Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast!
IGNORED

Nike Sasquatch 460 drivers

RichF

By RichF
in Clubs, Grips, Shafts, Fitting

 Share
Note: This thread is 6455 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

RichF Great Member

RichF

Posted
Posted
What's the Pros and Cons (non-square models):
* Nike Sasquatch 460
* Nike Sasquatch Tour 460
* Nike Sasquatch SUMO 460

Swingweight/feel, distance, workability, sound off the face, forgiveness, etc
TaylorMade R9 460 9.5°
TaylorMade R9 13°
TaylorMade RAC TP MB 3-PW
TaylorMade RAC TP 54°.10 / 58°.10
Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2

lordnazgul Established Member

lordnazgul

Posted
Posted
I have currently got the 460 (original) and a good friend has the tour version of the same, smae shaft and loft.

Having hit all of Nike's drivers i have to say for general use the original is the best, especially in terms of sound, the new ones sound awful. Although undeniably the new models are more forgiving, this is something i am not necessarily looking for, and when you are using 460cc of clubhead, there is plenty of room for error already.

If you are someone who slices, steer away from the tour version as it is designed to be more workable, hence it will slice more.

It is just a matter of trying them out and seeing, but my opinion is that the original is the best

Best look
Best sound
Great feel
Great workability and very forgiving
Great distance

Driver - 905r 9.5* with UST Proforce VT Stiff
3 Wood - SQ 3+ 13* with Grafallloy prolaunch blue Stiff
5 Wood - SQ 5* 19 with Aldila NV65 stiff
Irons - MP 67 3 + 5-PW 2deg Up + 1/2" with DG S300 shaft.
Wedges - SV 52/10 with true temper s400 BV Spin Milled 56/10 Wedge Flex BV Spin Milled 60/04...


  • 3 weeks later...
r7 425 Dedicated Member

r7 425

Posted
Posted
I believe the Tour doesnt have a closed face...I know the sumo has a higher MOI than the original

"People think the size of the head is most important. Wrong. It's getting a quality shaft. test different shafts to see which goes the straightest. Also, more degrees of loft on the head is better than less. Eleven degrees is about right."


Pinseeker81 Dedicated Member

Pinseeker81

Posted
Posted
Lets all just agree that squared drivers are liggity lameoooo

Can't agree with you or I'd have to sell mine

...the world is full of people happy to tell you that your dreams are unrealistic, that you don't have the talent to realize them. - Bob Rotella

Driver - Taylormade R1.
Fairway - Taylormade R9 15º.
Hybrid - A3OS 3 Hybrid.

Irons - Cast CCI 4-AW.

Wedge - SV Tour 56º wedge.


Dent Great Member

Dent

Posted
Posted
I have the Sasquatch 460

I love the sound, its not too quiet or too loud. And it makes a nice classic PING that you'd like to hear. I really dont know much about forgiveness, but on a mis-hit it seems to Still give you the distance you'd like, but obviouslly not the accuracy you'd like.

The Driver makes the ball very workable, and Distance is a whole nother story! WOW very impressed with the ammount of distance it can give you. The driver also feels very very light to me, and very easy to swing.
In My Bag

Driver: Sasquatch 460 9.5°
3 Wood: Laser 3 Wood 15°
5 Wood: r7 19° (Stiff)Irons: S58 Irons 4-PW Orange DotWedge: Harmonized 60°Wedge: Z TP 54°Putter: Tiffany 34"Balls: Pro V1 Shoes: Adidas Tour 360 IIThe Meadows Golf Coursewww.themeadowsgc.comAge: 16

nykfan4life Dedicated Member

nykfan4life

Posted
Posted
What's the Pros and Cons (non-square models):

Nike Sasquatch 460 - Very forgiving, some workability Nike Sasquatch Tour 460 - Lower moi, high workability Nike Sasquatch Sumo 460 - Very forgiving, good workability

Note: This thread is 6455 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up

  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).

  • Posts

    • DeadMan
      Wordle Daily Puzzle

      By DeadMan · Posted

      Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • coachjimsc
      Wordle Daily Puzzle

      By coachjimsc · Posted

      Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • boogielicious
      Wordle Daily Puzzle

      By boogielicious · Posted

      Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Clemsonfan
      PRGR Launch Monitor

      By Clemsonfan · Posted

      Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • Clemsonfan
      Differential vs Course Handicap

      By Clemsonfan · Posted

      As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

  I accept