Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6145 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted
Allowing more discretion for officials (even with clear guidelines) does have its dangers, but IMO it's better than unnecessarily and unduly influencing the course of events in a tense battle between front runners in the last pairing by starting a totally gratuitous clock.

That's where we'll continue to disagree - I don't see it as "gratuitous." It's the rule, and the officials have a responsibility to enforce it equitably against every golfer in the field. Position in the tournament and/or world ranking doesn't/shouldn't matter.

Will you concede one point Erik .... that it would have been much better had the whistle been blown many holes earlier than the 16th?

They were warned earlier. They still hadn't sped up. Standard operating procedures and rules were followed. It was close from holes 6-16, but they weren't technically in breach until after they played 15. They were kept within range of the group in front by some bizarre rulings and things up ahead (JB Holmes on 16 backed up many holes), but when they hit 16, they were not only behind the time, but the entire hole was open. Remember both Paddy and Tiger had some lengthy par or birdie putts on those holes - they took longer to play those holes than they should have, particularly since they were already about 0.94 holes behind from holes 6 to 15.

Rules, like I've said, have lines. They were barely on the safe side of the line until 16. Then they weren't. Now, as a fan I really wish Paddy had played faster all day (and, Tiger too, but between the two Paddy's the slower player) so that they hadn't been warned. But as a golfer I think the rules were followed as they should be. I haven't heard anyone else - not a commentator, not a player, and not an official - say anything bad about how the ruling went. The only two who's really said anything was Tiger, and that's partly him trying to be a gracious winner, and Paddy, who has basically said "my fault" and moved on. Everyone else has said "it's a bummer, but the rules have to be enforced equitably." Furyk, Els, Cink, Chamblee, Nobilo, etc. Did it ruin things? Perhaps, yeah, we'll never know. But Paddy brought it on himself, and maybe he'll play a little faster now when he starts to fall behind. Maybe other players will as well. I do hope I'm done now. It's PGA week and I have a tournament of my own on Fri-Sun, which unfortunately will NOT have a slow play policy. Yawn.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 199
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
A valid argument for timing and such is that part of the game is planning and executing the shot in a certain time. You don't get a chance to keep debating what to do. It requires quick thinking and sound execution.

Maybe they need to really start enforcing pace and make it more of a factor. Put shot clocks on various parts of the hole.

It worked for basketball!

Note: This thread is 6145 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I mean there has to be some thought. For eg., something like 'soft knees and wrists' at set up and maybe a dynamic 'left arm to chin' as a trigger to start DS. I have these one or two anchor thoughts and have served me well. In fact, my wildest swings are the one where I have no thoughts or if I forget to walk thru my anchor thoughts. In contrast my best rounds are where I am consistent with the anchor thoughts.    OTOH, if I am running my entire half hour lesson (hypothetical) with some pro that I had last Saturday or whatever before every swing then I'm probably in trouble before I even get over the ball.      
    • Two bits. Bit 1 The NCAA's appeal of Brendan Sorsby being granted a temporary injunction will not be heard until February, so there will be nothing to prevent Sorsby from playing the full season and potential CFP.  Bit 2 The Big Ten Conference will hold a meeting and is expected to ban all of its athletic programs from playing Texas Tech in the regular season. Georgia has done the same. The SEC will meet to consider a similar ban. Fellow Big 12 members TCU and Kansas State are spearheading a similar ban, but the conference charter might not allow it. Meanwhile, Big 12 athletic directors are meeting this week to explore what options the conference might have.
    • No, but I'm also in disagreement that golfers have no thoughts over the golf ball, and/or don't ever think I've met someone I truly believe is thinking nothing but "target" or something on most shots.
    • StuM,  I have, in the past, added a left handed club. (Ususally a 7 iron) However, I usually take a stroke penalty and move the ball to where I want it.  I play for fun and in a pinch can use theback side if my club if I don't want the penalty stroke.    RetiredOldMan,  Terry 
    • So, Brendan Sorsby, Texas Tech transfer QB, was found guilty of sports betting by the NCAA. He admitted to it. He placed thousands of bets over multiple years while at Indiana and Cincinnati. This included betting on his own teams.  The NCAA rules ban athletes from betting on any sport (college or pro).  A retired visiting judge from Tarrant County, Texas has put an injunction on the NCAA ruling. He is a visiting judge because the first judge was a graduate and big fan of Texas Tech, and he recused himself. The judged ruled the following... "Under Curry's order, Sorsby is permitted to play for Texas Tech's 2026 season on the condition that he continues his treatment for a gambling and anxiety disorder and serves a two-game suspension (missing games against Abilene Christian and Oregon State)."  Don't get me wrong, I don't particularly care for the NCAA. That still doesn't mean that a college can choose when or where to say, "Yea we agree to these rules for all our sports, well except in this case." Here is a breakdown from S&W. The Hidden Weapon in Sorsby’s Injunction: How a Lubbock County Court Order Quietly Neutralized the NCAA’s Most Powerful Enforcement Tool - Law Offices of Snell & Wilmer By Ryan J. Regula On June 8, 2026, Lubbock County District Court Judge Ken Curry issued a temporary injunction in Brendan Sorsby v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, Cause No. DC-2026-CV-0791 (99th Judicial District... The main judgement made sense. Sorsby, I am going to have all this harm done to me if I don't get to play. The Judge, I agree. The penalty for gambling is too harsh, so here are all these things you must do, and I will grant this injunction against the NCAA. Basically, an analogy would be when a person goes into court for a DUI and they agree to all these other things to not end up in jail.  What sucks for the NCAA is the NCAA has appealed to Texas’ Seventh Court of Appeals, based in Amarillo. All four justices that preside over the court are graduates of Texas Tech University School of Law. It would be hilarious if all four of them had to recuse themselves 🤣. For those who like to read legal rulings...  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.