Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Jack vs. Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?


Greatest Golfer (GOAT)  

222 members have voted

  1. 1. Tiger or Jack: Who's the greatest golfer?

    • Tiger Woods is the man
      1627
    • Jack Nicklaus is my favorite
      820


Recommended Posts

Posted
Jack's still the best, but Tiger will surpass him.

In my Grom:

HiBore XLS 10.5 / ProLaunch Blue
Ti Great Big Bertha Warbird 3 Wood
Killer Whale 5 WoodPinemeadow Command 3 Hy Eye 2 + 4-9 Irons 588 RTG 49 "Special", Gunmetal 56, RTG 60 White Hot #5 Tour B330-RXEpoch Tees Royal Oaks Golf Club


Posted
I did not get to see Jack in his prime, but I have seen Tiger hit shots that defy the imagination. His strenght is amazing.

Posted
It is always difficult to compare athletes in any sport across generations. There have just been too many advances in physical training, and technology (in golf, especially).

But on an even playing field, I have to give the title to Jack, for right now.

I love Tiger, and there is no doubt in my mind that he can eventually top Jack. But he still has to do it.
"There is no miracle tip. Fix your swing."

In the bag:
Sumo2 w/ Aldila VS Proto 60g S
Halo 2h Apex Pro 4-PW Vokey 2 52.08/56.10/60.04 Red X #3 34" Tour Deep

Posted
I wasn't old enough to see Jack in his prime or even past his prime but as Tiger will probably hold both the Majors wins record and tour wins record before he turns 40 while playing 10-15 events a year I'd have to side with Tiger

in my exterme sport bag :
Driver : SQ 460 9.5* Aldila NV65R
3 Wood: Ignite 15* graphite R shaft
2 Hybrid : 3DX DC 17*
3h-PW: Ignite with uniflex stock shaftWedges: Vokey 256.14 260.08Putters: Studio Style Newport 2 35", Red X-3 35" 350g, Solestamp Newport TeI3Balls: NXT Tour Shoes SP-8


Posted
To me, it's gotta be Jack.

I only remember seeing him on TV a bit when I was a kid and for some reason, he appealed to me.

Watching Tiger has never given me that feeling. Maybe cause I'm not a kid anymore....who knows.

Posted

It has to be Tiger. Golf is so much more accessible to the masses these days you have to wonder if there was anyone out there during Jack's era that just didn't have the opportunity to play.

Also, when Tiger is hitting on all cylinders there's not a player in history that could match him mentally and physically.

Let's be honest, Tiger is 31.. Has 13 majors and 61 tour wins. Unless he gets hit by a bus or is diagnosed with a career threatening illness (GOD FORBID!!) he's going to win at least one major every two years. Which means, we'll only have to ask this question for another 10 years

Don't get me wrong, Jack is a legendary golfer, but I have to give the nod to Tiger for greatest of all time.

In My Bag:

Driver: 9.5° FT-i LCG
3-wood: 15° X Tour
Hybrid: 18° FT HybridHybrid: 23° Baffler ProIrons: X-20 Tour 5-9Wedges: CG 12 Black Pearl 46/50/56/60Putter: 32" X3Ball: TP BlackHome Course: Blackmoor Golf Club (136/71.2)

Posted
I wasn't alive at jack's prime so I go with tiger being the greatest golfer, also tiger can rip it further, has a better short game, and he's a built athlete, what else is their to say?

I like both Tiger and Jack, however when Jack was in his prime the technology wasn't quite what it is now. The clubs, balls, etc are much better than when Jack was in his 20's and 30's. I'm not trying to downgrade what Tiger has accomplished because he is a great golfer, I'd just like to see what Jack could do using today's equipment or what Tiger could do with yesterday's equipment. Will call it a science experiment

Posted
I think Eldrick has a better overall game than Mr. Nicklaus, but Jack is by far a better sportsman than Tiger! Tiger is completely oblivious to the fans who pay good money to come watch him play (he is playing a game by the way, it's not exactly life or death).

Posted
i wasn't around to see jack dominate but it's hard to argue against tiger not just because of his ability but his way to think around the golf course. he has such an imagination and the athletic ability to pull of almost any shot.
what's in the bag

Driver: looking for a new one

3 wood: Hibore 15 degreeHybrid: Halo 2 ironIrons: 704 CB 3-PWWedges: CG 10 52, 56, 60Putter: White Hot XG Marxman MalletBall: Bridgestone Tour B330-S

Posted
I voted for Jack, based on the response options, but probably should qualify that choice. I'm not old enough to have watched Jack in his prime, but the '86 Masters is the dominant memory I have of watching televised golf as a kid, and I certainly remember the canonical status my dad, uncle, and grandfather seemed to grant to Jack, both as we watched that tournament and as they taught me how to play.

I love to watch Tiger play. I root for him when he's in contention, and I think he'd probably beat Jack regularly if they faced each other in their primes. But I think golf is particularly suited to measuring achievement in a summary sort of way. Comparing Jack's career to Tiger's is rather like comparing the 2004 Red Sox to the 2007 Red Sox (a pox on both their houses!). That '04 team was good and exciting, and they advanced to and won the World Series in remarkable and impressive fashion. The '07 team, an arguably more complete and talented group, looks poised to do that in a more impressive and dominant fashion, but they haven't done it yet.

So, maybe one could say that while Tiger might be the better player (longer, stronger, superior short game, more dominant relative to his competition, etc.), he's not yet the golfer Jack was/is. Whatever. This reply is too long for this topic, but one more thing. Anybody ever watch an older "Jack Nicklaus: Golf My Way" video? My dad bought it for me and my brother when we were kids, and I still get it out and watch it once a year or so. Still pretty good stuff.

Driver: FT-3 Tour 10.5, Grafalloy ProLaunch Blue 75-S
FW: Insight XTD Pro FP400F 14.5, Graphite Design Tour AD YSQ FW Stiff
Hybrids: G10 18 / 21, AWT Stiff
Irons: Steelhead X-14 PS 4-A, DG S300
Wedge: Vokey SM58.12Putter: 35" Studio Design 1.5Ball: B330, Z Star X or AD333, or D2 Feel...


Posted
I think Tiger and Jack are probably near each of in skill and ability. However, the physical conditioning program and eating habits of Tiger will enable him to exceed Jack's records and playing longivity.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • No one should measure a joint mobility away from that joint. If you go to physical therapy, they are not measuring your knee mobility based on your midline. It is based at the joint. Shoulder mobility should be measured in reference to the shoulder joint. 
    • He's using a driver swing, while I used the iron swing. Bryson goes from about 65° B to 15° B, hence the 50°. If you bend your right elbow, you're going to pull your hands across your chest some. Conversely, if you abduct your right arm and hold onto a grip with your left arm, you can see how extending the right elbow as we do in the golf swing during the downswing will "pull" the right shoulder/humerus forward (adducting it, as going from 65° to 15° of abduction is). Even people who pull their right shoulder WAY too far around them eventually get it "back in front" when their right arm/elbow extends. So, such a motion shows up as shoulder adduction even though the movement that causes it is just widening the trail elbow. The left hand on the grip almost "pulls" the hands forward as the left arm can't stretch much (there's some shoulder protraction, but that's almost maxed out at P4). Oh, I downloaded it and watched it (and commented there) before he blocked me. It's what led to him posting the comment in the "update" above. 😄  Single shoulder range of 75°, and that's going out well into the follow-through. 50° Max range up to impact. Manavian's video is bad. He keeps saying "midline" which is just a horrible way to look at it. He also kept saying that the club was moving that amount — also wrong. Adding left and right together is really freaking dumb. Another golf instructor said "That's like saying the player has 100 degrees of knee bend (adding left knee bend to right knee bend) 🤦‍♂️" (similar to what the biomechanist said about squatting). Also, see my post above about elbow bend. That's why Plummer’s alignment stick demo is so intellectually dishonest. A golfer can't get anywhere near that position on the left with his left hand on the alignment stick (quoted below).  
    • That makes no sense at all.  so, I watched that Instagram. Here is a summary...  Bryson.... Address: Trail Shoulder 0 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 65-deg abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 15-deg abduction. P9: 10 degrees adduction. Rory... Address: Trail Shoulder 16 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 26 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 0 degrees abduction.  P9: 18 degrees of adduction.  DJ... Address: Trail Shoulder 4 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 42 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 2 degrees abduction.  P9: 15 degrees of adduction.  Their point is that arm doesn't stay on the trail side. That the arms have to get across the chest from P4 to P9. I mean they do. What matters is the rate of which it happens relative to the position of the swing. The trail shoulder at P9 is not abducted a lot. The range of that total abduction movement is like 40 to 70 degrees. Bryson might be an outlier. Rory might be an outlier as well.  A couple of points.  1. None of them had any adduction at impact. So, this tells me the trail arms stays on the trail side of the body at impact. Is it moving towards lead shoulder, yes. It doesn't happen till post impact. The right side of the body is moving towards the target, so the arms don't have to as much as people think.  2. Trail shoulder adduction from Impact to P9 is 18 to 25 degrees.  3. P9 adduction of the trail shoulder is only about 2 to 12 degrees more adducted than at address. The arms/hands stay in front of the chest a long-time post impact. If Rory, from his address position just rotated his body towards the target and raised up his arms so he is at P9. He basically didn't have to move his trail arm further across his chest than where he started at address. Visualize that for a bit. I bet for people who tend to stall and drag their arms across their body to hit the ball, that would emphasize how much the arms stay in front of the body and how much you have to turn.             
    • Do you know how Manavian is measuring his shoulder adduction-abduction that purports to demonstrate 50 degrees or motion in Bryson's downswing? I know the broader biomechanics research/scientific literature on this suggests shoulder adduction-abduction is only a modest contributor of force generation in the downswing, so I'm definitely not convinced by anything he's arguing, I'm just curious how different people can be claiming to use ostensibly the same "data" to tell a much different story.
    • I have an update… I don't have much of a response, because the fact that they would ADD the numbers for the lead and trail shoulder together… I mean, wow. I was giving them too much credit. Nobody would think to assume they were doing THAT. That's beyond comical. One of the biomechanists I talked to put it this way: "So if I squatted down and went from 180 to 90 deg knee angle, then I would say 180 deg range of motion because I have two knees?" I'd type more (maybe), but honestly, I'm laughing a bit too hard. 🤣 Update: Mini Manavian blocked me on Instagram, so I cannot see his post showing Bryson with about 50° of range of motion (with a driver) from P4 to P7, and 75° only if you go out to the mid-follow-through. What a terrible loss for me. 😉 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.