Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6418 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Whether one driver or golf ball hits farther than another is an objective question that can be scientifically tested, yet too often we are force-fed user opinion surveys using relatively small sample groups. I've seen the occasional Golf Digest bar graphs showing distances and spin, but they are far from exhaustive because they don't tweak any variables, and they are a magazine, so they only list a handful of recently-released stuff (no historical context whatsoever).

I'm already guessing the answer is no, but are there places we can look to get objective test results for clubs and balls? It should be doable for anyone that has access to a robot and access to the equipment. Here are some examples of variables that should be tweaked (sampled at multiple values) for a driver test (forgive the layman's terms):
  • Club head speed
  • Club shaft (make, model, flex, length)
  • Forward/backward club face angle at impact
  • Upward/downward swing path at impact
  • Impact position on club face
  • Ball used in test

With results like these, we would be able to determine which club performs best for our play style (club head speed, tee height, etc.). Additionally, we would have much better insight into what kind of tweaks to make (depending on what club we own) to maximize our launch conditions. And we would finally know which clubs really are the most forgiving, or which are the farthest-hitting.

I have seen something close to this for golf balls at www.golfballtest.com , up until last year, that is. Unfortunately they have now become a pay site, although you can see the old contents by using the Way Back Machine. (If anyone has an opinion on the value of the redesigned pay site, please tell; maybe it's worth it.)

User opinions are a valuable resource, but with the amount of salesmanship floating around out there (especially with the magazine hype-machines) it is extremely difficult to separate perception from reality. The brand name alone is going to have a significant impact on user opinion results.

Posted
The best source for equipment reviews is yourself. Get out and hit a club, and if it dosent feel right, try another.
THE WEAPONS CACHE..

Titleist 909 D2 9.5 Degree Driver| Titleist 906f4 13.5 degree 3-Wood | Titleist 909 17 & 21 degree hybrid | Titleist AP2 irons
Titleist Vokey Wedges - 52 & 58 | Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 Putter | ProV1 Ball

Posted
They don't test variables like you want, but golfreview.com is a good site to get reviews from people who have used the products.
In the blue and tan grom Bag:

Driver r7 460 10.5*
Fairway Woods '07 Burner 15* and 18*
Irons 4-PW r7 XDWedges 47*, 52*, 58* CG14,Putter TiffanyBall One Tour D

Posted
Thanks for the suggestions so far, but unfortunately they are the opposite of what I'm looking for. TheSandTrap and golfreview.com are primarily subjective reviews. That's fine and plenty helpful in its own way, but it's not the science I'm looking for.

Posted
Thanks for the suggestions so far, but unfortunately they are the opposite of what I'm looking for. TheSandTrap and golfreview.com are primarily

This site has the most comprehensive and objective reviews.

I liked Golf Test USA and Rankmark over Golfreview and Golfgearreview. I do not like the Magazine ratings since there is limited objectivity. They started putting ball flight analysis but that is dependent upon the composite of testers (from scratch to 36 HCDP)

STR8 Dymo 10.5
Dymo 3W
Mid Rescue 3
MP-33 4-PW
Eidolon 52* GW LW, SW Titleist Bullseye Putter


Posted
With results like these, we would be able to determine which club performs best for our play style (club head speed, tee height, etc.). Additionally, we would have much better insight into what kind of tweaks to make (depending on what club we own) to maximize our launch conditions. And we would finally know which clubs really are the most forgiving, or which are the farthest-hitting.

In my mind, such an objective review is not possible or useful because the greatest variable in golf is the golfer himself. Even Tiger does not know what kind of swing he brings to the course that day..not on his first swing at least.

In the bag:
905R 9.5* Fujikura Speeder S
X 15* Fujikura R
X 19* Fujikura S
4-P MP-14 TT DGS300 53* 588 Gunmetal MP series 56-14 TT wedge MP-R 60-09 Rifle SpinnerDFX Two ball Pro V1


Posted
In my mind, such an objective review is not possible or useful because the greatest variable in golf is the golfer himself. Even Tiger does not know what kind of swing he brings to the course that day..not on his first swing at least.

While it is true that our swings will vary, it is also true that we will still have tendencies, and it would be wonderful to be able to narrow our club choices based on objective data that matches our tendencies. Think of a typical club demo session. You hit some clubs, observe the launch monitor, and try to draw conclusions based on limited data and gut feeling. How many clubs did you try? Likely not many. How many shafts? How can you be sure you are swinging like you normally do? How many shots are you even hitting flush? You are spending hundreds if not thousands of dollars on clubs based on a gut feeling; one that may change tomorrow, or one that may be plain wrong. Even if you read a bunch of reviews you are merely making judments based on someone else's experience, someone who probably doesn't swing like you. Science doesn't tell us everything we need to know, but it fills a big void left by our perceptions and our wild guesses.

Not only would good scientific data give us a good head start when trying to determine which clubs to look at, it may also give us better insight into how best to utilize the equipment we have. And besides, it's possible that there are some clubs that just perform better in almost every swing. That would be nice to know for once.

Posted
This site has the most comprehensive and objective reviews.

On the the contrary, while this site offers good, verbose reviews, they are very much subjective; almost entirely about look and feel. The only objective information is the specs they grab from the manufacturer. (This observation is based on the AP1 review.) And I agree with you about the magazines.


Note: This thread is 6418 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.