Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6589 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Hi Everyone,

I'm a wedgeaholic and see many topics on this subject so I thought I might make a post on it.

I own all three wedges and all three are in play at the moment. The CG12's and x-forged are in my normal bag and i use the vokey SM's for pitch and putt (greens are rock hard, impossible to make pitch marks).

ok so here it is:

Feel:

x-forged are the softest feeling followed by the SM's then by the CG12's. The CG12's are firm stainless steel and though they don't feel bad they aren't the best for feel. They are abit firm and muted in feedback compared to the others.

Between the x-forged and SM, the x-forged has the mellow buttery feel similar to the mizuno's. You do not get the same mellowness from the SM's.

Spin:

SM's spin the most for the partial wedge. For this reason i use them for pitch and putt. I find their spin excessive for full swings but their ability to apply spin for the 1/2 to 3/4 swings is invaluable.

x-forged with MD's are up their with the SM's but don't bite quite as much. Full swing the x-forged also spin the ball excessively.

The CG12's spin well, best of the lot out of the rough but partial swings just don't get the same purchase on the ball...

Destroying the ball:

SM's and x-forged with MD's both ruin the ball... the CG12's on the other hand i've found to be quite ball friendly.

Durability:

After 4 months, the x-forged and the SM's show wear. The groves are shallower. For the SM's the micro groves at the sweet spot are almost gone now.

The CG12's, though scratched up, the groves are virtually unaffected.

Sand/rough:

I find the CG12's easiest out of the sand, they are large and heavy and glide through. I found the SM's to be most difficult in the sand due to their small head size and lighter head weight.

Appearance:

x-forged are roundish, SM's give you the feeling that you can aim for a 10 inch radius and the CG12's appear abit clumsy in this crowd. They look and feel like blunt instruments next to the SM's which are like surgical instruments.

Forgiveness:

CG12's are the most forgiving of the bunch in terms of sweet spot (as expected, largest head) and ability to cover up fat shots.

SM's and teh x-forged are line ball in this respect. They demand precision but in return give you precision.

Conclusion:

I wouldn't change my current setup but if the CG12's were made out of the x-forged material, then i'd be much happier...

A couple of my friends have the CG14. I personally can't handle the fact it's got an insert but if you can it's a better club than the CG12. It's more forgiving and softer in feel.

thanks.

Driver SS 93-95mph
6 iron SS 77-80mph

Driver: Burner 9.5 S
3 Wood: G10 SIrons 3-pw: MP-57 Dynalite Gold SL S300Wedges: 52 and 56 CG12 60 X- Forged CG/MDPutter: TiffanyBall: NXT TourI have no brand loyalty


Posted
Good review.

I recently changed from CG10s to Vokey SM and I agree that they are not the easiest to hit out of the sand but the are great for pitching and offer a lot of control.

In the bag:

driver Big Ben CS3 9.5º
3-wood 906F4 15.5º
hybrid rescue mid 19ºirons: MP-60 3-PWwedges vokey spin-milled 54º and 60ºputter tracy IIball Pro V1


Posted
good review. I used to have the cg12's and they were beautiful out of the sand. The vokeys however lack out of the sand. But the vokey's out perform on everything else, and have the nice square head that gives you confidence.

Driver Launcher 7.5 YSQ Xshaft
2Hybrid Rescue Hybrid 17*
Irons Tour Preferred 3-PW
Wedges Vokey 52*
Wedges Vokey SM 60*Putter Abaco 33"Ball TP/Red/LDP or Penta TP


Posted
the x forged's are amazing out of the sand. i really dig the way they work.

Note: This thread is 6589 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 10 (10 Jun 26) - Played in the midweek shootout at my home course - on aerated and sanded greens - day of trying to figure tempo to get the best roll on the greens.  Approach game was decently solid as was shots off the tee.  
    • Ok, I'm trying to find a feel to hit a consistent ball flight (irons).  My current predicament.  1. I try to do the arms down stuff better, with the club feeling like it is way behind me more. It's just a cluster of results. Most of the time, I can't get any speed on the swing. If I get my arms down faster, I just throw them out.  2. I focus all my attention on turning better. Pushing off with my left leg and getting my right side through better. On the DTL view, this doesn't produce anywhere close where the hands and club should be. The result is usually ball first contact, lower ball flight, more centered contact.  At this point, I am going with option 2. Stop thinking about what the hands do. Just make a shorter backswing, keep it wide, turn through. Somehow, the club head finds the ball. My focus is so much on just making sure I turn, it's like, "Oh, that contact was better.... Oh, that bell flight looks playable." If not, I will just be practicing my entire summer.       
    • Nope, they spent too much money. They are in over 28 million on the football roster and related NIL compensation at this point. Boosters associated with any Texas college football team has HUGE sway. The AD is between a rock and a hard place. They put a lot of money into Sorsby, at the chance of winning a NC this year. If you move on, you basically wasted a lot.  This is why Ohio State wants 3 QB's they feel can start. That is why the backups the past 5 years at some point transfer. Texas Tech has no backup near the quality of Sorsby. If they move on, they are screwed for 2026. 
    • Maybe there's something I still don't understand about the situation. Wouldn't Texas Tech do itself a favor to move on from Sorsby at this point?      
    • Day 281 6-10 Full swing, fast, getting low point ahead of "towel".  Working on flow during this seems to help. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.