Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 7078 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Will Tiger get better?

    • Yes
      10
    • No
      1


Recommended Posts

Posted
This guy is just freaking me out at the moment. I just wanted to know whether other people believe think he can actually 'ascend' to another level.

Thanks,
Binh.

Posted
i think he can and will get better he is blowing out people at majors or every tournament in plays in for that matter i think he will continue to win and get better and at least win 2 majors in 07.

Posted
given his first 10 year or even 27 years of continued improvement I see no reason to think this will not continue. Tigers passion and reason for playing are completely different from the rest of the tour and any other golfer. He seems to find a reason to refine and improve his game when it seemingly is unbeatable to anyone else. I would venture to say that Tiger would take his relentless and neverending pursuit of perfection into anything he does. He is a freak....admirable and iconic...but still a freak.
Regardless...to answer your question....I see no letup in Tigers pursuit of getter better.


love

P. Mickelson

Posted
Yes, he can definitely get more consistent with his Driver. But the amount he can improve is probably limited compared to most people. After age 35 he will start to need to make adjustments to changes in his body, not much at first, but as hard as he swings I have to blieve he will devlop some chronic problems.

1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow


  • Administrator
Posted
Yes, he can definitely get more consistent with his Driver. But the amount he can improve is probably limited compared to most people. After age 35 he will start to need to make adjustments to changes in his body, not much at first, but as hard as he swings I have to blieve he will devlop some chronic problems.

He did change his swing the last time in large part to help him avoid any chronic problems. He's incredibly fit, too.

Remember, he had surger on his left knee because he used to "snap" it pretty hard. His last swing change was as much about fixing that problem, some say, as anything else. If other golfers can last 30 years without too many major injuries, I think the fittest golfer of them all can do it, too. That said, Tiger does have less ROOM to improve than most golfers, but more ability to do so, too. So while he may be 90% there, and most other pros at 80%, it'll be easier for him to get to 95% than most other pros to get to 85%, I believe. (Percentages completely made up, yes... but for the sake of argument, assume 50% gets you on the PGA Tour, and 100% is hitting every shot just about roughly how you want it - perfect is not possible, after all. )

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Tom Watson said if he had 3-5 shots a round exactly as he envisioned it was good round....

I think Ben Hogan said something similar as well, and it's true. I hit two good golf shots today, and I otherwise played so so. But those two shots are what bring me back - the chance to hit three next time. Or four!

Which is why I defined my percentages as "hitting a shot roughly how you wanted it." I left in room for small error.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
If he does, he will win everything he enters and that might get a might boring down the road.

Golf is not a game, it's a way of life!

Driver...Cubic Balance offset
Fairway wood......Flying Saucer
3-Wood....Cleveland LauncherIrons.......Callaway Great Big Bertha w/graphite shaftswedges....Cleveland sand wedge, Callaway Lob wedge putter....Claveland VAS.


Posted

rembrandt wrote:

If he does, he will win everything he enters and that might get a might boring down the road.

....I think that there is a consipracy in place on the Tour. See....after Tiger goes on his (2) year slaughter of winning majors, he has agreed with the PGA to re-vamp his swing so as to allow Phil, Rateif, and Shawn Makiel types to win a few over this period. This aleviates the boring factor. Once Tiger becomes restless and people start talking about Phil as the next dominant player, he returns with a vengence. I'm going back to my den now as some of the tin foil is starting fall down off the walls and ceiling.....;)

Posted
Of course Tigers going to get better. You look at any professional athlete that was #1 in their respective sport or playing position. They got better and better as the years went along. Until they reached that plateau. Examples are Michael Jordan, Jack Nicklaus, Jeff Gordan, Jerry Rice. These are just a few. These athletes dominated their sport or playing position. They got better and better. So will Tiger Woods. He's dominating golf, he's breaking records and setting them. He will surpass Jack's records and you know what? He will get better.

Note: This thread is 7078 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 22 - 2026-01-11 More mirror work. Back outdoors tomorrow.
    • Day 11, 1/11/26.  Today was putting, along about 6' of carpet, with coins on the ground to keep me cognizant of what I'm doing.  I think this is the at-home drill from LSW. (Ugh, missed two of the last four days -- 1/10 and 1/8)
    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.