Jump to content
IGNORED

Taking clubs OUT of my bag.


shimm9
Note: This thread is 5313 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

But again, I get taking out, say, a wood or wedge that you don't hit well. No biggie, and I did it too. I DON'T get taking out a 6i and an 8i so you carry 5, 7, and 9i. The skill to hit an 8i is hardly different than that to hit a 7 or 9, and if you don't need the room in the bag for a different club, what's the benefit? Why do you want to take a 75% or 80% shot with a 7i to go 150, when an 8i would do it with a full swing?

You really don't get it.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


You really don't get it.

You're right, I don't.

Can we agree that the swing for a 6i through 9i aren't really that different from one another? If you can hit a 6i okay, you can probably hit a 7i, 8i, and 9i okay? And vice versa? So if we agree on that, we agree that one doesn't need to "master" any one of those clubs at the expense of the other, right? That a long time practicing on the 7i really doesn't affect practice on the 6i or 8i, you are mastering the same skill, right? So, if you use the same swing with each, why would you want to take one out of your bag unless you are making room for another type of club? Figure there's ~10yds between each iron, what are you gaining by taking a set that goes 140-150-160-170 (9-8-7-6i) and going to a 140-160 (9i-7i) set? I really don't get it. And I'm not being argumentative. I'm fairly new at this whole golf thing (playing 5 years now) so maybe there really IS a valid reason to play 2 of 4 irons, leaving the other 2 at home. But for the life of me, I don't understand it, and aside from some odd reason about playing 3/4 swings (couldn't you do that anyways, with all the irons in the bag?) no real reason has been given. So I'd be thrilled if you'd enlighten me.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
Can we agree that the swing for a 6i through 9i aren't really that different from one another? If you can hit a 6i okay, you can probably hit a 7i, 8i, and 9i okay? And vice versa?

Sean can correct me if I'm wrong, but that's really beside the point.

The point I think he's trying to make is similar to Seve practicing to hit balls out of a greenside bunker with a 4-iron. If you have only a 3W, 5I, 7I, and 9I, and a putter (for example) you're going to force yourself to hit different shots, even if it's just "swing a bit easier with the 7I" to fill the role of your 8I. Too many amateurs focus on making ONE swing when the best golfers can make SEVERAL types of swings. Removing clubs is often the easiest way to force the average golfer to make at least ONE different kind of swing (again, "softer"). On the other end of the spectrum, it can teach them to hit all sorts of different shots with all sorts of different swings.
So if we agree on that, we agree that one doesn't need to "master" any one of those clubs at the expense of the other, right? That a long time practicing on the 7i really doesn't affect practice on the 6i or 8i, you are mastering the same skill, right?

Yeah, you really missed the point. He's not disagreeing with that, I don't think - and you're proving my point that a lot of people think there's "one swing."

Golf clubs are tools. The better players can use a 7I to do a LOT of things, and those skills easily translate to an 8I, a 6I, and even a 4I. Even a driver. Again, by removing clubs, you force a player out of his "one swing" comfort zone." I had 132 yards, downhill, and into a little breeze yesterday on the 17th at Whispering Woods. The green slopes back left to front right. 132 is right between a 9I and a PW, even in those conditions (the wind would neutralize the downhill pretty evenly). I took a half swing and hit a low 7I that cut up into the wind and landed softly 12 feet from the cup. That was the only time I hit a shot with that "swing" that day, and I learned it by goofing around on the range and seeing what was possible with a 7I. How high could I hit it? How low? How short? How far? How much draw? etc.
So, if you use the same swing with each

If there was a way to play a "checkmark" sound every time you kept proving my point, I'd insert one here.

why would you want to take one out of your bag unless you are making room for another type of club? Figure there's ~10yds between each iron, what are you gaining by taking a set that goes 140-150-160-170 (9-8-7-6i) and going to a 140-160 (9i-7i) set?

To get better. To learn how to manipulate the tools you have at your disposal. There aren't ~10 yards between each club - there are only ~10 yards between each club with one particular swing. I can make full swings with my 5I and my 7I and hit the 7I 20 yards farther - and 10 degrees lower - if I want.

I really don't get it. And I'm not being argumentative. I'm fairly new at this whole golf thing (playing 5 years now) so maybe there really IS a valid reason to play 2 of 4 irons, leaving the other 2 at home. But for the life of me, I don't understand it, and aside from some odd reason about playing 3/4 swings (couldn't you do that anyways, with all the irons in the bag?) no real reason has been given.

Again, if all that removing some clubs results in is a guy taking 3/4 swings, that's still a win, because the guy - if he's paying attention - will probably notice that his 3/4 swings result in better contact and truer shots.

And yes, you could hit 3/4 shots with a full bag of clubs, but be honest: how many average golfers do you see gripping down on a 5I when they have a 6I yardage? Zero. They grab the 6I, flail away, and don't learn anything about themselves or their tools.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Can we agree that the swing for a 6i through 9i aren't really that different from one another? If you can hit a 6i okay, you can probably hit a 7i, 8i, and 9i okay? And vice versa?

At a couple points in every set of irons there are enough changes in shaft length, loft, lie angle, sweet spot location that subtle but fundamental changes in the setup and swing are required - like ball position, posture, more upright or shorter motion, etc. Typically it's from 7 to 8 iron and then again from the 5 to 4 iron, but it can be anwhere from 4 through 8 nowadays. That's one of the minor reasons why beginner sets only came with 3, 5, 7, and 9 irons. Sure keeping down the cost was the biggest factor, but taking out the even numbered irons removed some of the doubt about when these subtle swing changes needed to take place. With only the odd numbered irons you could make all the different types of shots you needed - not just full approach shots from out in the fairway. A beginner could make a long iron swing with the 3 and 5, a mid iron swing with the 7, and a true short iron swing with the 9.
. . .what are you gaining by taking a set that goes 140-150-160-170 (9-8-7-6i) and going to a 140-160 (9i-7i) set?

If you are being argumentative, I probably am as well. Just don't tell me what I agree to, and I won't tell you must drop irons from your set to be a better player. Let me just add the following to see if I can add some clarity to my opinion.

Let's look at it from a beginner's standpoint, event if they've been "beginning" for 40 years. The average 30 handicap player doesn't likely have their irons swing grooved to the point where they can even realize the advantages of a 10 yard distance gap versus a 20 yard distance gap. At least not from what I've seen on the course. Most high hdcappers I've seen would be better off - if they feel the need to carry a full set of 14 clubs - carrying 2 putters (a mallet for short putts and a blade for lag putts), an extra hybrid or fairway wood for driving on long par 3s or tight par 4s, and a couple extra wedges with varying bouce and sole characteristics for varying turf and forget about narrowing the gaps from 140 to 160 to 180. From the viewpint of a better irons player (regardless of handicap), A 20 yard gap is approximately 2 clubs (20 paces, 60 feet). There would be less waffling between clubs on the tee and play may even speed up. It's not really that hard to back off a 170 yard club (7-iron) and hit it 155. It's also not that hard to walk on a smooth 140 yard club (9 iron) and get an extra 10 to 15 yards out of it. Good players do this all the time - vary their swing to hit ball the distance and trajectory they want with a variety of irons - it's good practice for playing in the wind, when laying up, when playing safe over hazards, when hitting out of a hazard or out of the trees. Playing with fewer clubs is good practice in general, and as it tends to lower expectations it can actually decrease scores. Either way, anything you can do that excercises your creativity as well as your muscles is a good thing.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 5313 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I kind of figured that might be part of the problem. I’m still guilty of it myself at times and you’re a better ballstriker than I am. I imagine the temptation to go for the flag grows as you get more control over your wedges. Might want to think about shot selection, too. I don’t know how you typically play short game shots but I see a lot of people default to hitting high pitch shots from basically everywhere, to every hole location, without regard for how the green is contoured and how the ball might release depending on where it lands. I know my short game has been steadily improving from expanding my shot selection, overall. Though to be honest, part of that is from necessity because I was really struggling with pitch shots so I started hitting more chips from everywhere, but it taught me a lot more about how to play short game shots in general. NP man. We’re all learning and improving together. It is a really good tool.
    • 2 rounds this weekend, one at my home course and another course that I know well.   Played well for 3 of the 4 nines.    Ended up with an 80 and an 88.  Breaking it down by 9, it was 38, 42, 41, and a tough 47 where I somehow ended up with chipping/pitching shanks where I dropped at least 6 strokes on the last 6 holes.
    • Yikes, how time flies. Here we are, almost ten years later. After prioritizing family life and other things for a long time, I'm finally ready to play more golf. Grip: I came across some topics on grip and think my grip has been a bit too palmy, especially the left hand. I'm trying to get it more in the fingers and less diagonal. Setup: After a few weeks of playing, this realization came today after watching one of Erik's Covid videos. I've been standing too far from the ball, and that messes up so much. Moved closer on a short practice session and six holes today, and it felt great. It also felt familiar, so I've been there before. I went from chunking the bejesus out the wedges to much better contact. I love changes that involves no moving parts. Just a small correction on the setup and I'm hitting it better and is better suited for working on changes. I'm a few years late, but the Covid series has been very useful to get small details sorted. I've also had to revise ball position. The goal now is back of ball in the middle of the stance as the farthest back with wedges, and progressively moving forward the longer the clubs get. Haven't hit the driver yet, but inside left foot or at the toe I suppose. Full swing: It's not terrible. I noticed my hands were too low, so got that to work on. Weight forward. More of the same stuff from earlier days. Swing path is now out-in and I want the push-draw back. When I get some videos it'll be easier to tell. I've also had this idea that my tempo or flow/rhythm could improve. It's always felt rushed around the end of the backswing into the transition, where things don't line up as they should. A short pause as things settle before starting the downswing. Some lessons might be in order. Chipping and pitching: A 12-hole round this week demonstrated a severe need to practice, but also to figure out what the heck I’m trying to do. I stood over the ball with no idea of what I wanted to achieve. On a four meter chip! I was trying the locked wrists technique, which did not work at all. As usual when I need information, I look for something Erik has posted. I’ve seen the Quickie Pitching Video before, but if I got it back then, I’ve forgotten. After reviewing that topic, some other topic about chipping and most importantly, the videos on chip/pitch from his Covid series, I felt like I understood the concept. I love the idea of separating those two by what you are trying to achieve, not by distance or ball flight. With one method you use the leading edge to hit the ball first. With the other, you use the sole to slide it under the ball. I was surprised he said that he went for the pitch 90% of the time while playing. I’ve always been scared of that shot and been thinking I have to hit the ball first. Trying to slide the club under usually ended with a chunked or skulled shot. After practicing in the yard the last days I get it, and see why the pitching motion is more forgiving. It’s astounding how easy the concept and motion is. Kudos to Erik, David and anyone else involved for being an excellent students of the game and teachers. With those two videos, my short game improved leaps and bounds, without even practicing. Just getting the setup right and knowing what motions you are trying to do is a big part of improving. Soft hands and floaty swings feels so much better than a rigid “hinge and hold”, trying to fight gravity and momentum by squeezing the life out of the grip. At least how I took to understand the “hold” part. I also think the chipping motion will help in the full swing. Keeping pressure on the trigger finger to ensure the hands are leading the clubhead and not throwing it at the ball. I've also tried looking in front of the ball at times when chipping, which helps. That's something I've been doing on full swings for a long time, and can make a big difference on the ball flight. Question @iacas: You say in the videos that you want the ball somewhere near the middle of your stance, and that for pitching it's the same. On the videos you got a fairly narrow stance, where inside of the left foot is almost middle of the stance, but the ball looks more inside the left foot than middle of the stance. Is that caused by the filming angle or is the ball more towards the inside of the foot? I often hit chips and pitches from uphill and downhill lies, where a narrow stance would have me fall over. What is your thought process and setup for those shots? The lowpoint follows the upper body, around left armpit IIRC, so a ball position relative to the feet may not be in the same spot relative to the upper body with a wider stance. Practice: I've set up my nets at an indoors location where I can practice at home. I did a quick search on launch monitors (LM), but haven't decided on anything yet. We're probably buying a house in this area in the near future, so I may hold off a purchase until I see what I can get going there. At some point I'd love to get a proper setup with a LM that can be used as a simulator. Outdoors golf is not an option 4-6 months a year here, so having an indoors option would be great. That would also be a place to use the longer clubs. My nearest course is a shorter six hole course where I don't use anything longer than a 21º utility iron. To play longer 18 hole courses I have to drive 1-1.5 hours each way, which I will do now and then, but not regularly. The LM market has changed a lot since Trackman arrived, and more people are buying them for personal use, but it's still need to spend a lot of money for a decent one that can fi. track club path. The Mevo at £305 could perhaps be something to consider. Maybe they have lowered the price to get out units before a new model is launched? It is almost six years old, though perhaps modified since then. It's got limited data and obviously isn't an option as a simulator, but could provide some data when hitting into a net. I'd have to read more about it first. It has to be good enough to be useful for indoors practice. As long as I frequently hit balls on the range or course, I'll get feedback on any changes there.
    • I'm pretty good at picking targets with mid/long irons in hand, but yes lately I have been getting more aggressive than I should be, especially from 100-150. The 50-100 deficiency is mainly distance control, working on that mechanically with Evolvr, but the 100-150 is definitely a result of poor targets.  6,7,8 iron in my hand I have no problem aiming away from trouble/the flag, hitting a very committed shot to my target, but give me PW, GW, and some reason I think I need to go right at it (even though I know I shouldn't). Like here from my last round. 175 left on a short par 5 to a back right flag. Water short right and bunker long. Perfectly fine lie in sparse rough, between the jumper and downwind playing for about 10yds of help. I knew to not aim at the flag here, aimed 40 feet left of it, hit my 165 shot exactly where I was looking, easy 2 putt birdie.   But then there's this one. I had 120 left from the fairway to a semi-tucked front left flag. Not a ton of trouble around the green but the left and back rough does fall off steeper than short/right rough. For some reason I aimed right at this flag with my 120yd shot, hit it the exact proper distance but pulled it 5yds left and had a tough short sided chip. Did all I could to chip it to 8 feet and missed the putt for a bad bogey. Had I aimed directly at the middle of the green maybe 5yds right of the flag, a perfectly straight shot leaves me 20 feet tops for birdie and that same pulled shot that I hit would have left me very close to the hole.    So yeah I think the 50-100 is distance control and the 100-150 is absolutely picking better targets. I have good feels and am strong with distance control on those I just need to allow for a bigger dispersion.    This view is helpful. For the Under 25yds my proximity is almost double from the rough vs the fairway which reinforces that biggest weakness right now being inside 25yds from the rough. But then interestingly enough in the 25-50yds I'm almost equal proximity from fairway and rough, so it looks like I need to work on under 25yds from the rough and then 25-50 from the fairway. The bunker categories are only 1 attempt each so not worried about those.   Thanks as always for the insight, it's been helpful. I'm really liking ShotScope so far.
    • Wordle 1,053 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 🟨🟨⬜🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...