Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1598 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

(edited)

Erik 

I found the below TPI AMM graph from one of your old posts in 2016   and its says that the +y axis for the 'Trail Wrist Angles ' is showing Pronation. Further there is a Kelvin Miyahiri you-tube that implies the same (see link below).

But then I was watching Jon Sinclair video with Larry Rinker (link below) and if you fast forward to 25:11  he shows  'Lead and Trail Wrist Angle'  graphs where the +y axis are both supination. He says that both forearms are supinating just after release .

I found this confusing , so I contacted the TPI Customer Services about this and got an email response from Dr Greg Rose who said:


"Not sure why your software is saying pronation. That is definitely a mistake and should say Supination. The graph clearly shows supination and no golfer is 34 degrees pronated at impact 
Not sure what version of software you are using and I know that AMM is no longer around - but that is wrong!"

 

So was the AMM  Trail Wrist Graph that you posted (and its table below) showing pronation in the +y axis in error? 

--------------------------

 

 

large.wrist_angles_junior.png.483e3a4c8e

 

Edited by iacas
embedded videos

Hobby is studying golf biomechanics (especially the kinetics) . No official handicap and play only 7-8  times a year for fun scoring between 81-85 . Don't practice and just use external focus cues to swing with a general appreciation of the physics involved. My favourite golf scientists are Dave Tutelman and Dr Sasho Mackenzie.


  • iacas changed the title to TPI Graphs Confusion - Need Help
  • Administrator

I'm not entirely sure what you're asking here. The lead wrist and the trail wrist behave in opposite ways: if one is supinating, one is pronating.

Could you be more specific with what you're asking?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Hi Erik

I was asking whether there was an error in the TPI 3D AMM reporting of  'Trail Wrist Angles' that you previously posted (copy above).

In fact , I've actually received another reply below from Dr Greg Rose (TPI) and he now confirms that there is/was an error.

""we helped AMM produce the avatar and gave them the data sets to use for normals on their software. It just looks like the report feature had the wrong unit (using a P instead of a S) in the report. But the graph looks good."

So it seems that Jon Sinclair is correct , there is some dual supination of the forearms happening after release (although some of the TPI 'Trail Wrist Angle' reports are labelling the Supination 'S' as Pronation 'P'.  

Hobby is studying golf biomechanics (especially the kinetics) . No official handicap and play only 7-8  times a year for fun scoring between 81-85 . Don't practice and just use external focus cues to swing with a general appreciation of the physics involved. My favourite golf scientists are Dave Tutelman and Dr Sasho Mackenzie.


  • Administrator
  On 12/12/2020 at 2:51 PM, Warlock said:

I was asking whether there was an error in the TPI 3D AMM reporting of  'Trail Wrist Angles' that you previously posted (copy above).

Expand  

It's not my graph. Why didn't you ask in the topic where it was posted?

  On 12/12/2020 at 1:02 AM, Warlock said:

large.wrist_angles_junior.png.483e3a4c8e

Expand  

At impact, the lead wrist shows 55° or so of supination (palm rotating up), and the trail wrist shows 36° of pronation (palm down).

So, what's your question?

B18-CBN-6-12-9.jpg

  On 12/12/2020 at 1:02 AM, Warlock said:

He says that both forearms are supinating just after release .

Expand  

I don't think that's really possible. The hands are linked - if the left one is rotating palm up, the right one is rotating palm down.

Note that I used my estimates of the numbers from the graphs. I see the actual numbers below, and should have used those.

P.S. You also need to consider the original measurements. For example, the trail wrist is 54° P at address, and at impact is 34° P, which means it's 17° "S" relative to where it started. You have to consider your frame of reference when you're talking about these things. Some will set address at 0° and show the change, others will set some external frame of reference as 0°.

P.P.S. As you've noted AMM stuff isn't used these days, so I haven't really considered them in some time. I think what I've said here is true and accurate, but if I've forgotten how they worked or what their frames of reference were or something… sorry.

P.P.P.S. Still not sure what your overall… well, what are you wanting to know?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)

I didn't post on the original thread  as I didn't think it had any relevance to my real question which is about the possibility of dual supination of the forearms after P5.5  (ie. approximately when the lead wrist starts to ulnar deviate). 

When I looked at the above graphs on the Sandtrap thread and also that Kelvin Miyahiri you-tube video , it gave me the impression that the lead forearm was supinating while the trail forearm was pronating just after P5.5 .  But after seeing the same type of graphs on the John Sinclair video (which I assume were retrieved from his TPI 3D AMM database of pga pro golfers) , he implied that the +y axis in the 'Trail Wrist Angle' graphs were measuring supination (not pronation) and that both forearms are supinating after P5.5.  He also suggested that dual forearm supination was happening in the downswing in this video below.

http://Chris Como and Jon Sinclair echoing my findings on supination - YouTube

With the help of Dr Greg Rose I think I have enough information to now decide that the original TPI 3D AMM graphs had a report bug and that 'Trail Wrist' pronation actually meant supination. 

John Sinclair is claiming that dual forearm supination is actually happening in pga pro tour swings and here is a graph below showing graphs for the Trail forearm.

SinclairRightForearmSupinationTwo.jpg

 

I've no more questions but if you disagree with the above, I'd welcome your opinions.

 

 

 

 

Edited by Warlock

Hobby is studying golf biomechanics (especially the kinetics) . No official handicap and play only 7-8  times a year for fun scoring between 81-85 . Don't practice and just use external focus cues to swing with a general appreciation of the physics involved. My favourite golf scientists are Dave Tutelman and Dr Sasho Mackenzie.


  • Administrator
  On 12/13/2020 at 2:22 AM, Warlock said:

With the help of Dr Greg Rose I think I have enough information to now decide that the original TPI 3D AMM graphs had a report bug and that 'Trail Wrist' pronation actually meant supination. 

Expand  

I don't think you can say that for sure, but whatever. We're past the days of AMM, so…

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1598 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Probably hurt him a small bit. I am pretty sure Ward didn’t throw. He probably over evaluated his skill. Which may be his entitled attitude. I agree with the pick at that point. I think he’s closer to an end of the day 2 pick than a day 1 prospect. There has been plenty of QB’s who had similar numbers that don’t thrive in the NFL. It’s easy to get a high comp% in college and put up big numbers. 1) Colorado had to score a lot to win, so they aired it out. 2) The level of competition is low.  Against FBS teams with a winning % he was 70% with 7.5 y/a. Lots of short easy stuff.  Versus Will Howard who had 75% with 9.5 y/a. That 2 y/a is huge.  Cam Ward, 67% at 10 y/a. Look at Joe Burrow, 75% at 10.2 y/a. He was unable to read defenses well enough against FBS teams with winning % to push the ball down field.  I get his o-line was bad, but Miami had an average O-line, not elite and there is a noticeable difference between the two QB’s. They should never been talked as 1A/1B.    
    • That's what I'd suggest you do ,post hole-by-hole, post an "x" for the holes not played,  unless directed otherwise by a Handicap Committee with approval from your state golf association.  "Par plus.." is no longer used, unless specific instructions are given.  Note that Clarification 3.2b/2 says it should be used "only when approved by the Authorized Association".
    • I have no idea if he's any good or not. I've only ever seen him play one game. I will say he probably got bad advice going into the draft. He should have done all the "Combine Stuff" at the combine. Refusing to throw at that combine hurt.  I disagree about what his game film shows. I'm no expert, but I tried to watch as much as I could this weekend. I think it's really hard to find any game film on him that's worth a pile of beans. He's either playing really inferior competition in which case the game film is worthless. Or he's immediately running for his life the moment the ball is snapped. In which case the game film is worthless. He should have gone through the combine stuff. That was a huge mistake.  I do think it's a great pick for the Browns in the 5th round. Why not take him at that point? I think he has a chance to develop into something. Completing 75% of his passes, for 4100 yards, 37 TD's with only 10 picks behind that terrible offensive line is pretty good numbers. He may stink out loud at the next level, but being picked in the 5th round means he isn't a bust. He's just a 5th round pick that didn't work out.  If he stinks. Who cares? .... The Browns have had plenty of bad quarterbacks over the last 25 years. 
    • This is how I understand it should be done, just treat those holes as not played.
    • Shedeur Sanders and the Gulf Between Self-Perception and Draft Reality - The Ringer The Colorado quarterback approached the draft process like a sure-fire first-round pick. After an unprecedented free fall, it was clear the NFL’s... “His college tape looked like Caleb Williams without the elite physical arm talent,” an NFC coordinator said. “I’m sorry: You can’t play that game at this level. So, you’ve got to be banking on him making a jump from a decision-making, in-the-pocket, on-time, under-pressure [perspective], where you don’t have evidence of that on tape. That, to me, is why people are going to be nervous about him. He’s not going to extend plays the way he did at Colorado. Nobody does, unless you’re Lamar (Jackson), Josh Allen, Kyler (Murray). Those guys are elite athletes. He’s not. So, it’s going to be a very different game he’s asked to play. I’m not saying he can’t do it. But that’s where the hesitation is going to come into play.” There is an honest assessment of his game. He is a pocket passer, with bad processing, waiting for the WR to get open. You throw in the level of competition he was facing; you got to downgrade him some more.  Yep, he is 100% a developmental guy because he needs to learn how to play QB from the pre-snap to post-snap looks and then making quick smart decisions. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...