Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6368 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Sorry for this long setup:

Right now I'm using some large faced, cavity back irons and I like them. Since I bought them and started playing hardcore (avg. twice a week), I've dropped my handicap from 17 to 11.

Besides the amount of playing, I also took 10 individual lessons over a year ago that I think was the real reason I dropped to 11.

Now it seems the general consensus is that I would be outgrowing my current irons and should start using something in the "game improvement" class.

My question to you all knowledgeable lot is: do irons that give more feedback really make you a better golfer?

I demo'd some Mizuno MX-25's for two rounds. I thought they would be a good step to see what more feedback was like. I was not blown away. Ok, so I felt mishits more. The actual quality of the shots seemed pretty much the same however. Ironically, I didn't like how they felt!

With this information, I admit I don't hit the sweet spot a lot. So what do I do with that feedback? It would seem to me more lessons would be the answer. But more lessons should be the answer anyway if you want to improve as a golfer.

I'm not at a stage yet that I feel workability is desirable. I desire to hit it straight consistently!

Anyway, thanks for any opinions you have on this.

PS: BTW, I've seen that huge thread debating "muscle back v. cavity back". I was looking for the more specific answer to question above.
"I say pick it up a******. Put it in your pocket. You're lucky you found it. Go the **** home will ya?"

--George Carlin

Posted
From experience, nothing beats being able to get feedback from the golf club. Knowing where on the club face you are hitting the ball is vital to a few things like improving your swing and perhaps needing to adjust the lie. It also lets you know what a well struck shot feels like.

Additionally, if you're taking lessons, getting feeback from the club gives you an opportunity to ask your instructor more questions. He or she can then try to either fix your swing or see if there is an issue with the club.

Titleist 905T Accra SC75 M4 Shaft

Nike SQ 4W Accra T70 M4 Shaft
HB001 17* Hybrid with Mitsubishi Diamana Thump X Stiff Flex
Baffler Pro 20* Accra Axiv 105 Tour Hybrid Shaft

Taylor Made 24* Burner Accra Axiv 105 Tour Hybrid Shaft

Mizuno MP-32 5-PW Black Oxide Finish Project X 6.0 Shafts

Vokey 52* Oil Can Finish TTDG S400 Shaft

Cleveland 588 60* TTDG S400 Shaft

Rife Bimini Blade Putter

 

Ball-White and Round

 


Posted
I get alot of feedback on my mp33s. If I hit a thin shot, I know it immediately.

How about a combo set of blades and cavity back irons, something like PW - 7 irons blades and 6-4 iron cavity back with some hybrids for the longer irons.

Just my 2 cents.

Titleist 910 D2 9.5 Driver
Titleist 910 F15 & 21 degree fairway wood
Titleist 910 hybrid 24 degree
Mizuno Mp33 5 - PW
52/1056/1160/5

"Yonex ADX Blade putter, odyssey two ball blade putter, both  33"

ProV-1


Posted
The way you are describing your game, I think you still want the forgiveness of cavity backs. (i agree with you). I think that where you are in your game is similar to mine, and I want the forgiving irons to not penalize me soooooo much like the blades do. Feedback is a great thing, but where my game is now, I get plenty and can tell just enough to help me correct it, while not killing my round.

Note: This thread is 6368 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 116 12-6 Still working on getting to lead side. Tonight I also tried some skill work with clubface awareness.  Hit foam balls. 
    • To flog this subject even further, if that's even possible, this article from Golf Monthly just appeared today in one of my news feeds. Written by a golf writer in the UK who I never heard of, he's basically saying that there should be only 3-5 rounds from the most recent 20 that should count towards the average and only competitive rounds should count. He claims the erratic scorers would have less of an advantage than they do now. He makes a lot of references to "club golfers" in the UK being the ones who are mostly dissatisfied. https://share.google/qmZZBEoJvOxHxJGil  In my experience with my league where we have golfers with indexes ranging from 5 to 40, looking at the weekly results from the past two years, I can detect no pattern that would substantiate the claim that the current system gives an unfair advantage to either erratic golfers (aren't we all?) or higher handicappers. Apparently though, at least in the UK, this seems to be "a thing."
    • Day 26 (6 Dec 25) - Another day of rainy weather - got in some mirror work rehearsing forward weight shift as finishing back swing. 
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* 🟨⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 no eagle -  but a birdie is a nice follow-up
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.