Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5455 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm debating whether adding a 56* sand wedge to my bag would be worth it.  I currently have a 48* PW, a 52* AW, and a 60* LW.

Never had a sand wedge and it would bring my set to a complete 14.  Is it worth it?  You guys all know well that it ain't free. :P


Posted

Might not be the wedges you would play, but the Adams set I got were only $9 each. Given that I would def. add a 56* to round out your bag. If you are looking at Vokeys or something similar then I would just step back and ask yourself when/if you could have used a 56 in the past several rounds. I use to use my 52 for chipping and 60 for bunkers but I like having a 56 to split the gap for approaches.


Posted

I find it rather difficult to hit 70%-90% distance shots with wedges.  Its FAR easier to hit a full wedge (realizing that a full wedge is an 80% swing) then one where you have to "take something off or hit it out of your shoes."

The sand wedge fills the gap between the lob and gap wedge.  I also use my 4 wedges in the bag for difficult pitches around the green.  Each wedge goes a specific height and roll depending on the shot I need with the same swing.  I use all my wedges alot!!

Driver Callaway Diablo Edge --- Custom Sonartec 3, 5 and 7 woods made +1" stiff shafts --- Irons 5-L Ping G10 +1" 4.5* upright reg shafts --- ---Putter Tiger Shark


Posted


Originally Posted by tws1098

Might not be the wedges you would play, but the Adams set I got were only $9 each. Given that I would def. add a 56* to round out your bag. If you are looking at Vokeys or something similar then I would just step back and ask yourself when/if you could have used a 56 in the past several rounds. I use to use my 52 for chipping and 60 for bunkers but I like having a 56 to split the gap for approaches.


Luckily, I'm only looking to spend around 45 dollars on a used Nike VR wedge.  Well, I haven't played in months because of the weather, but I got very tired of trying to pinpoint control half-swing attack wedges.


Posted


Originally Posted by adamgoodman

Quote:

Originally Posted by tws1098

Might not be the wedges you would play, but the Adams set I got were only $9 each. Given that I would def. add a 56* to round out your bag. If you are looking at Vokeys or something similar then I would just step back and ask yourself when/if you could have used a 56 in the past several rounds. I use to use my 52 for chipping and 60 for bunkers but I like having a 56 to split the gap for approaches.

Luckily, I'm only looking to spend around 45 dollars on a used Nike VR wedge.  Well, I haven't played in months because of the weather, but I got very tired of trying to pinpoint control half-swing attack wedges.



Yeah that gets old, when my 60* was left behind and then someone took it my short game suffered.  On the bright side I learned to chip with my 52 and am much much better with it.  It is nice to have a 60* back though because I was money with it from 80 yards which I always seem to find myself at on those 350 to 380yd par 4s.


Posted



Quote:
Originally Posted by tws1098 View Post



Quote:
It is nice to have a 60* back though because I was money with it from 80 yards which I always seem to find myself at on those 350 to 380yd par 4s.



Is anyone else doing this math?



Quote:
Originally Posted by 596 View Post

I find it rather difficult to hit 70%-90% distance shots with wedges.  Its FAR easier to hit a full wedge (realizing that a full wedge is an 80% swing) then one where you have to "take something off or hit it out of your shoes."

The sand wedge fills the gap between the lob and gap wedge.  I also use my 4 wedges in the bag for difficult pitches around the green.  Each wedge goes a specific height and roll depending on the shot I need with the same swing.  I use all my wedges alot!!

More wedges might lower your score right away, but fewer wedges in the bag can make you a better player.



Quote:
Originally Posted by adamgoodman View Post

Never had a sand wedge and it would bring my set to a complete 14.  Is it worth it?  You guys all know well that it ain't free. :P


And you got down to a 4.8? Stellar!! May I suggest dumping the 52 in favour of a 54* SW ? You'll never go back.

Edit: or, get the 56, have your 52 bent to a 50, and the leave the PW at home.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted

umm what math? that is a 270-300 yd drive...nothing outrageous


Posted


Originally Posted by tws1098

umm what math? that is a 270-300 yd drive...nothing outrageous



I didn't say there was. Stretch your range a couple degrees on either side and I'm right there with you.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted

If you've been playing consistent rounds under 80, you should know where your strokes are coming from and what gaps cost you the most.

I play most approach shots within 125 yards with a PW, 52 or 60.  The 56 has higher bounce and is most useful in thick rough and sand.

In the Bag: TaylorMade R11 TP - TaylorMade R7 TP TS - Cleveland Halo - TM TP 2009 3-PW - Vokey SM 52 - Vokey SM 60 - Rife Barbados CS - ProV1x 


On the Computer:  Analyzr Pro 
 


Posted

ok then.

anyway, to the OP, good luck and I think Sean is right about going with a 54*. It would make sense and you can sell the 52 to make some of the money toward the 54. I considered going 54 and 58 myself but got a good deal on a full set.


Posted

You should get yourself a SW that has a different bounce from your other wedges, for different lies. So if you have a low bounce LW and GW, get a higher bounce SW for soft turf and fluffy sand. I think that would round out your bag.


Note: This thread is 5455 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
    • Day 23 - 2026-01-12 Finally outdoors again with 10 minutes of 7 iron work in the net. Also mirror work. Excited to get back on the range tomorrow and maybe do some film.
    • Day 10: 2026.01.12 Hit 25 balls at the range, working on rotating right hip during backswing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.