Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Seriously, how can Tiger drive it so poorly?


Note: This thread is 5678 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I am no swing coach, but I think Tiger always had some minor fundamental flaws. I think he was gifted with the athleticism to swing through those flaws for many years, and he had that undeniable determination to beat everyone silly. The guy has the mentality of assassin on the golf course. I have never seen anyone like him, not even Jack.

How old ARE you? I read old an golf magazine article where Jack refused to vote in their poll for best player in each category (driving, irons, putting, bunker play, etc.). He refused since you couldn't vote for yourself and even if you could, you had to vote for a different player in each category. In his opinion he was the best player in several categories. On any given Sunday, he was right.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
How old ARE you? I read old an golf magazine article where Jack refused to vote in their poll for best player in each category (driving, irons, putting, bunker play, etc.). He refused since you couldn't vote for yourself and even if you could, you had to vote for a different player in each category. In his opinion he was the best player in several categories. On any given Sunday, he was right.

Im 52 and have watched Jack since the late 60's. Jack in my opinion, is the best long iron player of all time, and probably the best clutch putter I have ever seen. His course management needs no mentioning..... nobody came close. His short game was "iffy" at times.... but good enough.

I was refering to Tiger's mentality, not his game compared to Jack's. Jack would often just let everyone around him fold up on thier own. Tiger's game has always been more provocative in the sense that he not only wanted them to fold, but he wanted to demoralize them as well.

  • Moderator
Posted
Im 52 and have watched Jack since the late 60's. Jack in my opinion, is the best long iron player of all time, and probably the best clutch putter I have ever seen. His course management needs no mentioning..... nobody came close. His short game was "iffy" at times.... but good enough.

I thought Johnny Miller was the greatest iron player of all time.......

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I thought Johnny Miller was the greatest iron player of all time.......

For a brief time he was, but then again Nick Price, Nick Faldo, Ray Floyd, Tiger Woods, and many other can say that.

BTW - he said long irons - even though Hogan is famous for one particular 1-iron shot, there's noone who holds a candle to Nicklaus with a long iron, not even Watson.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
I thought Johnny Miller was the greatest iron player of all time.......

Iron play has generally been broken into 3 catagories. Long-middle-short

Johhny was good in his heyday.

  • Moderator
Posted
For a brief time he was, but then again Nick Price, Nick Faldo, Ray Floyd, Tiger Woods, and many other can say that.

Iron play has generally been broken into 3 catagories. Long-middle-short

I was being sarcastic.

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I was being sarcastic.

I suspected 63 you were, but 63 thought maybe 63 all of his 63 brainwashing on 63 Sundays was 63 working.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


  • Moderator
Posted
I suspected 63 you were, but 63 thought maybe 63 all of his 63 brainwashing on 63 Sundays was 63 working.

Haha!!! I better stop reading that or it will brain wash me!

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Tiger's average driving distance for 2009 was just a hair under 300 yard and he was T21 in driving distance. He isn't listed in 2010, probably has not played enough. But the tour average is 286.9 yards (per the PGATOUR web site) and that includes drives not in the fairway. As to who dominates the tour only two of the top ten in driving distance appear in the top ten in scoring average. I believe Tiger himself said in a press interview at one time that hitting fairways was not that important if you carried the drive far enough. I suppose that is true if you keep it in play. I would suspect that GIR is a more important statistic.

Well I think that not being in the fairway is definitely important in major championships, where you get punished for being in the rough. There are times when you can get away with it where you are lucky enough to be in the intermediate cut or caught a good lie and your miss has to give you a good angle to the pin. He definitely is one of the longer hitters just like Phil or Ernie maybe not the longest in terms of statistical driving distance but if you look at the top 5 on the money list those guys are all capable of putting it out there 300+ yards when they need to. The par 5s is where they feast on for these guys and separates them from the herd. That's part of the reason Tiger has moved away from a softer ball to regain the advantage he used to have in distance.


Note: This thread is 5678 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Agreed - only 5 players better than -4. Not quite alarm bells are ringing time just yet.
    • I don't really care what the winning score is. The best players still generally bubble up to the top. Also, second is three back. It's not like there are ten people within two shots of the lead.
    • Are these course getting easier? are the players getting better? should we not worry about tournaments that used to produce single digit winners are now producing course records year after year.  I am not talking roll back I am just curious why scores are so much lower than five to ten years ago. 
    • I've posted plenty of positive things about Tiger over the years. I just like to play fair.  But if you want to see me praise TW some more here you go: 12 wins by 7 shots or more - Jack had 4 3 separate win streaks of 5 or more in a row - Jack won 3 in a row once It took Jack 172 more events and 9 extra years to reach Tiger's 71 wins by 2009 TW is the only player since 1900 to win a major by double digits and he did it twice 30% peak win rate is even higher than the previous record holder Ben Hogan (25%) 11 time PGA Tour Player of the year - Jack had 5 12 times lead the Tour in wins - Jack 6 10 times money list leader - Jack 8 Jack officially has 73 wins, but 2 of them are team wins with Arnie. You could argue he should be listed with 71 and I wouldn't disagree. 
    • I mean that's clearly an opinion.  The funny thing is I never even attacked Tiger, I just pointed out that the other poster had a point when he mentioned that Jack had a longer career. Tiger basically had 5 years when he could have been winning more tournaments if not for his injuries. 2010-2011 and then again 2015-2017. Hard to make the argument after his final win because not many players win a ton after age 43.  If those numbers support the fact that Jack had a longer career so be it. Don't take that as an affront to Tiger. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.