Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5891 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I'm thinking of buying a second hand Taylomade r7 driver, and I'm pretty sold on the Fujikura 757 shaft for it. I right now have a TM 580 with an AJTech Z43 shaft in a 9.5 degree, btw that shaft has a torque of 2.9. So my question is, since a lower torque means lower trejetory, should I go with a 10.5 degree or will another 9.5 be OK? Oh my AJ is in between Regular and Stiff, and I'd get a Stiff Fujikura. I have a club head speed of about 105 ish. I can hit the 580 alright, I think the stiffness it getting a little too weak for me, hence the thoughts of a new club and shaft. So first is my head/shaft a good combo? And a 9.5 or 10.5? And if anyone has an r7 for sale, let me know! Thanks

Posted
I had a cleveland launcher when they first came out and it had the fujikara shaft in it. I seemed to be hitting it well but just didn't seem to be getting the distance i wanted. I went to Golf Galaxy and tested some diffferent shafts in the simulator. I was really impressed with the adjustments that they could make just by using a shaft with different flex points. I was able to change the trajectory on my drives and gain some very valuable information. I realize that this doesn't really answer your question but I would definately try one in a simulator if I was to buy one again.

Posted
I agree, you should try one in a simulator. I had an old r5 dual with a 757 and loved it, but it's not for everybody. That being said, I swung about 105 mph at the time and bombed it, and that driver was great. It hits the ball pretty low, but if you're swinging 105 mph, you probably have no problem getting the ball in the air, and I'd stick with the 9.5 degree. But that's just my $.02.

What's in my Sun Mountain C-130 bag:

Driver - Taylormade Superfast 2.0 TP 10.5
3 Wood - Taylormade Burner 15* REAX
Hybrid - Adams Idea Pro 18* GD YSQ-HL

Irons - Callaway X-18 4-PW

GW - Cleveland 588 51*

SW - Cleveland CG 12 56*

LW - Cleveland CG15 60*

Putter - Cameron Studio Style Newport 2

Bushnell Medalist rangefinder


Posted
I dont mean to confuse the matter but a lower torque shaft does not necessarily mean a lower ball flight. Shaft torque is something that should be matched with your club head speed not desired ball flight. If your club head speed is 105 mph I would definitely suggest a low torque shaft maybe not that low but I dont think you'll have a problem with it. It general the slower the swing speed the more torque you want to allow, If a low swing speed player plays with a shaft that has too much torque he'll tend to hit alot of shots right, where as a high torque shaft for a person with higher swing speeds (like when I tried the stock shaft on the Cobra ZL its like a 4.8) will tend to pull shots left.
Whats more important to ball flight is kick-point, if you want a lower ball flight you want a higher kick point, higher ball flight-lower kick point.
For the head its tough to tell you want the combo that gives you that perfect 3600 rpm 12-15* flight so without actually testing its a shot in the dark...
Boom Stick: 907 D2 w/accuflex The juice
3 wood: 909F2 w/Fujikura Motore F1 55
Hybrid: 909H 19* w/Fujikura Motore F1 80HB
Irons: 2010 AP2 (3-PW) w/Dynamic Gold S300
Wedges: Spinmilled 54*, 60*Putter: 2002 Studio Design 1.5Balls: Pro V1Range Finder: Pro 1600Proud Member of Piranhas Golf Team Ecole de...

Posted
It general the slower the swing speed the more torque you want to allow, If a low swing speed player plays with a shaft that has too much torque he'll tend to hit alot of shots right, where as a high torque shaft for a person with higher swing speeds (like when I tried the stock shaft on the Cobra ZL its like a 4.8) will tend to pull shots left.

Still, the effects are minimal. 4.8° is not nearly enough really cause heinous pull-hooks; let along be noticeable. In fact, the torque doesn't really have a predetermined effect on the ball. From what I've heard, hitting a shaft with too much torque on the toe, for example, will cause more hook than hitting a low torque shaft on the toe because the gear effect will be higher. The real thing about torque is trying to find the one that fits you, so you can be the most consistent.


Note: This thread is 5891 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 254 5-4 Arms off chest in backswing and downswing. Short swing, pause and then hit.  Hit foam balls. Keeping arching of wrist a focus as well. 
    • I would think of it in terms of time. The time it takes to get the arm angle into a good position to deliver the club with proper shaft lean. Another component is rotation, but that is also a matter of timing. It relates to how the body stalls to give the golfer time to hit the ball. If you have to get 80+ degrees out of that right elbow in one third of a second versus 50 degrees in the same time then you have to steal time from somewhere. It is usually body rotation. That does not help with shaft lean.  I agree in that amateurs tend to make the swing more complicated than pro golfers. 
    • I haven't been able to practice like I wanted and won't for the next week.  1. The weather sucks in Ohio this year. I have been mostly inside hitting foam balls. Just kind of my basic stuff.  2. I woke up last Saturday with a left side rib muscle on fire. If I turned or leaned a certain way it would spasm that almost buckled my knees. I have been taking a break to let that settle. I don't want to get a long term injury. I think I pinched a nerve or just aggravated a muscles.   3. I am going on a mini-vacation to Florida (screw you Ohio weather) with a friend, and rolling that into a work conference I have next week. I will be with out my clubs for a week.  I will be back next in two Fridays to hit the ground running with some warmer temps and better weather in Ohio, hopefully. I would really like to get more out on the course and the range.     
    • Day 580 - 2026-05-04 Played eight holes. Sometimes golf kicks you in the nuts. 😉 
    • I work with a lot of golfers who want more shaft lean at impact, who currently have AoAs that range from +2° to -2°, and who love to see the handle lower and more "in front of their trail thigh" from face-on at P6. And a lot of these golfers try to solve the issue by working on the downswing. They do something to drag the handle forward. Or they just leave their right thigh farther back so the same handle location "looks" farther forward. Or they move the ball back in their stance. Or they push themselves down into the ground to get the handle lower and increase (decrease?) their AoA (to be more negative). The real fix is often to get wider in the backswing. To do LESS in the backswing. To hinge less, fold the trail arm less, abduct the trail arm less. I had a case of this over the weekend. Before, the player had 110° of trail elbow bend, "lifted" his trail humerus only a few degrees, etc. The club traveled quite a bit around him, and he tended to "pick" the ball from the fairways. In the "after" swings below (which are mild exaggerations — this golfer does not need to end up at < 70° of elbow bend. These were slower backswings with "hit it as hard as you normally would" intent downswings), you can see that he bent his elbow about 70° instead of 110° and lifted his right arm an extra ~15° or more. You can't see how much less this moved his hands across his chest (right arm abduction), but it was also decreased. His hands stayed more "in front of" his right shoulder rather than traveling "beside" them so much. The two swings look like this: The change at P6, without talking about the downswing one little bit (outside of him telling me that he tends to pick the ball), is remarkable: Without 110° of elbow bend to get out (which he gets to 80°, a loss of 30°), the golfer actually loses slightly less elbow bend (70 - 50 = 20), but delivers 30° less elbow bend, lowering the handle and letting the elbow get "in front of" the rib cage… because it never got "behind" or "beside" the rib cage. If you look at this video showing the before/afters of P6, you'll note the handle location (both vertically and horizontally) and the shoulders (the ball is in the same place in these frames). This golfer's path was largely unaffected (still pretty straight into the ball, < 3° path and often < 1.5°), but his AoA jumped to -5° ± 2°. I've always said, and in talking with other instructors they agree and feel similarly, that we spend a lot of time working on the backswing. This is another example of why.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.