Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5741 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Anyone out there currently hitting this driver? I was able to hit several balls into a launch monitor against my current driver (R7 425 TP - 85g shaft) and was hoping to be blown away. I tested a 8.5 degree, 65g R9 TP with stock weight configuration.

In the end, I felt the new R9 lacked the solid feeling of the R7 TP. Ball speed and launch angle were similar, with a bit of improvement in RPM. Overall distance was less than my current driver.

Any thoughts from others?

In the Bag: TaylorMade R11 TP - TaylorMade R7 TP TS - Cleveland Halo - TM TP 2009 3-PW - Vokey SM 52 - Vokey SM 60 - Rife Barbados CS - ProV1x 


On the Computer:  Analyzr Pro 
 


Posted
I hit this driver not long ago, got the rep to build me the club that would suit me best, was at a driving range with a launch mointer.

I got fitted for a TP 7.5 Fubki fubuki shaft, he told me this was the combo that was going to work best for me. Still i did not like this driver, it lacked felling and the sound was horrible!

Taylormade gear is becoming a joke now, new gear every 3 months or less, it's dumb! If anything the clubs are getting worse, the 425 quad tp was the best driver I ever hit, burnner was still good, but diddent have that "wow" factor, the new driver is again a downgrade of the burner.

I used to be a big fan of taylormade gear, not so much anymore!

Driver: 909D3 8.5* Diamana White Board X
3 Wood: MP 630 15* GRAFALLOY PROLAUNCH RED X
Hybrid: 909H 19* "Real" VooDoo X
3 - P: MP-68 KBS Tour Black Nickel X
56* 10 Wedge Vr60* 06 Wedge: VrPutter: Custom Made.Golf Ball: TOUR B330SI am the greatest, I said that even before I knew I was....


Posted
I agree with you on the feel and the sound... and yes, it seems Taylormade spits out a new driver as often as the tabloids spin new issues... Talk about a short product life cycle, it's pretty ridiculous. Thanks for reaffirming my love for my 425 TP. Looks like it's going to get refinished and stay in the bag for a while.

In the Bag: TaylorMade R11 TP - TaylorMade R7 TP TS - Cleveland Halo - TM TP 2009 3-PW - Vokey SM 52 - Vokey SM 60 - Rife Barbados CS - ProV1x 


On the Computer:  Analyzr Pro 
 


Posted
I just got fitted for my Taylor Made stuff last night, have to say don't think thers much difference between the supertri and "old" R9 stuff. I did like it though got the 9.5 with X in the 60g shaft, it really seemed to bore through the wind and there was a lot last night! I used to have a superquad but wasn't overly impressed with it apart from the flight of the ball. the super tri is as close as you will get to it looks wise though.

Posted
I hit it...

... Loved the look of it, but didn't love the feel it gave me.

:cleveland:         Classic 10.5° w/ Miyazaki C.Kua Limited X-Stiff
:cleveland:         Launcher FL 3 Wood 17° w/ Miyazaki C. Kua Stiff
:cleveland:         Mashie 3H 20.5° w/ Miyazaki C. Kua Stiff
:mizuno:   MP-57 4 - PW w/ Dynamic Gold S300
:cleveland:         588 - 52° 56° 60°
:scotty_cameron:          Studio Newport 2
:srixon:              Z-Star Tour Yellow 


Posted
I just recently hit both the R9 Supertri TP and last year's R9 TP, I preferred last year's R9 TP and ended up buying it. I used to hit an R7 425 TP.

The feel of the Supertri wasn't horrible, but it just wasn't quite all there, if that makes sense.

Posted
I used to be taylormade every time but now im changing rapidly over to titleist because they make good equiptment

Posted
I agree. For whatever reason, the supertri doesn't come through the ball as solidly as other TM drivers.

In the Bag: TaylorMade R11 TP - TaylorMade R7 TP TS - Cleveland Halo - TM TP 2009 3-PW - Vokey SM 52 - Vokey SM 60 - Rife Barbados CS - ProV1x 


On the Computer:  Analyzr Pro 
 


Note: This thread is 5741 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Mike Mentzer Was Right: The Science, Logic, and Legacy of Heavy Duty Training - Mike Mentzer Modern science backs Mike Mentzer’s one-set-to-failure training. Discover why Heavy Duty works, and how logic, intensity, and recovery lead to real results. Is this what you mean? If so, I have known bodybuilders to do this and they were very strong.
    • Wordle 1,652 3/6* ⬛⬛🟦⬛🟦 ⬛🟧🟧⬛⬛ 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
    • Wordle 1,652 X/6* 🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩 ⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩 Yup - one of those Wordle moments….
    • The term I hear most often is "double teeing" which means the course/club has starting times from both the #1 and #10 tee.  I have encountered this many times and we know if we are the first group off #10, we may well get to #1 and have to wait because there are groups still with tee times yet to tee of #1.  In most instances, where the course/club has a starter, he normally explains this situation.  In this case, the pro advised what you would could/would encounter making the turn to #1.  And, that is exactly what happened.  Probably would have been wise to talk to the pro after playing back 9 and ask when you could go off #1 since apparently that club does not double tee.   Regardless, the outburst towards the other group was uncalled for.  And, I don't blame the member for being upset.  As a member of a private club, you are responsible for the actions of your guest.  I have played many times as a guest in the UK and I am pretty damn sure my host was responsible for my actions while at the club.  I know at the clubs I have belonged to here in the US, that is the way it is.  As a matter of fact, the member may find himself being brought before management and facing possible suspension.  So, I don't blame him for being upset.  However, as the host, he really should have stepped up and put a stop to the OP's actions.  OP makes this statement "I now understand that standards are different on the "private course." But I'll take those lessons to the muni, too."  No, the standards are not different.  You, sir, seem to be just a bit hard headed and belligerent, even if you are college professor...which possibly explains a lot.   JMHO
    • Day 32: worked for about 10 minutes on my drill. Filmed it as well for a check in. I think it’s slightly better but still seeing some issues. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.