Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6403 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Hi Everyone,

I'm a wedgeaholic and see many topics on this subject so I thought I might make a post on it.

I own all three wedges and all three are in play at the moment. The CG12's and x-forged are in my normal bag and i use the vokey SM's for pitch and putt (greens are rock hard, impossible to make pitch marks).

ok so here it is:

Feel:

x-forged are the softest feeling followed by the SM's then by the CG12's. The CG12's are firm stainless steel and though they don't feel bad they aren't the best for feel. They are abit firm and muted in feedback compared to the others.

Between the x-forged and SM, the x-forged has the mellow buttery feel similar to the mizuno's. You do not get the same mellowness from the SM's.

Spin:

SM's spin the most for the partial wedge. For this reason i use them for pitch and putt. I find their spin excessive for full swings but their ability to apply spin for the 1/2 to 3/4 swings is invaluable.

x-forged with MD's are up their with the SM's but don't bite quite as much. Full swing the x-forged also spin the ball excessively.

The CG12's spin well, best of the lot out of the rough but partial swings just don't get the same purchase on the ball...

Destroying the ball:

SM's and x-forged with MD's both ruin the ball... the CG12's on the other hand i've found to be quite ball friendly.

Durability:

After 4 months, the x-forged and the SM's show wear. The groves are shallower. For the SM's the micro groves at the sweet spot are almost gone now.

The CG12's, though scratched up, the groves are virtually unaffected.

Sand/rough:

I find the CG12's easiest out of the sand, they are large and heavy and glide through. I found the SM's to be most difficult in the sand due to their small head size and lighter head weight.

Appearance:

x-forged are roundish, SM's give you the feeling that you can aim for a 10 inch radius and the CG12's appear abit clumsy in this crowd. They look and feel like blunt instruments next to the SM's which are like surgical instruments.

Forgiveness:

CG12's are the most forgiving of the bunch in terms of sweet spot (as expected, largest head) and ability to cover up fat shots.

SM's and teh x-forged are line ball in this respect. They demand precision but in return give you precision.

Conclusion:

I wouldn't change my current setup but if the CG12's were made out of the x-forged material, then i'd be much happier...

A couple of my friends have the CG14. I personally can't handle the fact it's got an insert but if you can it's a better club than the CG12. It's more forgiving and softer in feel.

thanks.

Driver SS 93-95mph
6 iron SS 77-80mph

Driver: Burner 9.5 S
3 Wood: G10 SIrons 3-pw: MP-57 Dynalite Gold SL S300Wedges: 52 and 56 CG12 60 X- Forged CG/MDPutter: TiffanyBall: NXT TourI have no brand loyalty


Posted
Good review.

I recently changed from CG10s to Vokey SM and I agree that they are not the easiest to hit out of the sand but the are great for pitching and offer a lot of control.

In the bag:

driver Big Ben CS3 9.5º
3-wood 906F4 15.5º
hybrid rescue mid 19ºirons: MP-60 3-PWwedges vokey spin-milled 54º and 60ºputter tracy IIball Pro V1


Posted
good review. I used to have the cg12's and they were beautiful out of the sand. The vokeys however lack out of the sand. But the vokey's out perform on everything else, and have the nice square head that gives you confidence.

Driver Launcher 7.5 YSQ Xshaft
2Hybrid Rescue Hybrid 17*
Irons Tour Preferred 3-PW
Wedges Vokey 52*
Wedges Vokey SM 60*Putter Abaco 33"Ball TP/Red/LDP or Penta TP


Posted
the x forged's are amazing out of the sand. i really dig the way they work.

Note: This thread is 6403 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.