Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6352 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Well i had a thread before on how to figure out my handicap, well i got that, but now I don't exactly get how u use it and what those Handicap numbers on the scorecard for each hole mean, and how U use ur handicap during a round. It's been explained to me a little bit but not anything to what i understood, can someone help me out.

Its not always how you drive the ball, but how it arrives.


Posted
Well i had a thread before on how to figure out my handicap, well i got that, but now I don't exactly get how u use it and what those Handicap numbers on the scorecard for each hole mean, and how U use ur handicap during a round. It's been explained to me a little bit but not anything to what i understood, can someone help me out.

First off, you understand that the handicap system is all about giving or receiving strokes against other players to 'even' the playing field.

Ok...let's use some hypothetical numbers as you and a buddy are at your favorite course for a Match Play match. You have to know your Index. Let's say your Index is a 27.7 His Index is 16.3 At the scorers table (posting PC) there will be a "Course Handicap" chart based on the tees you are going to play. The tees are assigned a Slope rating. You decide to play from the regular 'white' tees that have a Slope rating of 121. The chart will tell you that your Course Handicap is 30 strokes. His will be 17 strokes. Subtract them. (30-17=13). You buddy will be giving you 13 strokes today. You get your scorecard and see that there are 'Handicaps' assigned to each hole. You'll want to keep track of which holes you get strokes on, so you place a little dot next to holes assigned "handicaps" of 1 through 13. These are the 13 "hardest" holes on the course and the ones you'll get an extra stroke. As get to #1, you see that the handicap is 16. You do not get a stroke. You play straight up against your buddy. You both bogey (halve the hole). #2 is assigned handicap 4. You get a stroke. You score a double bogey 6 for a 'net' 5. Your buddy scores a bogey 5. You halve the hole because you both had net 5's. This is how the handicap is applied to a match. Handicaps are applied differently in a Field tournament and even in a 'Skins Game' within your foursome. You would get 30 strokes. This means you get a stoke on all 18 holes plus an additional stroke on handicap holes 1 through 12. (18+12=30). Your competitors would do the same so your same buddy (17 course hcp) would get a stroke on handicap holes 1-17. You'll still wind up getting 13 more strokes than him. There are variations on this, such as getting a % of your handicap in a team tournament, but I believe this covers the basics for competitions. Now...if you're not playing against anyone except the golf course, you basically take your 30 strokes and match it against par. If your favorite course is a par 72, this means "your" personal par is actually 102 (72+30). Use this to gauge your progress and set goals. As your game develops and you improve, your Index/Course Handicaps should go down. Remember that your Course Handicap will differ based on the tees (Slope Rating) you play at various golf courses. Here's the link to the USGA Course Handicap chart . Hope this helps.

Driver: R7 SuperQuad TP 9.5° Fujikura Rombax 6X07
Hybrid: Rescue TP 19°

Orlimar3wood: Hip-Steel 15° (oldie but goodie)Irons: Ping i10 [4-GW] DG X-100Wedges: Ping Tour-W [54° & 58°] DG X-100Putter: i-Series Piper HBalls: B330-S or e5+


Posted
First off, you understand that the handicap system is all about giving or receiving strokes against other players to 'even' the playing field.

alright thanks, i understand it now but dont get one part, when u said that if my handicap is 27.7, then how did u figure out my course handicap? i dnt get that part

Its not always how you drive the ball, but how it arrives.


Posted
In my example, your "Index" is 27.7. Use the Course Handicap Calculation chart found at the course (or the USGA link I provided) to figure out your actual course handicap. There's a calculation, but the chart is easier.

IMO, people sometimes mis-use the word "handicap".

You need an Index to figure out your Course Handicap .

Driver: R7 SuperQuad TP 9.5° Fujikura Rombax 6X07
Hybrid: Rescue TP 19°

Orlimar3wood: Hip-Steel 15° (oldie but goodie)Irons: Ping i10 [4-GW] DG X-100Wedges: Ping Tour-W [54° & 58°] DG X-100Putter: i-Series Piper HBalls: B330-S or e5+


Posted
I can't find it, all it has is the calculator, it doesnt say how to do it though

Its not always how you drive the ball, but how it arrives.


Posted
Are you saying you can't find how to use the calculator?

1. In the USGA Handicap Index field, type in your Index (I assume you don't have one yet, so type in the 27.7 I used in the example).

2. In the USGA Slope Rating field type in the Slope of the tees you are playing from. This can be found on the scorecard. It's usually accompanied by the course rating. An example would be, from the 'whites' 68.2/121 (course rating/slope rating). Use the 121 in my example.

3. Press Calculate .

The program will tell you your Course Handicap.

(Again, you only need your Index and Slope of the tees you're playing from).

Driver: R7 SuperQuad TP 9.5° Fujikura Rombax 6X07
Hybrid: Rescue TP 19°

Orlimar3wood: Hip-Steel 15° (oldie but goodie)Irons: Ping i10 [4-GW] DG X-100Wedges: Ping Tour-W [54° & 58°] DG X-100Putter: i-Series Piper HBalls: B330-S or e5+


Posted
yes i know that but im saying how can I calculate it without using that (whats the formula) so i can do it whenever and wherever i want

Its not always how you drive the ball, but how it arrives.


Posted
Ok - Sorry about that.

(Index) x (Slope) / 113 = course handicap

27.7 x 121 = 29.66 (round to 30)

http://www.usga.org/playing/handicap...Ref_Manual.pdf

Driver: R7 SuperQuad TP 9.5° Fujikura Rombax 6X07
Hybrid: Rescue TP 19°

Orlimar3wood: Hip-Steel 15° (oldie but goodie)Irons: Ping i10 [4-GW] DG X-100Wedges: Ping Tour-W [54° & 58°] DG X-100Putter: i-Series Piper HBalls: B330-S or e5+


Note: This thread is 6352 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.