Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Range Ball Distance Vs Normal Course Balls


Note: This thread is 7087 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Hi everyone,

Seems like a great golf place here.

I have started to go to the range and hit some golf balls and I wanted to know if there is a distance difference between the range balls and normal golf balls.

My though here is that a range ball is suppose to be cheap, and some type of limited flight since most driving ranges are about 250-300 yards.

So if someone could hit a range ball 200 yards on a perfect day, do you think that the same exact swing on a normal ball would travel the same or farther.

Posted
So if someone could hit a range ball 200 yards on a perfect day, do you think that the same exact swing on a normal ball would travel the same or farther.

welcome to the forum neighbor

Depending on the range - some have very short hitting area and using very special balls, that might have as little as 50% of distance (I've experienced it in El Segundo in Los Angeles early this year), but I'd think on average you should think "normal" ball will add about 10 - 20yds with irons and up to 50yds with woods/driver... At the range I'm going to there is a 250 fence at the end of it. With range ball even flushed - I hit it on one hop. When I take old, beaten up "normal" ball - with solid hit I'm on the second layer of fence on the fly...
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I think a normal dropoff would be around 15%.

I consider myself lucky to be close to a decent range with good golf balls. I've actually hit some of my older Pro-V1x's after a bucket just to see the difference and it really wasn't too much. With my driver it might have been only 5, maybe 10 yards.

Fairways and Greens.

Dave
 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Thanks guys, I thought there had to be a reason for a so called "Range Ball" and to be honest, the one of us that practice with at a range, might over shoot on the course since we'd be playing longer clubs then needed.

I do think there is some difference BUT with long irons and a driver where ball dimps and compression would play a big part of the ball flight and a range would prefer to keep those balls "In play"

NCGolfer - also when you said you hit old beaten up balls wouldn't they fly less then the new balls you would play on a course so the fact that they actually went a little farther even though they where old and beaten up show that there is a bit of a difference?

Posted
Range balls are usually the worst constructed balls and they are beat to hell before they are replaced. I usually carry a "real ball" with mid-irons about 5-8 yards farther than the range balls.

Another thing you have to do is check the yardages to markers with a range finder. This is really important with shorter distances because the "dead" range balls will give you pretty accurate carry with lofted wedges.

Other golfers at my regular range are shocked when I tell them the 175 marker is actually only 155. And they are a little deflated to find the 230 sign is actually 205. The center green flag was marked 125, but it was really only 115-120 depending on where you were hitting from. I notice lately they are taking the yardage markers off the sticks.

Every time I go to any range I check the key markers with my finder.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

ok after visiting a few local ranges I now know what is going on with the range balls vs normal balls.

My local range has a net wall about 200-225 yards away, and unless you make solid contact will you come close to touching the wall....

Reason, pratice balls... or limited flight balls at this range. (found out they use to have a sign banning drivers)

I've been to two other longer ranges with fences of about 250 at one and 300 at another.

those to places use super range balls which fly better then the limited flight balls.

I did notice that at either places the short irons are almost the same distance.... within 5-10 yards

but when the big clubs come out of the bag the ball really does matter.

at the 250 yard range i had the pleasure of finding two normal balls in the basket.... I am assuming a fellow golfer who wanted to test out the balls left them behind. Needless to say, for now those balls are lost in the woods at the 250 yard range. I did happen to hit a super range ball that hit a tree solid so those type of pratice balls do fly well (same 250 yard location).

Summary:
Balls market with practice my be limited flight balls. and balls market as super range balls are very close to normal golf balls, but they are still a range ball and even though i didn't get to hit a normal ball at the 300 yard range, i did have a few balls roll up a hill towards the 300 mark.

Club used was R580 XD 9.5 stiff.

Disclaimer: I don't have a range finder and even though the distances where laser marked at the ranges I couldn't verify it. Besides anyone can be a range superstar right


Note: This thread is 7087 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.