Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6419 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
My iron fitting showed I need 1-1.5 degrees upright and I should be set. That's getting done next week.

My driver was not so cut and dried. I have a Taylormade Burner 9.5 degree with the 50 gram stiff-flex Fujikura shaft. I hit on the launch monitor and got the following averages:

Swing speed: 104 MPH
Ball speed: 147 MPH
Launch angle: 18.2 degrees
Ball spin: 3,702 RPM
Carry: 247 yards
Total: 269 yards
PTR: 141

His observations were as follows: my spin rate and launch angle are too high. He said I should be down around 13 degrees or so and my spin rate should be more around 3,000 RPM. He attributed it to the shaft in my driver. So, he gave me a Ping G10 that was 9 degrees with a supposedly mid-high kickpoint Grafalloy Pro Launch Red (this was supposed to be more for a shaft comparison). My averages there were this:

Swing speed: 105 MPH
Ball speed: 150 MPH
Launch angle: 18.5
Ball spin: 3,740
Carry: 254 yards
Total: 276 yards
PTR: 143

He was a little bit stumped. He still thinks I need a mid-high or high kickpoint shaft, but the numbers between the two shafts basically were the same. He thought my Burner was a low kickpoint and causing my high launch.

He seems to think I'm leaving a fair amount of distance on the table with these launch conditions. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Any specific shaft I should look at?

Thanks.

  • Administrator
Posted
Swing speed: 104 MPH

I'm suspicious of the numbers. At 105 MPH, carrying the ball 250is about the most you can reasonably expect, maybe 260 if you flat nail one. You weren't nailing them: 18.5° and 3700 spin. Your smash factor isn't quite up there either: 1.43. Ideally you'd like that a bit closer to 1.5.

So anyway, I wouldn't look at the yardages their machines are givin' ya. I think they're bunk. However, if you can trust the other numbers - the launch angle and spin - then yeah, you definitely want to try to get to 13 or so and 3000. If the two drivers didn't work for you, I'd start to look at your technique next. It seems like you might have been hitting down on the ball a little - that'd cut your smash factor a little and add more spin. But it doesn't explain the high launch. So who knows - maybe the machine is all goofed up, and you can't trust any of the numbers. Someone with more experience at actually using fitting machines could probably help you better than I could here. Everardo?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Just a couple of questions. Why did he not give you a higher kickpoint shaft? Also, what balls were you using? The ones you play with?

FWIW, my fitting numbers were similar. The recommendation was made to go to a lower torque shaft, higher kickpoint and a little heavier, 75 grams. Was that the only shaft he gave you? Was there a limited availability?

Titleist 905T Accra SC75 M4 Shaft

Nike SQ 4W Accra T70 M4 Shaft
HB001 17* Hybrid with Mitsubishi Diamana Thump X Stiff Flex
Baffler Pro 20* Accra Axiv 105 Tour Hybrid Shaft

Taylor Made 24* Burner Accra Axiv 105 Tour Hybrid Shaft

Mizuno MP-32 5-PW Black Oxide Finish Project X 6.0 Shafts

Vokey 52* Oil Can Finish TTDG S400 Shaft

Cleveland 588 60* TTDG S400 Shaft

Rife Bimini Blade Putter

 

Ball-White and Round

 


Posted
As far as the reliability of the numbers, those yardages are what I can hit on the course. I would definitely never claim to be part of the 300 club, but I know I can hit the 260-270 total that is being listed. I've done it on the course several times.

I was using the exact ball I play with (Titleist NXT Extreme) on the monitor. As far as shaft availability, that was the only one he had me try. I'm not sure about other shafts/clubs being available.

  • Administrator
Posted
As far as the reliability of the numbers, those yardages are what I can hit on the course. I would definitely never claim to be part of the 300 club, but I know I can hit the 260-270 total that is being listed. I've done it on the course several times.

Then I'm not sure I'd trust the launch and spin numbers, or maybe the swing speed is off.

At 105 MPH, with near-perfect launch conditions, the furthest you could really expect to carry the ball consistently is 250-260. Something's suspect.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Here's a chart that I use for reference often. The numbers do look a bit tweaked, I'm wondering if the calibration is just a touch off but it's also hard to know without seeing your swing. The launch is too high so I'd try another shaft with a higher kickpoint or even a heavier shaft but it still it going to rely on your swing.

Is there another shop or fitter in the area that you can double check these numbers against?
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I have a lesson scheduled for this week to have my driver swing looked at. I'll see what progress is made there and re-evaluate. I'm sure there are other places, but I'll have to hunt them down. The only other place that I know of for sure would be Golf Smith, but are they going to be any better?

Posted
i reckon the numbers look fine, he is only claiming 247 yards Carry not 260 plus

smash factor of 1.43 or 1.44 is a lot better than most people would have you believe!

k

Posted
did you see where you are hitting the ball on the club face?
are they close to the top of the edge?
if they are, that might explain the angle and rpm.
i have the similar problem with my swing. a little bit over the top.
that's why i'm launching every driver 18, 19 degree with tons of rpm.

Launcher 460 10.5° <BB Solution 130 R>
Wishon 949MC 16.5° <SK Fiber Tour Trac 80 R>
3DX DC Ironwood 20°, 23° <UST SR2 R>
MX-23 5-PW <KBS Tour R>
Vokey 250.08, SM54.10, SM58.08 <DG Wedge> Callie 33.75"TLT Series 4MOI matched


Posted
I tend to hit around the middle of the face on the vertical axis. My inconsistency comes from heel to toe.

Note: This thread is 6419 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.