Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6402 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I had feedback from a fellow player that my club's swing path (on the driver) hits the ball at is apex and then proceeds to curve back towards me. He recommends, instead, to extend the club head path beyond the ball along the target line. I use a one plane swing, if that makes any difference.

STR8 Dymo 10.5
Dymo 3W
Mid Rescue 3
MP-33 4-PW
Eidolon 52* GW LW, SW Titleist Bullseye Putter


Posted
Either way I try to extend out and through the ball.

If you can imagine looking straight down on a ball and seeing 4 quadrants I try to hit the quadrant that is closest to my right foot (as a right handed golfer) and push it out and away from me.

That is where my club head travels through at impact though of course when the arms can't extend any further the club head snap around.

So basically the club head is traveling down and out at impact.

Certified G.O.L.F. Machine Addict


Posted
Everything should be moving toward the target with full extension. I try to swing on one plane as well (I taught myself). My swing thought during my learning process was always extend toward the target. I am always target oriented.

My swing thoughts:

- Negative thinking hurts more than negative swinging.
- I let my swing balance me.
- Full extension back and through to the target. - I swing under not around my body. - My club must not twist in my swing. - Keep a soft left knee


Posted
There is a HUGE debate on the correct path following impact. I believe both are viable, but which is more efficient or effective remains for consideration.

You can:

A) Release down the line.

or...

B) Release low left.

Both options are completely ruined by slinging or flipping the clubhead. Cupping the left wrist destroys the impact alignments. Finally, the path of the club after impact should be a result of the pivot and arm-body motion, not a contrived result. Lateral, or halted body rotation, encourages dtl. Full rotational encourages low left.

Interestingly enough... the two greatest ball strikers used both methods. Ben Hogan released low left. Moe Norman released down the line.

Both however had flat left wrists at impact.

If you want to know more about how to release low left, check out slicefixer on golfwrx.

MiniMoe, it's neat to see someone doing well practicing the Moe Norman swing. I often wondered if Graves and his academy was full of it or not. Question answered.
Favorite Practice Course:
Z Boaz Municipal, Fort Worth <<< Ben Hogan grew up playing here!
--------------------------------------------------

In the bag: 983E 9.5*, Fuji Speeder S RPM LP, 4W, Neutral Bias STAFF Ci6 irons, S (going up for sale soon) Tom Watson PVD 08 Wedges (G.S,L)... and a 4...

Posted
kc8kir - Those guys did not teach me... I taught myself by watching Moe in person and asking questions and on Video. I have been to one of their golf schools. They are great teachers, but very technical.. too much so for me. I learned through feel and imagination. I am not exactly like Moe, but pretty close.... And loving every minute.

My swing thoughts:

- Negative thinking hurts more than negative swinging.
- I let my swing balance me.
- Full extension back and through to the target. - I swing under not around my body. - My club must not twist in my swing. - Keep a soft left knee


Posted
I thought you don't have to worry about club head path because the face will natually be closing without you doing anything, or whatever you try to do. Except of course you grip it tight and try to manipulate the club.
I believe that is the reason they make head offset from the shaft center. This is a dynamic behavior I learnt from other design experience.

Posted
I thought you don't have to worry about club head path because the face will natually be closing without you doing anything, or whatever you try to do.

Path matters a whole lot dude.

Imagine if you yank your club head way inside of your target line with a close club face......... dead pull left.

Certified G.O.L.F. Machine Addict


Posted
Path matters a whole lot dude.

Yes. I meant once you selected a path, no need to worry about how it closed. It will always be in a circular path. It is just a matter of long or short radius. However, if you snap the face closed or hold tight to leave it open relative to the path, you will have hook or slide.


Posted
Yes. I meant once you selected a path, no need to worry about how it closed. It will always be in a circular path. It is just a matter of long or short radius. However, if you snap the face closed or hold tight to leave it open relative to the path, you will have hook or slide.

Are you talking about how flat or how upright a circular swing is?

That makes a big difference as well. Its near impossible to lag enough and compress the ball enough with a severely flat swing.

Certified G.O.L.F. Machine Addict


Posted
Yes. I meant once you selected a path, no need to worry about how it closed. It will always be in a circular path. It is just a matter of long or short radius. However, if you snap the face closed or hold tight to leave it open relative to the path, you will have hook or slide.

That's what I thought you meant, and I agree. It's a mistake to try and manipulate the club in a certain way in or after contact, the clubhead path is a natural consequence of previous actions.

I'm working on lengthening my radius by asking Tiger's question, "how far can I get my right hand from my right shoulder at the top?". A wide arc on the right plane with proper wrist action goes a long way to ensuring a good follow-through.

Driver: Cobra 460SZ 9.0, med.
3 Wood: Taylor stiff
3-hybrid: Nike 18 deg stiff
4-hybrid:
Taylor RBZ 22 deg regular
Irons:5-9, Mizuno MP30, steel
Wedges: PW, 52, 56, 60 Mizuno MP30
Putter: Odyssey 2-ball


Posted
The hosel is at the heel instead of other places so that the head will follow a natually closing path relative to the CG without you doing anything. A club has it real CG hanging in the air much like a boomerang so that you can predict it's natural flight path once you set it in motion. That's why the more you try to manipulate with your hands, the less accurate you will get.

BTW, I am working on connecting my right elbow with right hip as a mean of steadying the turn center and allow me to grip lighter in the left hand (i am righty). I seems to have a more stable swing form and gained yardage. Will see how that goes.

Posted
He recommends, instead, to extend the club head path beyond the ball along the target line. I use a one plane swing, if that makes any difference.

I to have a one plane swing and i try

to go dead along my target line right after i make contact.

In My Hank Haney IJGA Bag
Driver: FT Tour 9.5 w/ Aldila Voodoo Stiff
3 Wood: i15 15.5 w/ avixcore red stiff
Hybrids: Rescue 09 19, 22 w/ fujikara fit on stiff
Irons: 4 & 5 MP-52, 6-PW MP-58 w/ KBS Tour Stiff Wedges: MP T-10 52*, 58* w/ KBS Tour StiifPutter: Fastback 1 34 inBall: : Pro...


Posted
I have a small book called "Golf Swing Master Key Explained". In it the author, Noel Thomas, is of the opinion that a proper on plane golf swing will always result in a slight draw. He explains the path thusly:

For a draw, the correct path for the center of the clubface is from inside
the target line to impact to outside the target line to back inside the target
line. This is commonly referred to simply as an inside-out swing. To get the
correct picture of this clubhead path in your mind, you must understand that
the center of the clubface does not come back inside quickly. Even if you
swing inside-out only a little, the center of your clubface must continue on
that path, taking the entire clubhead outside the target line, and extending
toward a point to the right of your target. How much that point is to the
right of your target, of course, depends on how much inside-out you swing.
Your clubhead should come back inside the target line only when you are
well into your follow through.


It makes sense. The plane is at an angle to the target line so to actually follow straight down the line is not possible unless you do some contortions with your body and arms. But I don't think this explanation really contradicts the idea of keeping the clubhead following down the line. "Following down the line" is just a thought to keep one from making some kind of sharp turn to the inside.

My Clubs
Nicklaus Progressive XC Irons: 3H,4H, 5-GW
Ray Cook SW & Gyro 1 Putter
Taylor Made Burner Driver 10.5
Taylor Made V-Steel 3 & 5 MetalsMy Home Course: Indian RiverMy Blog: Rant-o-Rama-Ding-Dong


Note: This thread is 6402 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • No one should measure a joint mobility away from that joint. If you go to physical therapy, they are not measuring your knee mobility based on your midline. It is based at the joint. Shoulder mobility should be measured in reference to the shoulder joint. 
    • He's using a driver swing, while I used the iron swing. Bryson goes from about 65° B to 15° B, hence the 50°. If you bend your right elbow, you're going to pull your hands across your chest some. Conversely, if you abduct your right arm and hold onto a grip with your left arm, you can see how extending the right elbow as we do in the golf swing during the downswing will "pull" the right shoulder/humerus forward (adducting it, as going from 65° to 15° of abduction is). Even people who pull their right shoulder WAY too far around them eventually get it "back in front" when their right arm/elbow extends. So, such a motion shows up as shoulder adduction even though the movement that causes it is just widening the trail elbow. The left hand on the grip almost "pulls" the hands forward as the left arm can't stretch much (there's some shoulder protraction, but that's almost maxed out at P4). Oh, I downloaded it and watched it (and commented there) before he blocked me. It's what led to him posting the comment in the "update" above. 😄  Single shoulder range of 75°, and that's going out well into the follow-through. 50° Max range up to impact. Manavian's video is bad. He keeps saying "midline" which is just a horrible way to look at it. He also kept saying that the club was moving that amount — also wrong. Adding left and right together is really freaking dumb. Another golf instructor said "That's like saying the player has 100 degrees of knee bend (adding left knee bend to right knee bend) 🤦‍♂️" (similar to what the biomechanist said about squatting). Also, see my post above about elbow bend. That's why Plummer’s alignment stick demo is so intellectually dishonest. A golfer can't get anywhere near that position on the left with his left hand on the alignment stick (quoted below).  
    • That makes no sense at all.  so, I watched that Instagram. Here is a summary...  Bryson.... Address: Trail Shoulder 0 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 65-deg abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 15-deg abduction. P9: 10 degrees adduction. Rory... Address: Trail Shoulder 16 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 26 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 0 degrees abduction.  P9: 18 degrees of adduction.  DJ... Address: Trail Shoulder 4 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 42 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 2 degrees abduction.  P9: 15 degrees of adduction.  Their point is that arm doesn't stay on the trail side. That the arms have to get across the chest from P4 to P9. I mean they do. What matters is the rate of which it happens relative to the position of the swing. The trail shoulder at P9 is not abducted a lot. The range of that total abduction movement is like 40 to 70 degrees. Bryson might be an outlier. Rory might be an outlier as well.  A couple of points.  1. None of them had any adduction at impact. So, this tells me the trail arms stays on the trail side of the body at impact. Is it moving towards lead shoulder, yes. It doesn't happen till post impact. The right side of the body is moving towards the target, so the arms don't have to as much as people think.  2. Trail shoulder adduction from Impact to P9 is 18 to 25 degrees.  3. P9 adduction of the trail shoulder is only about 2 to 12 degrees more adducted than at address. The arms/hands stay in front of the chest a long-time post impact. If Rory, from his address position just rotated his body towards the target and raised up his arms so he is at P9. He basically didn't have to move his trail arm further across his chest than where he started at address. Visualize that for a bit. I bet for people who tend to stall and drag their arms across their body to hit the ball, that would emphasize how much the arms stay in front of the body and how much you have to turn.             
    • Do you know how Manavian is measuring his shoulder adduction-abduction that purports to demonstrate 50 degrees or motion in Bryson's downswing? I know the broader biomechanics research/scientific literature on this suggests shoulder adduction-abduction is only a modest contributor of force generation in the downswing, so I'm definitely not convinced by anything he's arguing, I'm just curious how different people can be claiming to use ostensibly the same "data" to tell a much different story.
    • I have an update… I don't have much of a response, because the fact that they would ADD the numbers for the lead and trail shoulder together… I mean, wow. I was giving them too much credit. Nobody would think to assume they were doing THAT. That's beyond comical. One of the biomechanists I talked to put it this way: "So if I squatted down and went from 180 to 90 deg knee angle, then I would say 180 deg range of motion because I have two knees?" I'd type more (maybe), but honestly, I'm laughing a bit too hard. 🤣 Update: Mini Manavian blocked me on Instagram, so I cannot see his post showing Bryson with about 50° of range of motion (with a driver) from P4 to P7, and 75° only if you go out to the mid-follow-through. What a terrible loss for me. 😉 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.