Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6333 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
my wrists supinate (i think thats what its called i have the ben hogan book) and my hands get behind the ball right at impact.

I'm looking forward to reviewing your video. It sounds like you're still not initiating the down swing just right, as your hands are releasing too early. This is a problem that a majority of golfers are guilty of, IMHO.

One of many drills that could help with feeling a pronating left wrist and bent back right wrist is swinging a driver that has a towel wrapped around the head.

Posted
swing video link

wow this is so annoying- just type in youtube.com in place of where the stars are and the video will come up

Tour Burner 9.5 w real Diamana 63 S
906f4 15.5 Proforce V2 S
909H 19 Diamana S
755 4-PW
Vokey 50/56/60Yes! NatalieBushnell Medalist w/ PinseekerI'll play just about any ball


Posted
wow you rock. thanks.

Tour Burner 9.5 w real Diamana 63 S
906f4 15.5 Proforce V2 S
909H 19 Diamana S
755 4-PW
Vokey 50/56/60Yes! NatalieBushnell Medalist w/ PinseekerI'll play just about any ball


Posted
I had the same prob posting a vid a little while back and I think the admin stepped in and fixed it...would like to figure it out myself. Any hoo, as I and others suspected, you are releasing way early. At waist high coming down you are fully released so at impact theclubhead is ahead of you hands resulting in high, weak shots.

One way to address this is to feel your left shoulder initiating change of direction rather than your hands. There are other issues however.

You are reverse pivoting, which in part accounts for the early release. In my view, the most important thing to work on is your right foot and knee. Pinch both knees toward each other at setup so the weight is on the insides of the feet, then make sure you keep the right knee flexed and kicked in a tad. This will likely feel restrictive at first, but that is a good restriction because you will be building torque. Just go back to where it is comfortable and swing back down with the shoulders from there...you will feel the right knee moving toward the target, and you should produce a much more powerful shot.

Posted
thanks. can you explain a little more about the reverse pivoting? i'm having a hard time getting my head around your explaination

Tour Burner 9.5 w real Diamana 63 S
906f4 15.5 Proforce V2 S
909H 19 Diamana S
755 4-PW
Vokey 50/56/60Yes! NatalieBushnell Medalist w/ PinseekerI'll play just about any ball


Posted
thanks. can you explain a little more about the reverse pivoting? i'm having a hard time getting my head around your explaination

My first attempt to upload a pic on this beard...hope it works.

This is the reverse position with the head and torso leaning toward the target.

Posted
If you can, imagine the right knee more flexed at this point which will cause the hips to level out and the spine, with your head, straightening, so your head is a bit behind the ball.

Posted
I had the same prob posting a vid a little while back and I think the admin stepped in and fixed it...would like to figure it out myself.

If you quote MPS67's post where he inlined the video, you can see how he did it. Basically, you just wrap the YouTube video code in [video][/video]tags.


Posted
My first attempt to upload a pic on this beard...hope it works.

It looks like this would leak a lot of the power in your swing. The shift of weight and tension in your torso is what produces the balance and power of your swing.


Posted

Not what you want


What you want


What you want

The reason you want the top position of 2nd & 3rd images is sou you can use the power and leverage of your right leg during the down swing. The golfer in the first image can only pivot around with the upper body. The golfers in images #2 and 3 can use both their legs and upper body.

The next thing to do is bump your hip towards the target a tad. Maybe two inches. Do this while keeping your head back where it was. This gives the down swing an impetuous or impulse to start forward. Then, pivot down and around like you've shown us. Maintain your spine angle until impact. I'd say that your turn after ball contact could be a little more shallow as you go around.

Below is a Shawn Clement video that covers the hip bump move that I mentioned above. Focus on the portion that starts 2:28 into the clip. Ignore the amount of hip rotation he utilizes in the back swing. IMHO, it's better to prevent the hips from turning back more than 45° so to maintain tension between the upper and lower bodies.


Posted
Just curious, how many of you use this reverse pivot?

I don't employ the reverse pivot as it can cause problems.

1) Loss of power because it takes away the use of your back leg in the downswing. Forces you to start down with the arms instead of the lower body. 2) Loss of accuracy because it shifts the spine to the wrong position. 3) Forces an out to in swing path. 4) Increase in lower back pain as that area is severely compressed during the downswing and pivot.

Posted

ok, yeah that makes perfect sense now mr wedge, thanks. i'm actually off to the range right now.... if only it was as easy to fix as saying the words....

you guys are all very helpful and thanks

oh man that video is golden. off to the range....

Tour Burner 9.5 w real Diamana 63 S
906f4 15.5 Proforce V2 S
909H 19 Diamana S
755 4-PW
Vokey 50/56/60Yes! NatalieBushnell Medalist w/ PinseekerI'll play just about any ball


Posted
3 buckets later, good improvement:

the first bucket messed everything up and felt weird of course

second one wasn't much better, but i started to understand and feel the weight shift thing better. i really kept my right knee bent and it felt much better.

the third bucket was the best. i kept trying to hold my hands from releasing early, and earlier and earlier and then all of a sudden it was right. the power was there, i was carving out perfect dollar bill sized divots, and the ball flight was nice. The feeling of compression is the best thing in golf. i was hitting a 56 sand wedge almost 100 yds.

I will keep working and maybe post an improvement video next week to see what else to work on. For now, my game is back on track to loosing strokes.

Tour Burner 9.5 w real Diamana 63 S
906f4 15.5 Proforce V2 S
909H 19 Diamana S
755 4-PW
Vokey 50/56/60Yes! NatalieBushnell Medalist w/ PinseekerI'll play just about any ball


Note: This thread is 6333 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.