Jump to content
IGNORED

Ballistics of Ball-Striking, or, How Come Drivers have arounf 12* Loft


Ole_Tom_Morris
Note: This thread is 3986 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

This came out today in that mine of golfing lore, Forbes: http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevensalzberg/2013/04/29/the-physics-of-golf-whats-the-ideal-loft-to-hit-the-ball-farthest/ Very short explanation of how it is that drivers are not lofted at 45 degrees. Link to a scientific article with the formulas. [Excuse me, "the formulae." :)]

Carry Bag, experimental mix-- 9* Integra 320, TT X100 Gold shaft
MacGregor Tourney 2-iron circa 1979

High grass club: #5 Ginty
Irons: 3,4,8,9 Cleveland 588P RTG Proforce 95 Gold shafts
Hogan fifty-three Hogan 5612

Ping Kushin

Link to comment
Share on other sites


That article is very ... odd. I already knew if was spin, but I guess I never really thought about the first guy to come up with that. Still, it's a strange read. I do like the equations and graphs in the linked PDF. That was neat.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It was satisfying to read.
However, how good an explanation is it today? I mean, both balls and drivers are way different from those available in 1983. Dimple design differs. Different drivers of the same loft will produce different spin rates. The COR of a modern club is different from a wood or steel driver of 1983. Heck, even tees are available in more variety today, and the height of a tee has a big effect on distance.
And spin is not necessarily your friend if you're out for distance. The forward force on the ball is dissipated to the extent that loft creates spin -- and part of that pertains to materials and driver head design as well as golf ball design.. The right rate of spin will maximize distance but if the spin rate is too high or low the ball travels a shorter distance. Sure, the physics is the same as in 1983, but the equipment may give different optimums today when spin rates and lofts and distance are graphed.. Is this correct?
A fact that fascinates me is how pro gambler / golfers will grease the faces of their clubs with vaseline to increase distance. They want to reduce spin to get a more boring flight, with less diversion of force into spin.

Carry Bag, experimental mix-- 9* Integra 320, TT X100 Gold shaft
MacGregor Tourney 2-iron circa 1979

High grass club: #5 Ginty
Irons: 3,4,8,9 Cleveland 588P RTG Proforce 95 Gold shafts
Hogan fifty-three Hogan 5612

Ping Kushin

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3986 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...