Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5365 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm actually more of a fan of metal spikes than I am of soft spikes for a couple reasons.

1. If it's soft conditions soft spikes leave a lot of indentations and leave spike marks on the green where anyone has walked. Metal spikes usually pull clean and if you pay attention you tap down your own spike marks.

2. Shoes with metal spikes gave you better footing plus you didn't have to change spikes a lot unlike soft spikes.

People dragging their feet whether it's soft spikes or metal is ignorant and tears up the green either way. If all soft spikes were like the ecco street premiere you probably would have less issues with greens but the footing wouldn't be nearly is as good. During summer months if the course lets there greens really dry out then soft spikes would probably better than metal. I guess next time your playing look around the cup where every puts a lot of weight on one leg to pick up their ball you will see a ton of marks. Again this is just my opinion...

Driver: i15, 3 wood: G10, Hybrid: Nickent 4dx, Irons: Ping s57, Wedges: Mizuno MPT 52, 56, 60, Putter: XG #9 

Posted


Originally Posted by clubchamp

I'm actually more of a fan of metal spikes than I am of soft spikes for a couple reasons.

1. If it's soft conditions soft spikes leave a lot of indentations and leave spike marks on the green where anyone has walked. Metal spikes usually pull clean and if you pay attention you tap down your own spike marks.

2. Shoes with metal spikes gave you better footing plus you didn't have to change spikes a lot unlike soft spikes.

People dragging their feet whether it's soft spikes or metal is ignorant and tears up the green either way. If all soft spikes were like the ecco street premiere you probably would have less issues with greens but the footing wouldn't be nearly is as good. During summer months if the course lets there greens really dry out then soft spikes would probably better than metal. I guess next time your playing look around the cup where every puts a lot of weight on one leg to pick up their ball you will see a ton of marks. Again this is just my opinion...


Agree. What I have noticed is that some people twist their feet on the green, for whatever strange reason. This twisting leaves terrible marks on the surface, such marks were never seen during the steel spike era.

Soft 'spikes' are good only for walking indoors and on asphalt. Then again, on those surfaces one rarely needs to take one's stance, so why on earth did this soft 'spike' revolution begin in the first place?? Could it be possible that the enormous business of manufacturing and selling these softies compared to that of steel spikes has got anything to do with it...? I used to have spikes made of hardened steel and they lasted for many years. Current softies last for maximum 10 rounds. Good business for someone.


Posted

If they made the greens hard enough you'd never see a footprint. Bay Hills' greens looked soft as sand! Too many courses have shit, soft greens. They gotta firm under foot!


Posted


Originally Posted by Lofty Lefty

If they made the greens hard enough you'd never see a footprint. Bay Hills' greens looked soft as sand! Too many courses have shit, soft greens. They gotta firm under foot!



I thought that bay hills greens were to hard. no one could stick it.

golf is a lot like life. the more you enjoy it, the better off you are. a3_biggrin.gif
 
 


Note: This thread is 5365 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 430 - 2025-12-04 Slow motion backswings (with chippy shots) with AlmostGolf balls.
    • Day 24 (4 Dec 25) - Spent about an hour working with the new 55° wedge in the backyard.  Kept all shots to under 20yds.  Big focus - not decelerating thru downswing and keeping speed up with abbreviated backswing.  Nothing like hitting a low flighted chip with plenty of check spin and then purpose to float a pitch of similar distance.  
    • Day 114 12-4 Put some work in on backswing, moving the hips correctly, then feeling over to lead side. Didn't hit any balls was just focused on keeping flowy and moving better. I'll probably do another session tonight and add in some foam balls.
    • Didn't say anything about your understanding in my post.  Well, if you are not insisting on alignment with logic of the WHS, then no.  Try me/us. What do you want from us then?? You are not making sense. You come here and post in an open forum, question a system that is constructed with logic, without using any of your own and then give us a small window of your personal experience to support your narrative which at first sight does not makes sense.  I mean, if you are a point of swearing then I would suggest you cut your losses and humor a more gullible audience elsewhere. Good heavens.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.