Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6347 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I'm able to get my hands on a new FT-5 through a buddy of mine for a great price. This is to replace my 1995 Great Big Bertha 8.5* stiff which I hit pretty well (not sure if that info helps).

He has two he'll sell me:
  • FT-5 Tour 10.5* stiff neutral
  • FT-5 9* stiff neutral (not Tour)

I'm less concerned with the open/closed face differences between these, but I'm curious about the loft differences. I've seen some posts about the Tour models having a higher center of gravity, resulting in a lower launch angle.

Can anyone weigh in as to how big a difference the 1.5* loft will make with these two drivers?

Many thanks!

Driver: FT-5 9* Neutral
3 & 5 Wood: SuperSteel
Irons: ISI Beryllium Copper
Sand Wedge: Ben Hogan piece of
Putter: White Hot


Posted
I switch from a 8.5* knock-off Titleist to the 907D2 9.5*. So that is only 1* degree of loft but my ball flight is alot higher now. I really liked the low penetrating flight before and it had more roll. I don't know much about the FT-5 but simply talking about loft I would go with the 9* because the 10.5* would likely go really high.

P.S. The shaft has a lot to do with it to. My old shaft was heavier and had a lower kick so now my new shaft hits it alot higher and it makes the ball fight way high with the high shaft and the loft diffierence.

In My Bag:
Driver: 907D2 9.5*
3 Wood: 906F2 13*
5 Wood: 906F2 18*
Irons: : MP-32: 3-PWWedges: : Vokey 54.10 and 60.4Putter: Circa 62 Charcoal Mist Model #6


Posted
Thanks Fredguay642,

That way my initial thought also, to stick with the lower loft. I was just wondering how the higher COG would effect the loft and if that would bring those two driver options (9* FT-5 &10.5* FT-5 Tour) closer together.

Driver: FT-5 9* Neutral
3 & 5 Wood: SuperSteel
Irons: ISI Beryllium Copper
Sand Wedge: Ben Hogan piece of
Putter: White Hot


Posted
I just found another theard named "FT-5 vs. FT-5 Tour" kind of answers you question. Look it up. but tradewind_golfer wrote

"Picked up the FT-5 Tour 10.5* neutral with the stiff E-360(?) shaft. This is
definitely a "tweaked" version of the standard model.

Ok, here's what I notice:
1. It's a bit heavier and feels even more "stable" throughout the swing
2. The COG does seem just a touch higher (the 10.5* tour launches a bit lower
than the 10*)
3. Misses tend to be spread out more evenly left and right of center (not all left
and more left like with the regular FT-5).
4. The .5* open face is hardly noticeable but perhaps subconsciously it looks like
you can let it go."

Hope it helps

In My Bag:
Driver: 907D2 9.5*
3 Wood: 906F2 13*
5 Wood: 906F2 18*
Irons: : MP-32: 3-PWWedges: : Vokey 54.10 and 60.4Putter: Circa 62 Charcoal Mist Model #6


Note: This thread is 6347 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 12: stole about 10 minutes in the garage, doing my drill with foam balls. 
    • Day 116 12-6 Still working on getting to lead side. Tonight I also tried some skill work with clubface awareness.  Hit foam balls. 
    • To flog this subject even further, if that's even possible, this article from Golf Monthly just appeared today in one of my news feeds. Written by a golf writer in the UK who I never heard of, he's basically saying that there should be only 3-5 rounds from the most recent 20 that should count towards the average and only competitive rounds should count. He claims the erratic scorers would have less of an advantage than they do now. He makes a lot of references to "club golfers" in the UK being the ones who are mostly dissatisfied. https://share.google/qmZZBEoJvOxHxJGil  In my experience with my league where we have golfers with indexes ranging from 5 to 40, looking at the weekly results from the past two years, I can detect no pattern that would substantiate the claim that the current system gives an unfair advantage to either erratic golfers (aren't we all?) or higher handicappers. Apparently though, at least in the UK, this seems to be "a thing."
    • Day 26 (6 Dec 25) - Another day of rainy weather - got in some mirror work rehearsing forward weight shift as finishing back swing. 
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* 🟨⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 no eagle -  but a birdie is a nice follow-up
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.