Jump to content
IGNORED

Adidas Tour 360 LTD or 4.0?


Note: This thread is 5160 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Like the fit and feel of both, looks maybe a slight advantage to the 4.0s. I can pick up the LTDs for $129, while the 4.0s are still full retail ($179) almost everywhere. Any compelling reasons to go with the 4.0s?

-C

ITB:
905R Proforce V2
SS03 Fujikura Tour Platform
MD 21 Irod
MD 25 Fujikura Tour PlatformKZG Forged Blades 5-PW Rifle 5.5 Vokey SM 54/08, 60/04 Rifle Spinner Kombi 35"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Mate take a look at this post.

http://thesandtrap.com/forum/threads...s-Tour-360-3.0

I did a mini review of these and some good reply's, I think the main advantage of the 4.0 is that they sit lower (getting you closer to the ground for stability) and they are lighter.
The 360 3.0 (not the ltd) shown in my thread can be picked up cheap :)

:tmade: M2 10.5° - Fujikura Pro 60 - Stiff
:tmade: V-Steel 18° - M.A.S Ultralight- Stiff
:ping: G400 4-UW - AWT 2.0 - Stiff
:tmade: Tour Preferred 58° ATV - KBS Tour-V - Wedge
:scotty_cameron: Select SquareBack - 34" - SuperStroke MS 2.0

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I've got the 3.0s and they are the best shoes I've ever worn. I've got thin feet and they even beat out my custom FJ Classics. Haven't tried the 4.0s. Hope they fit just as nice. If not, I've got to pick up a couple more 3.0s.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I've got the 3.0's & LTD's, and prefer them to the newer 4.0's. The 4.0's are very comfortable and lightweight but I just can't get over the toe box on them. The stitching is weird and it looks like the shoe is on crooked or something, if you try on a pair you'll quickly see. If it doesn't bother you, more power to you because otherwise it's a great looking shoe.

I needed a slight break in period with the LTD's but once broken in they are very comfortable. The 3.0's are a little stiffer but I think looks wise I like them the best of the bunch, plus I got them for like $89 on closeout a few months ago.

I don't really think you can go wrong, I think Adidas golf shoes are the best on the market and I've tried just about every other brand out there.

Driver: 910D3 - Oban Kiyoshi 75 X / 909D3 - Oban Devotion 7 X
3 Wood: R9 TP - Oban Devotion 8 05
Hybrid: 909H - Project X Graphite
Irons: 4-6 AP2 - Project X 6.5 / 7-W MB - Project X 6.5
Wedges: Scratch 1018 52/56/60 KBS Tour XPutter: SC Button Back Newport 34" / SC Del Mar 34" / SC SS Newport...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I dont think you can go wrong either. I have two pairs of LTD's and I dont have any complaints. I would guess that the 4.0's are just as good.
THE WEAPONS CACHE..

Titleist 909 D2 9.5 Degree Driver| Titleist 906f4 13.5 degree 3-Wood | Titleist 909 17 & 21 degree hybrid | Titleist AP2 irons
Titleist Vokey Wedges - 52 & 58 | Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 Putter | ProV1 Ball
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 2 weeks later...
I just ordered a pair of 4.0's for $95 through a golf team discount. I cant wait for them to come in.

Dymo
R5 5 Wood
Highbore 2 Hybrid
R7 Irons 3-SW
60° Lob58° CG12 White Hot #5 Nxt Tour App for BB Tour

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 5160 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,068 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟩 🟨🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Hmm... didn't know that. Good to know. 
    • Yes, please, because if you said it was 20" but should be 10", that's a 10" error, but if it was 2" and 1", that's a one-inch error. Which is why… there is a different process for shorter putts (inside of about 6-8'). You don't really use your fingers anymore there. I misspoke when I said that you use the low edge of the hole. That's the old way. In reality, you don't use your fingers at all inside of whatever your crossover point is. That's not what he was doing there, no. He was just trying to see the slopes and tilts, not actually measuring distances and holding up fingers. His fingers were on the green. :D
    • This is the concept I wanted to be noticed. I can recheck the numbers to make them more accurate.  The closer you get to the hole, the more the height of the player affect the reading of the putt and the system starts to diverge from reality. Aiming to the low part of the hole in short putts is a way to patch the method so that it gets closer to reality. Only using it at ball heigth, as camilo villegas used to read lines, is going to give you the exact distance away from the hole to aim at.   
    • I stepped off 10' from a wall electrical outlet this morning when I read it and held up two AimPoint fingers at about stimp 10… and got a little over 8" (because I was 10' and not 9').
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...