Tom is nearly a decade younger. Jack won only like four majors only after Tom won his first. And Tom won more British Opens than he did all three of the other majors combined, as it was his specialty (not Jack's). Arnie's career similarly doesn't overlap Jack's as much as many think.   Jack would also tell you Tiger was the better golfer.
    • Weaker depth of fields for sure. Some of the top level guys with Jack were pretty awesome. Tom Watson had the lead on the 72nd hole of the 2009 British Open, an event where Tiger missed the cut. Old Tom was almost 60 years old. Jack himself at age 58 finished Top 10 at The 1998 Masters and scored better than Tiger, who won The Masters by 12 shots just a year before that.   The success of both Tom & Jack in older age gives some hope that maybe Tiger can find the magic again at some point. He’s still trying to figure out how to build the stamina for 72 holes after the leg injury. I would love to see him jump on the leaderboard in the coming years. I know a lot of people have given up on him at this point, but that was also true from 2014 to 2017 with the back injuries. He had a hell of a resurgence in 2018 & 2019. Would be fun to see it again. 
    • Perceptive rules question by caddie unlocks Tour pro’s ‘dead zone’ relief A perceptive rules question by Xander Schauffele’s caddie, Austin Kaiser, unlocked “dead zone” relief during the Wells Fargo Championship.
    • I ran across an interesting new clip, Johnson Wagner went into that spot with the Referee who allowed the relief.  Apparently there was a perfectly reasonable shot to be made, as Johnson clearly demonstrated, so relief from the TIO was perfectly appropriate.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...