Jump to content
IGNORED

New Nike Victory Line


Note: This thread is 5757 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I wouldn't switch over to Nike unless they're unbelievable..but I was just speaking to Jim from theironfactory since they'll be refinishing my clubs. he was telling me about Tiger's new clubs that he was working on before the open.

Copying is becoming a habit for them.

I don't think it's gonna be the same with MP-32. Mizuno Cut Muscle is a trade mark (patented technology?).
Attached are a pic of his irons. These are the ones that are scheduled to be released this fall.

looking real Mizuno-ish...

Second that.

What's in the bag:
Driver: r7 SuperQuad 10.5° ~ UST Proforce V2 65g Regular
Wood: 906F4 18.5° ~ Aldila VS Proto 80g Stiff
Irons: MP-60 3-PW ~ True Temper Tour Concept S3
Wedges: Vokey Oil Can 252.08, SM56.10 & SM60.08Putter: Marxman Mallet 33"
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

To he*l w/ some of your assessments that this new Nike line is basically a Mizuno in a Nike logo or Nike is copying them or whatever nonesense you doubters want to spew. Could it be that Nike really is right there w/ all other golf manufacturers? Just in the past couple years Nike has come a long way. To the point where they are "right there" w/ the "more pure" golf companies. I just think that some are scared and naive to acknowledge that and the others just refuse to believe that Nike can ever really be serious into this golfing thing.

Well, they are.

People will start to turn to Nike, even more than they are now.

Golf might have a new company leader within a few years.

TM R11/Titleist 910F 15*/ Nike SQ2 20* & 23*/ Nike CCi 5-PW/ Nike SV 52* & 56*/ SC Newport 2 Studio Style 32.5"
Nike 20XIx/Pro V1x

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I will also add that Nike has added the apeal to the younger crowd which was not really being to addressed by the big boys (Callaway, Taylor Made, Titleist..etc) Nike in some kids eyes made it cool to play golf! And I can admit to me being one of them. As a young kid I can remember all my uncles coming home to Fayetteville, NC and they would be gone for 2 to 3 days just playing the No 2 over at Pinehurst. And I always thought what a old mans game. But Nike kind of threw golf in your face. Now I kno there will be others who say differently but that is my personal take on it. And from playing old Nike stixs to todays Nike stixs there is a HUGE improvment. Nike forced there way in with Tiger and shotty equipment, but they will stay in with there advancments today!

In My Bag:

Sumo2 5900
Sasquatch 3w
Slingshot 2 Hybrid Slingshot 4-AW CG10 52* Forged 58* Studio Select Newport 1.5

Link to comment
Share on other sites


to all the people saying the Tigers blades look like Mizuno's, of course they do. With a chrome blade, there's not going to be a huge difference. It is a simple blade. I could go out and find 10 different pure blades from 10 different companies and you couldnt' pick out which one is which.

and tiger is completely involved in how his clubs are shaped, hes the one telling the people who forge and grind his clubs, how to do it.
In The Bag

Titleist 905T 9.5°
Nike Sumo2 15°
Nike Sumo2 19°Nike Forged Irons - 3-PW Titleist Bob Vokey Spin Milled 56°10°Scotty Cameron Pro Platinum Newport 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


To he*l w/ some of your assessments that this new Nike line is basically a Mizuno in a Nike logo or Nike is copying them or whatever nonesense you doubters want to spew. Could it be that Nike really is right there w/ all other golf manufacturers? Just in the past couple years Nike has come a long way. To the point where they are "right there" w/ the "more pure" golf companies. I just think that some are scared and naive to acknowledge that and the others just refuse to believe that Nike can ever really be serious into this golfing thing.

You don't think you are being the least bit bias do you? I really believe the main reason that Nike sells so well is that the company is able to throw money at people. They sell to the high-handicap public. You can see when Tiger first went to Nike, his clubs look almost exactly like the Titleist's he just switched from.

I will say that they are catching up. But, as far as clubmaking I don't think they will find there way out of their niche of making clubs for the high-handicapper, which is great.
I will also add that Nike has added the apeal to the younger crowd which was not really being to addressed by the big boys (Callaway, Taylor Made, Titleist..etc) Nike in some kids eyes made it cool to play golf! And I can admit to me being one of them. As a young kid I can remember all my uncles coming home to Fayetteville, NC and they would be gone for 2 to 3 days just playing the No 2 over at Pinehurst. And I always thought what a old mans game. But Nike kind of threw golf in your face. Now I kno there will be others who say differently but that is my personal take on it. And from playing old Nike stixs to todays Nike stixs there is a HUGE improvment. Nike forced there way in with Tiger and shotty equipment, but they will stay in with there advancments today!

This is exactly what Nike has done for Golf. I will say that Nike (with the help of a certain player) made golf popular. Nike has pushed the limits as far as apparel for golf. New materials for shirts and hats, no company can keep up.

Also, as far as thinking outside the box, Nike as a couple of things they others didn't think of. I remember they were the first company to popularize a combo set. And they were the first company to popularize square-headed drivers. The ideas are there, but the clubmaking is not.

In my bag:

DRIVER: 905T w/ Fujikura E360 Shaft
3 Wood 906 F4 w/ Aldila Proto "By You"
Irons: MP 30 w/ Rifle 5.5 Wedges Oil Can 50*, Vokey SM 54* and 58*Putter: C-06

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I will also add that Nike has added the apeal to the younger crowd which was not really being to addressed by the big boys (Callaway, Taylor Made, Titleist..etc) Nike in some kids eyes made it cool to play golf! And I can admit to me being one of them. As a young kid I can remember all my uncles coming home to Fayetteville, NC and they would be gone for 2 to 3 days just playing the No 2 over at Pinehurst. And I always thought what a old mans game. But Nike kind of threw golf in your face. Now I kno there will be others who say differently but that is my personal take on it. And from playing old Nike stixs to todays Nike stixs there is a HUGE improvment. Nike forced there way in with Tiger and shotty equipment, but they will stay in with there advancments today!

I agree about Nike appealing to the young crowd. But I think more than anything the fact they were so big before Tiger, and then once Tiger, well, turned into Tiger, people just want to have Nike clubs because it reminds them of Tiger and some people honestly think they are the best clubs out there just because Tiger plays them.

I personally don't really like anything Nike. The only thing I ever hit well that was Nike was the SV Tour wedge, and one of their putters had a real nice feel to it. Other than that, I can't stand the look of their clubs, the feel, how the sound, or anything...but to people who enjoy playing with their clubs, power to you.

Driver Ping G10 10.5*
Hybrids Ping G5 (3) 19* Bridgestone J36 (4) 22*
Irons Mizuno MP-57 5-PW
Wedges Srixon WG-504 52.08 Bridgestone WC Copper 56.13
Putter 33" Scotty Cameron Studio Select #2

Link to comment
Share on other sites


You don't think you are being the least bit bias do you? I really believe the main reason that Nike sells so well is that the company is able to throw money at people. They sell to the high-handicap public. You can see when Tiger first went to Nike, his clubs look almost exactly like the Titleist's he just switched from.

Have you not seen half of the other club making companies' follow their innovation with the square headed driver? Why do you say they will not find their way out of their niche for the high hanidicapper? Do you have statistics to support your thoughts that that is their niche? I think you should sample some of their stuff. Their R&D; is amazing. They know where to spend the money. Their clubs have caught up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Have you not seen half of the other club making companies' follow their innovation with the square headed driver? Why do you say they will not find their way out of their niche for the high hanidicapper? Do you have statistics to support your thoughts that that is their niche? I think you should sample some of their stuff. Their R&D; is amazing. They know where to spend the money. Their clubs have caught up.

Absolutely they have caught up. Totally agree. And to the person who said that Nike clubs are ugly, sound like crap, can't hit them well. I want to say what? I will admit my square driver makes quite the "pop" sound but hey, its an attention getter and a head turner. And after a 310 yard drive, is that a bad thing? As far as the look of the clubs, my CCi irons are gorgeous clubs. Check out the review on this here sight of those clubs.

I just think people still will always be against Nike, never give them a chance, call them ugly, say they just throw money at people to get them to use their equipment, etc etc...... But, for the person looking to get a new set or upgrade clubs, and for someone not biased against any companies, should really give Nike their due chance. If you don't like them, you don't like them. And I along w/ probably every other Nike equipment user wouldn't fault you at all for that.

TM R11/Titleist 910F 15*/ Nike SQ2 20* & 23*/ Nike CCi 5-PW/ Nike SV 52* & 56*/ SC Newport 2 Studio Style 32.5"
Nike 20XIx/Pro V1x

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Absolutely they have caught up. Totally agree. And to the person who said that Nike clubs are ugly, sound like crap, can't hit them well. I want to say what? I will admit my square driver makes quite the "pop" sound but hey, its an attention getter and a head turner. And after a 310 yard drive, is that a bad thing? As far as the look of the clubs, my CCi irons are gorgeous clubs. Check out the review on this here sight of those clubs.

I wasn't talking about the irons. I was talking about the driver. I find the Sumo2 to be an ugly face at address. I've never hit their irons I don't think. I did like the SV wedge as I stated before.

Driver Ping G10 10.5*
Hybrids Ping G5 (3) 19* Bridgestone J36 (4) 22*
Irons Mizuno MP-57 5-PW
Wedges Srixon WG-504 52.08 Bridgestone WC Copper 56.13
Putter 33" Scotty Cameron Studio Select #2

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I am a really big nike fan, and i'll have it to admit it's because of tiger. He's been my golf idol forever, and i learned he played nike clubs, so i gave them a try. i ended up loving them, and still do today.

the square driver is a great club, but it is the noise that drove me away. i cant stand it. the pga guy at our golf galaxy is 6'6", and hits his 5 wood 270.(i cant believe it either, but ive watched him hit. hes big.) He couldnt get the square driver over 280. but hey, its still a great club for everyone who isnt a giant beast. i hit it better than my SQ(generation 1), but im so attached to it i wont stop hitting it.
In The Bag

Titleist 905T 9.5°
Nike Sumo2 15°
Nike Sumo2 19°Nike Forged Irons - 3-PW Titleist Bob Vokey Spin Milled 56°10°Scotty Cameron Pro Platinum Newport 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


The 2008 models do not have that horrible noise like those in previous years.

Thank god, lol. I hated that in last years model.

Driver Ping G10 10.5*
Hybrids Ping G5 (3) 19* Bridgestone J36 (4) 22*
Irons Mizuno MP-57 5-PW
Wedges Srixon WG-504 52.08 Bridgestone WC Copper 56.13
Putter 33" Scotty Cameron Studio Select #2

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 5757 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Day 297: putted for about 25 minutes, working on 30 foot putts. Then went and hit balls for about an hour, just focused on getting the ball to go where I want it. Not my best session, but figured it out better at the end. 
    • I do use a 7 wood. Love it! Do have a specific question about 7 woods?
    • @DrizZzY does. 😄 
    • does anybody still use a 7 wood? if not what do you use instead>  
    • Day (2 May 24) - somehow I missed posting both Tues and Weds practice sessions - so the streak ends and a new one begins…. Focus today was on ball first contact using the Divot Board for reference.   Worked with 7i, 9i and GW hitting hard foam balls.  Started hap hazardly and then settled back into my pre-shot setup.  Much more consistent in the latter.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...