Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6865 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Alright, thanks to the forum members info and advice, I've finally updated to more modern technology with the driver. The 460cc head makes a BIG difference.

My question for you guys is about 3-wood technology. How much has it improved in the past 5-10 years? I'm currently playing the original Callaway Great Big Bertha (1996?) and notice that although it's easy to hit, it does seem to balloon a little bit and lacks feedback...doesn't have the real visceral feel and shots off the toe or sweet spot feel almost the same.

How much of an improvement are modern 3-woods over what I'm playing in terms of feel, distance, trajectory, and ability to be played off the deck? I've tried the old Titleist 975f and it was great off the tee, but impossible off the grass. Also demo'ed Sonartec (NP-99, SS-03, and SS-02) and they were LONG off the tee, ok off the deck, but felt pretty hard (I'm guessing my swing speed is in the low to mid 90's, best round this year 6 over, average mid-low 80's, always played a fade).

Saw a nice review on the Titleist 904f on this site and I also can trade for a TM V-steel with a TT DG R300 shaft. Any opinions/experience on these two woods, and possibly how they compare to what I'm playing? Does the titanium 3-wood (ruger titanium, trivia freaks?) vs. a steel 3-wood have any difference in performance? ...or, should I just stick with what I have?

Order of importance: forgiveness, feel, off the deck-ability, trajectory (mid), and the "go-to-club" factor...distance isn't so important, but would be nice!

Thanks in advance, this is the last club trade of the year, I swear I swear!

Driver: FT-5 Tour 8.5* neutral
3 wood: TEE CB1 15*
Irons (3-PW): Nike forged blades
SW: Sonartec T35 proto 54*
LW: Sonartec T35 proto 58*Putter: Yes! Tracey


Posted
I can suggest the r7 woods from taylor made.. newest technology max core and great shaft.. the vsteel are nice I have one. I would suggest getting a different shaft for the v steel though

Driver: Taylor Made R7 425 9.5° TP Stiff
Fairway: Taylor Made V-Steel #3 w/Fujikura Rombax Stiff
Irons: Taylor Made rac LT 4-PW shaft; Rifle Flighted 6.0
Wedges: Tayor Made rac 52° 56° 60°Utility: Taylor Made Rescue TP #3 (Aldila NV Hybid 85g Stiff)Putter: Scotty...


Posted
thanks for the suggestion aquacooled...

never even considered the R7 as it's way out of my budget.

What do you like and dislike about your V-steel? I can get a 15* V-steel with a TT Dynamic Gold steel shaft for a direct swap on my GBB.

Just wondering if I should go with a graphite shaft instead.

Also considering a Cleveland Launcher Titanium 3-wood...

Driver: FT-5 Tour 8.5* neutral
3 wood: TEE CB1 15*
Irons (3-PW): Nike forged blades
SW: Sonartec T35 proto 54*
LW: Sonartec T35 proto 58*Putter: Yes! Tracey


Posted
I really dont dislike anything on the v steel other then the shaft (the ball flies too high) check my sig for shaft..

the reason I switch back to the vsteel is because I it the v steel better from the fairway then the r7 but when I tee the ball the r7 is perfect..

I would go with a graphite shaft for the fairway wood, and cleveland also make great clubs.. really all the big names make good stuff..

goodluck

Driver: Taylor Made R7 425 9.5° TP Stiff
Fairway: Taylor Made V-Steel #3 w/Fujikura Rombax Stiff
Irons: Taylor Made rac LT 4-PW shaft; Rifle Flighted 6.0
Wedges: Tayor Made rac 52° 56° 60°Utility: Taylor Made Rescue TP #3 (Aldila NV Hybid 85g Stiff)Putter: Scotty...


Posted
just picked up a sonartec, a lil difficult to hit and not at all forgiving. but very very workable golf club. makes me miss my R7 ti... and that being said, i would go with an R7 ti 3 wood it macthes exactly what you are looking for.

my 2 pennys

Posted
I just picked up a King Cobra Comp 3 wood and love it, haven't hit it off a tee too much, but it's great off the deck...
Posted
The Callaway Steelhead series was a big hit a few years ago. The latest version of this club is called the Callaway X Fairway Wood. I find the 3 Wood easy to hit off the tee, as well as the fairway. You can buy them relatively inexpensively from an eBay seller. I bought mine, with the stock Fujikura graphite shaft, new for $139.00. That was a few months ago; they may be cheaper now. Good luck.

shortgame85
In the Bag:
Driver: :TaylorMade: RBZ 9.5 Reg Flex
3 Wood :TaylorMade: RBZ Reg Flex
Hybrid: Ping G25 Hybrids 17*, 20*, 23*

Irons:Ping G25 5-Gap Wedge, Sr Flex, Vokey 56.14 Spin Mill NS Pro Reg, Flex

Putter: Bobby Grace Center Shaft 32"


Posted
Thanks for the info fellas...

BTW, what is a R7 fairway wood going for new and used now-a-days?

I swapped the Great Big Bertha (10 years old) and paid $60 for an almost new Callaway Fusion 4 wood with the NVS shaft. Pretty good deal that I couldn't pass up.

I'm praying that this is it and forever will be (HAHAHHA!!! NEVER!!!), but will let you guys know. The Callaway X looked good too, as well as Launcher titanium and comp, and Titleist 904f.

Any of you guys just play a strong lofted hybrid in place of a 3-wood? Tried the Sonartec MD last year and loved the low trajectory, but didn't know how to hit it off the deck. After I sold it I read it's supposed to be hit like a 5-iron?

Ok, R7 and X are on the list...Thanks!

Driver: FT-5 Tour 8.5* neutral
3 wood: TEE CB1 15*
Irons (3-PW): Nike forged blades
SW: Sonartec T35 proto 54*
LW: Sonartec T35 proto 58*Putter: Yes! Tracey


Note: This thread is 6865 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,499 3/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Birdied #7 and #17 at the home course today. #7 is new, #17 is not.
    • Wordle 1,499 5/6 ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟩 ⬜⬜🟨⬜🟩 ⬜⬜⬜🟩🟩 ⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • In the old days, pre-2020, "playing to your handicap" meant a net score about equal to the Course Rating.  that led to problems when people played against each other from different tees, people playing tees with a lower CR would generally shoot lower scores.  Course Handicaps were adjusted for each competition to make it even, usually lowering the course handicap for the "forward tee" players. So now if you "play to your handicap", the (68.4-72) term means your score will be even par, no matter which tees you play from.  No adjustment needed for people playing from different tees.  Look at your example, the guy shoots 82 every time, his Course Handicap of 10 gives him an even par net score every time.
    • Wordle 1,499 3/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...