Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×

Recommended Posts

Posted

Recently I got a used set and trying to research the hosel bore diameter proved inconclusive. Confirmed that Amp Cell irons have universal hosel bore but no confirmation on the Pro versions. One source did report that bore was for .355 taper shafts, where others suggested that bore should be the same universal bore as on non-pro versions.

My shafts are .355 taper and the 4 iron had a non-matching ferrule to the rest of the set.  Which is why I started down this road. What I found on my 4 iron was that it most definitely was a universal bore, and one I particularly disliked. The bottom of the bore has a very short and steep tapered section for centering .355 taper shafts. However, the top of the hosel is very loose regardless of .355 or .370 shaft. My final conclusion was that the bottom is centered by that short, tapered section, where the .370 shafts become VERY tight and the top section is not centered at all UNLESS using a collared ferrule that is a tight fit into the recess on the hosel.

On a .370 shaft I would trust this gap under the collared ferrule using shafting beads. But on a .355 shaft I would not trust this rather large gap to just globing a lot of epoxy, even with shafting beads. The frustrating part is that normal .355 to .370 shims do not work well as they are to tight at the bottom and to lose at the top. My solution was to fashion some aluminum shims that sit just under the ferrule but only extended down about 3/4 inch. However, fashioning these shims was a total PITA!

So far, this experience has made me not want to consider and/or buy any further Cobra products. However, yesterday I took the 5 and 7 iron to the range and I can say that it was a more than pleasant experience, so my opinion on Cobra has been considerably mitigated by that! On the downside, the reason I did not take a 6 iron was because it is making snapping sounds and from putting it in a vise, I can tell it is from the head coming lose from the shaft. My suspicion is that the person who mangled the 4 iron job also had a hand in the 6 iron situation. The troubling part being the uncertainty of it all. I really, really do not want to have the experience of launching an iron head down the fairway along with the ball!

Finally, I have to say that the report that the Pro version is .355 taper might be correct. My set is a flow set, so potentially the muscle back only version may be .355 while my flow irons are universal, yet another unknown.

Mike


Titleist 905T 10.5°, 5W Golfsmith SuperSteel 17°, 4W MacGregor Tourney laminate 21°, 3-P MacGregor Colokrom M85 reissue, Snake Eyes 54° and 58° wedge, Odyssey Dual Force 330 blade

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 24 (4 Dec 25) - Spent about an hour working with the new 55° wedge in the backyard.  Kept all shots to under 20yds.  Big focus - not decelerating thru downswing and keeping speed up with abbreviated backswing.  Nothing like hitting a low flighted chip with plenty of check spin and then purpose to float a pitch of similar distance.  
    • Day 114 12-4 Put some work in on backswing, moving the hips correctly, then feeling over to lead side. Didn't hit any balls was just focused on keeping flowy and moving better. I'll probably do another session tonight and add in some foam balls.
    • Didn't say anything about your understanding in my post.  Well, if you are not insisting on alignment with logic of the WHS, then no.  Try me/us. What do you want from us then?? You are not making sense. You come here and post in an open forum, question a system that is constructed with logic, without using any of your own and then give us a small window of your personal experience to support your narrative which at first sight does not makes sense.  I mean, if you are a point of swearing then I would suggest you cut your losses and humor a more gullible audience elsewhere. Good heavens.
    • I have access to far more data (including surveys and polls) than you do with your anecdotes. I mean this as plainly and literally as possible: you’ve demonstrated that you do not. They would, one way or the other.
    • Yes, but you don't live in the UK, so you have no idea what we think about it here. It's a very different mindset here, to demonstrate the fact you should consider 9 out of 10 games we play here are Stableford, whereas you you almost solely play medal. Neither is right or wrong, it's just different  I'm trying to avoid swearing here. Once again, and for the 1000th time, I understand the system, I just don't agree with it. Is there anything wrong with that? PS, I do not have the time or patience to post my results, especially as they prove nothing  That's because 99% of the posters are Yanks
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.