Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6020 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I hope to purchase a golf GPS in the not too distant future. What should I be looking for and is there a website where I can learn more about them?

Posted
If you want the best of the best gps id go with any of the new sky caddies. You can check them out at...
http://www.skygolf.com/
Bag- Orig. 14 Stadium Tour
Driver- R7 limited 9.5*
3 Wood- R7
5 Wood-Viper Tour
Irons- X18/X22 ToursWedges- 52*/ 56* SandPutter- Hamilton f2 series BladeBall- Pro V1Glove-

Posted
There are several sites where you can compare them on the web (sorry, I do not know any off the top of my head). A few things to look for, though:

Initial cost - from Bushnell Neo ($149) to the Garmin Approach ($499).

Availability of course files for the courses in your area, especially those you play the most.

Cost for course GPS files - do you have to be a member of the website community to download and if so, how much is the membership and/or individual downloads? Additionally, are there any restrictions.

Ease of use and easy to understand information (such as easy to understand what the distances provided really are to).

Convenience of getting course files.

How are course files mapped? Most are mapped from satellite images and can sometimes be pretty inaccurate. I know SkyCaddie claims all of their courses were manually mapped on-course (and thus should be more accurate).

Size, weight, options available.


Personally I own the iGolf Neo (now known as Bushnell Neo since they bought the company). I really like it because of size, ease of use and after purchase costs (membership/course downloads is only $39/year), availability of local courses (I've only come across one out of about 70 that is not already mapped) as well as the initial cost. The issues I have relate to the courses sometimes not being mapped well (sometimes wrong holes mapped or wrong spots mapped as greens, etc.) The other issue is just a shortcoming of the Neo in that the distances to front-middle-back of green are static, meaning that no matter where I am in relation to those points they do not change whereas several other companies make these points 'static' so that it's a straight line from where you are at to the front-middle-back of green. I also wish they had more custom points mapped, but I can't complain about that considering my total ownership cost.
Driver: SQ DYMO STR8-Fit
4 Wood: SQ DYMO
2H (17*), 4H (23*) & 5H (26*): Fli-Hi CLK
Irons (5-6): MX-900; (7-PW): MP-60
Wedges (51/6*): MP-T Chrome; (56/13): MP-R ChromePutter: White Hot XG 2-Ball CSPreferred Ball: e5+/e7+/B330-RXGPS Unit: NEOPush Cart: 2.0

Posted
The SkyCaddie logo.

Seriously though, I swear by my SG5. Knowing exact yardage really helps. I would say it's worth a stroke or 2 per round at least.

909D3 9.5° w/ UST ProForce V2 (XS)
975F 14.5° w/ UST ProForce V2 (XS)
735CM 3-PW w/ True Temper Dynamic Gold (S300)
56° Spin Milled
60° Spin Milled Studio Style Newport 2 35" Pro V1x or Tour B330


Posted
#1 Tip.

Go to each vendor's website and see which has the most of the courses you play mapped.

Back when I was looking for a GPS, Golflogix had all the courses I play already mapped except one. I emailed them about the missing one and got a response the next day saying they mapped it. Thats when I bought a golflogix unit.

Now that I use an iPhone program my criteria are the same. ViewTI has added a local par3 within 40 minutes of my requesting it. I started playing the par3 course and I got an email response and was able to use the course on my iPhone before I hit the 8th hole.

Skycaddie mapping courses by hand is good, but if the courses you play aren't in there it does you no good.

Lately I've actually gone over to using my laser more. Most of the time if I can't see the hole I can't hit it. If I can laser the pin I don't need to really know if the pin is front back or center.

G10 9* Stiff Shaft Driver
R7 Draw 3 Wood
Burner 3 hybrid
26* Baffler Hybrid 5H Stiff Shaft.
Rapture 6-SW (3-5 are retired in favor of hybrids) Vokey Spin Milled 60* Wedge Newport 2 Pinseeker 1600 + ViewTI GPS software for iPhone


Posted
There are several sites where you can compare them on the web (sorry, I do not know any off the top of my head). A few things to look for, though:

All but SkyGolf use satellite imagery to map courses. I have talked with high level people who are responsible for course mapping utilizing satellite imagery and there is a highly sophisticated process that digitizes them and makes them pretty much as accurate as the SkyGolf products. After all, the SkyGolf adds show them using the same GPS equipment to map courses as they did when they first introduced their product many years ago. If the others weren't even close, nobody else would be in business! I have compared a SkyGolf side-by-side with a Golf Guru and the readings have been virtually the same.

In addition to what you said, some have a graphical depiction of the hole (Garmin Approach, Sonocaddie V300, Golf Guru 4), one has flyovers (uPro), some can keep stats and score, some only give you fixed front, center and back yardages to the green, some allow you to approximate the pin postion and give you those yardages "through the pin", some you can use to map a course (with the Golf Guru you can map up to 30 targets per hole and map the outline of the green for use with the Smart Green feature), some are touch screen, some are color, some are grayscale, one (Guru 4) is a multi-function device (MP3 player, picture viewer, Golf GPS and with additional software a navigational GPS). Customer service is another thing to consider.

Index 2.8
In the bag: Rapture V2 10.5, Ping G10 Hybrids (18/21/24), Ping i10s (5-PW), Ping Tour Wedges (52/56/60), Ping Anser, TM Burner ball, Golf Guru GPS


Note: This thread is 6020 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.