Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6379 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
How often do courses measure there green speeds. Also what speeds are normal, fast, or slow. What effects the speed besides weather?
In the bag
driver- G5
3wood-
5wood-
irons- cpr 4-pw[B]wedges[/B]- 52,56,60 cg12putter-odyssey:

Posted
I don't know when course measure speed, but I can lend a hand on what else effects speed.

One thing is if you are putting into the grain or with the grain, with it will be faster, and against it will be slower. Also when you go places that have mountains, a putt that rolls towards the highest peak will be faster then one going away from it.

Here's what I play:

Titleist 907 D2 10.5* UST ProForce V2 76-S | Titleist 906F4 18.5* Aldila VS Proto "By You" 80-S | Titleist 585H 21* Aldila VS Proto "By You" 80-S | Titleist ZB 4-PW TTDG S300 | Bob Vokey Spin Milled Oil Can 54.10 | Bob Vokey Spin Milled Oil Can 60.08 | Scotty Cameron Red X5 33" |


Posted
How often do courses measure there green speeds. Also what speeds are normal, fast, or slow. What effects the speed besides weather?

Everyone is different when it comes to how often green speeds are measured. I usually measure mine twice a week, or in the case of an upcoming tournament, everyday for the week prior.

In your second and third question, there are no set parameters for what slow, normal, or fast is. The single most defining element in regards to green speed are the contours of the green itself. Case in point, if all outside elements remaining equal, i.e., weather, mowing height and consistency, mechanical factors (topdressing, verticutting, rolling, etc.), and irrigation control, a flat green will play slower than a contoured green. Specific factors that affect green speeds include liquid fertilizers, verticutting, topdressing, lowering height of cut (which I don't), increased mowing frequency, increased rolling frequency, light daily hand watering as needed, and reduced or the elimination of night irrigation cycles are generally regarded as the main ways to increase green speeds. These are not something you do on a daily basis due to the diminished quality and vigor of putting surfaces, but rather in the short term before an event. I roll my greens two-three times per week, with one of those days without cutting, if only to maintain a smooth surface. My membership desires smooth greens over fast ones, so everybody's desires and expectations are different.

Driver: Cobra S2 9.5 Fubuki 73 Stiff | Wood: Titleist 909H 17 Aldila Voodoo Stiff | Irons: Titleist ZB 3-5, ZM 6-PW DG S300 | Wedges: Titleist Vokey SMTC 50.08, 54.11, 60.04 DG S200 | Putter: Scotty Cameron Fastback 1.5 33" | Ball: Titleist Pro V1x


Posted
Courses usually try to keep the speed of the greens consistent, unless it's a tournament and the bigger the tournament the faster the greens usually get.

Grain is a factor, as well as type of grass. Another hidden factor when it comes to weather is wind. If it's been dry and windy, even if the greens are not rock hard, it can feel like you're putting on glass.






3JACK

  • Administrator
Posted
How often do courses measure there green speeds. Also what speeds are normal, fast, or slow.

Most courses never, ever measure their green speeds.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Most courses never, ever measure their green speeds.

Do you know why they don't?

In the bag
driver- G5
3wood-
5wood-
irons- cpr 4-pw[B]wedges[/B]- 52,56,60 cg12putter-odyssey:

  • Administrator
Posted
Do you know why they don't?

I suspect they have no reason to. They know how low they can cut their greens to maintain "proper" speed, so they cut them at that height.

By "proper," I mean so they're easy to maintain (lower budget courses have slower greens because they require less care). Or some courses have greens with lots of slope, and if they were to cut them any lower, the slopes might get unfair. And I'm sure there are other reasons, too. To measure the speeds, too, courses would have to buy a stimpmeter, and then they'd have pressure to get to a "certain number." As one superintendent told me: "Better to have the members think the greens are at a 12 rather than tell them they're actually just a 10." What the golfers don't know won't hurt 'em - so measuring would be a bad idea in that situation. On that last one, my home course putts at about a 10-12 pretty consistently (12 on tournament days, 11 most every other day of the week, and 10 really early in the year or after a lot of rain), but the members think they've got course that regularly stimps at 13. I actually do own a stimpmeter and measure a few times, but never when anyone's around to notice, at the request of my superintendent, who happened to agree with the super I quoted above.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I suspect they have no reason to. They know how low they can cut their greens to maintain "proper" speed, so they cut them at that height.

Thanks makes sense.

In the bag
driver- G5
3wood-
5wood-
irons- cpr 4-pw[B]wedges[/B]- 52,56,60 cg12putter-odyssey:

Posted
Courses usually try to keep the speed of the greens consistent, unless it's a tournament and the bigger the tournament the faster the greens usually get.

Our green speeds unfortunately are pretty inconsistent (1 week fast like 11 - the next 9 and when a tournament is on Saturday you putt 9 on Friday and 11 on Saturday

) - BUT the bigger the tournament the faster the greens - true. IMO thats such a stupid way to show off and i dont get the logic behind that at all. Its like building potemkin villages for one special occasion and then just letting it slip. Just keep it at level - golf is hard enough esp. if your greens are heavily ondulated. Today a guy told me that last year all year long they had very slow greens at their course and when the club championship came up they made the greens lightning - so barely anybody could putt anymore.

Burner 9°
FW Burner 15°
Burner Rescue 19°
MP67 4-PW
CG10 50° CG12 DSG 54° & 60°


Posted
As one superintendent told me: "Better to have the members think the greens are at a 12 rather than tell them they're actually just a 10." What the golfers don't know won't hurt 'em -

I concur with that sentiment. This is one instance when an educated golfer could be a dangerous one...

Driver: Cobra S2 9.5 Fubuki 73 Stiff | Wood: Titleist 909H 17 Aldila Voodoo Stiff | Irons: Titleist ZB 3-5, ZM 6-PW DG S300 | Wedges: Titleist Vokey SMTC 50.08, 54.11, 60.04 DG S200 | Putter: Scotty Cameron Fastback 1.5 33" | Ball: Titleist Pro V1x


Posted
You can tell when they're fast by how fast they stop, If you hit a putt and when it slows down, it stops quick, theyre slow. IF they slow down, but very gradually stop, they're fast. That's my way of telling.

But speed of greens is all about what you think is fast and slow.


I like when my greens roll around a 12 on the Stimpmeter. And they were until the greenskeepers had to punch.
In The Bag

Titleist 905T 9.5°
Nike Sumo2 15°
Nike Sumo2 19°Nike Forged Irons - 3-PW Titleist Bob Vokey Spin Milled 56°10°Scotty Cameron Pro Platinum Newport 2

Note: This thread is 6379 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.