Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 7168 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I've seen all three uses. 1020 seems most common. Wishon uses 304. And there have been brass wedges that claim great feel (at one time many putters were brass).

The only clubfitting book that seems to mention it is Summitt/Jackson; and they say it makes no difference.

What are the advantages of each? Which do you play?

Thanks,

David
In my bag:
Dynacraft Prophet 12° Neutral Driver, SK Fiber Lite Revolution I A-flex shaft
Dynacraft Prophet 16° 3W and 19° 5w, , SK Fiber Tour Trac 80 A-flex shafts
Dynacraft Prophet 23° & 26° Hybrids, SK Fiber ZTri Tec A-flex shafts
Golfsmith HS300 irons 5-9, pw, aw 26°-50° with...

Posted
feel and cost is the difference.. when it feels better then it usually costs more.. Brass I wouldnt try changing loft or lie with them..

Driver: Taylor Made R7 425 9.5° TP Stiff
Fairway: Taylor Made V-Steel #3 w/Fujikura Rombax Stiff
Irons: Taylor Made rac LT 4-PW shaft; Rifle Flighted 6.0
Wedges: Tayor Made rac 52° 56° 60°Utility: Taylor Made Rescue TP #3 (Aldila NV Hybid 85g Stiff)Putter: Scotty...


Posted
I've seen all three uses. 1020 seems most common. Wishon uses 304. And there have been brass wedges that claim great feel (at one time many putters were brass).

DavidNJ,

As aquacooled mentioned, there are differences in feel between all the different metals used. Carbon steels are typically the softest according to the Rockwell Hardness Scale, with 8620 and 1020 being very close together. However, carbon steels are typically less durable than stainelss steel applications. Stainless are typically harder, but have much better durability. Most stainless alloys are too brittle to be forged which is why you typically see them in cast applications. The exception being 17-4 and 410 which is used in clubs like the Titleist 755. If you're a range rat, I'd strongly consider a stainless set for the durability aspects alone. Berillium Copper was a very common alloy used in the past since it is very soft, yet is still very durable. However, its use is prohibited in the golf industry these days due to EPA restrictons on the use of Berillium which is carcinogenic when airbore. From a pure performance aspect, it makes no differnece. You are still hitting a white ball with a piece of metal. However, there is a bit of a difference in feel, but not neccissarily one which isn't influenced just as much by club design than by material used. Don't get too caught up in the hype between all the different metals used and the forged versus cast debate. There are stainelss Ping clubs which feel just as soft as the carbon steel Mizunos I've played.

Note: This thread is 7168 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm good with the bunkers, and the fairways are SUPER wide. Three yards should stop a ball that isn't landing in it from rolling into the hay.
    • I'm a little behind, but I just finished listening to the episode about practicing while on vacation.  I have two vacations coming up this month that I won't be bringing golf clubs with me on, and this was perfectly timed (I'm sure I am not the only one going on vacation in June).   Especially the part about stretching.  I keep putting off adding stretching, with golf in mind, to my daily routine.  I think I'm going to use these upcoming vacations, the first of which I'm flying off to on Thursday, as a way to get into this habit.   For anyone else interested, Fit For Golf (see sidebar) has fantastic stretching routines (some of which, I think, are on their free area).  I really should get back to doing their main exercises too.  I don't have any affiliation with them beyond "satisfied customer," in case that sounds like an ad. I may end up posting in the 5 minutes thread when I do golf stretches if it's my only practice that day... as if I don't already sound like a broken mp3 with my 10-15 minutes hitting indoors part. And back to the topic:  anyone not caught up on the podcast should consider catching up and listen to that episode, especially if you're going on a non-golf vacation this summer and want some practice ideas that aren't the at-home practice routine from LSW about long bunker shots (which I am sure we all do regularly).
    • Mostly pull cuts to slices. Some random pull draw/hooks pending of I hit the toe. 
    • What's the rest of that story? Where was the ball going?
    • The criticisms are starting already 🤣 U.S. Open pro criticizes Shinnecock green conditions: 'Bumpy' After playing his first practice round at the 2026 U.S. Open, Michael Kim offered a less-than-glowing review of Shinnecock's "bumpy" greens.   The sand, I don't care about that. If the greens didn't come back as well for latest aerification, that would be a bit of a blunder on Shinnecock I think.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.