Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6136 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Was looking at my Vokey's and was wondering when I needed to get new wedges. What visual gauge do you use to say it is time for new wedges? Do you look at the grooves and see the depth? Are the grooves flattening out? Is the finish gone?

Any thoughts

John

In the Sasquatch Tour bag:


3 Wood: 906f2, 13*, 906f2, 15*,
Hybrid : 19*Hybrid : CFT 21*, 24*Irons: APEX Edge iron 5-E, Apex 4 ShaftWedges : SV Tour 56*Putter: EFT BladeBall: Pro V1


Posted
I replace my wedges every 2-3 years which is about 150+ rounds or so... every 20 rounds I will touch up my grooves with my groove sharpener. After 150 rounds my wedges look worn out... they have plenty of nicks and dings, and the grooves are more shallow than when purchased.

I wouldn't necessarily buy new ones as soon as the finish wears off... for instance the Cleveland Black Pearls loose that black very quickly in the hitting area and the sole.
My Clubs: Callaway FT-i Tour LCG 9.5° w/ Matrix Ozik Xcon 6 stiff; Sonartec GS Tour 14° w/ Graphite Design Red Ice 70 stiff; Adams Idea Pro 2h(18°) & 3h(20°) w/ Aldila VS Proto 80 stiff; Adams Idea Pro Forged 4-PW w/ TT Black Gold stiff; Cleveland CG12 DSG RTG 52°-10° & 58°-10°; Odyssey...

Posted
I get appalled every time I hear this. Yeah, wedges will wear down but are they worn out? You would have to play them for years and years before you could tell a significant difference in their ability to bite the ball. I just sold my cast wedges from 1994 and I could still make them one hop and stop. The full shots still spun back. To me it's just another marketing tool to get you to buy more clubs. Maybe a little more practice will show most people they don't need to replace so often.


 


Posted
well, everyone places a pretty heavy focus on the grooves, but if your grooves are getting worn out, think about the face of the club. That face is probably being compressed into some slight kind of concave. I'd say replace your club when it's no longer as accurate or consistent as it used to be. For your short game, it'll make a huge difference. If you can still make the ball go where you want it, the club is fine.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
It depends. You could probably use them for years if youre a recreational player. I practice and play alot, so mine do get noticably worn and a rust spot will form in the hitting area in about a season of use. Ill replace them when the rust spot gets so bad i cannot wire brush it off anymore. I dont find this as much as a problem with the spin milled vokeys as i do the 200 series. Ive been using my SM 58 for nearly a year now and its still in great shape. Ive had to replace my 200 54 twice in the last year and a half. So i guess the model of club also has something to do with wear.
THE WEAPONS CACHE..

Titleist 909 D2 9.5 Degree Driver| Titleist 906f4 13.5 degree 3-Wood | Titleist 909 17 & 21 degree hybrid | Titleist AP2 irons
Titleist Vokey Wedges - 52 & 58 | Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 Putter | ProV1 Ball

Posted
You look at your answer every time you hit in to the green. Does the ball still stop like you expect/are used to? If so then your wedge is fine. Does the ball roll out much farther than it used too? If so then you need a new wedge.
In the bag:
905R 9.5° - UST ProForce V2 65R
909F2 15.5° Titleist Diamana 75
909H 19° Titleist Diamana 80
Zing 2 3-PW Vokey SM48.08 @ 51° Vokey SM56.11 Unitized Leo

Posted
If your fingernails are long enough, run one of them over the grooves of the wedge. If it makes a sound like a zipper being unzipped, the grooves are fine. If it doesn't, then they are starting to wear.

In my stand bag:
909D3 with 10.5 degrees of loft and a 45 inch Fujikura Rombax 6Z08, x-flex
909F3 15* with a stock Diamana Blue
FT 18* with an Aldila NV
X-forged ('07), 3-PW with Project X 6.0 CG12, 53/11, and 58* with DSG Red X2, 33"All with Lamkin Crossline Full Cord. (except the putter of...


Posted
If your fingernails are long enough, run one of them over the grooves of the wedge. If it makes a sound like a zipper being unzipped, the grooves are fine. If it doesn't, then they are starting to wear.

I have heard of this test for wedges before and use it myself. Not really sure what nails on the grooves really tell you, but it's some place to start.

|Callaway I-MIX FT-9  - Driver | Callaway Diablo Octane - 3 Wood | Callaway Diablo Edge Tour [3H & 4H] - Hybrids | Callaway X-forged 2009 - Irons | Callaway JAWS [52, 56, 60] - Wedges | SC Studio Style Newport 2 / Laguna 1.5 / Kombi-S - Putter |
 


Note: This thread is 6136 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 5/6* ⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛ ⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛ ⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛ 🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛ 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Now we’re getting all science-y.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.