Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

i need to replace my callaway warbird 3 wood. and i need everyone at "the trap" for ideas.


Note: This thread is 5284 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

If you are looking for a longer 3 wood than I'd have to agree with those saying TE Exotics... it is the one that constantly comes up when people are looking for a bit more distance with a fairway wood...  From what I've heard, you may also want to consider one of the new Adams F11 fairways... I've heard that they are pretty long too, especially the Ti model.

I just replaced my own 3 wood with a Willson Staff FYbrid 3 wood and I love the thing... I don't really hit it out of tight lies though, just mainly off the tee.

Tristan Hilton

My Equipment: 
Titleist TSR2 Driver (Fujikura Pro 2.0 TS; 10.5°) · PXG 0211 FWs (Diamana S+ 60; 15° and 21°) · PXG 0211 Hybrid (MMT 80; 22°) · Edel SMS Irons (SteelFiber i95; 5-GW) · Edel SMS Pro Wedges (SteelFiber i110; 56°, 60°) · Edel Classic Blade Putter (32") · Maxfli Tour Ball · Pinned Prism Rangefinder · SuperStroke Grips · Flightscope Mevo · TRUE Linkswear Shoes · Vessel Player V Pro 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by tristanhilton85

If you are looking for a longer 3 wood than I'd have to agree with those saying TE Exotics... it is the one that constantly comes up when people are looking for a bit more distance with a fairway wood...  From what I've heard, you may also want to consider one of the new Adams F11 fairways... I've heard that they are pretty long too, especially the Ti model.

I just replaced my own 3 wood with a Willson Staff FYbrid 3 wood and I love the thing... I don't really hit it out of tight lies though, just mainly off the tee.

this post hit me pretty deep haha I'm an AVID wilson staff fan and ive only been playing for about a year. I just recently bought my first set of irons built for my height/lie/and specific shaft (ns pro 950gh) i ended up buying the FG tour irons 3-p. realize that all the talk about 3 irons being useless is 100% true so 4-pw has made the game incredibly enjoyable.

But i was looking at getting the standard 19.5 version as a replacement for my warbird 5 wood but the clubtest on golf.com mentioned both fairway wood and hybrid didn't stand out in any category. Forgiving, yet only feels solid at contact. I wish i would've pulled the trigger on a 13 3wood and a 19.5...not a tight lie club though?

ST-230 Max 9.5*, Hzrdus Smoke Blue RDX 6.0

ST-G 5-Wood 17*, Kai'Li Blue 70g Stiff

Adams Tight Lies II 19*, KBS Tour Graphite Prototype 85g Stiff

Wilson Staff D9 Forged 5i, DG105 VSS Pro Stiff (stock replacement for 4i)

Wilson Staff FG Tour (2009) PW-5i, DG S300 +1"/2*Up, 6.0 Freq

Mizuno S23, 52* and 56*, KBS Hi-Rev 2.0 115g

Callaway Mac Daddy PM Grind 60*, KBS Tour-V

TaylorMade Ardmore 3 TP Patina (left-handed)

 


Posted


Originally Posted by handlez42

this post hit me pretty deep haha I'm an AVID wilson staff fan and ive only been playing for about a year. I just recently bought my first set of irons built for my height/lie/and specific shaft (ns pro 950gh) i ended up buying the FG tour irons 3-p. realize that all the talk about 3 irons being useless is 100% true so 4-pw has made the game incredibly enjoyable.

But i was looking at getting the standard 19.5 version as a replacement for my warbird 5 wood but the clubtest on golf.com mentioned both fairway wood and hybrid didn't stand out in any category. Forgiving, yet only feels solid at contact. I wish i would've pulled the trigger on a 13 3wood and a 19.5...not a tight lie club though?



He said "out of tight lies" Perhaps he meant "out of the rough" since hitting a 3-wood "off of" tight lies is best done with the one you're replacing - the warbird soleplate (assuming we're not talking about hardpan).

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted


Originally Posted by sean_miller

He said "out of tight lies" Perhaps he meant "out of the rough" since hitting a 3-wood "off of" tight lies is best done with the one you're replacing - the warbird soleplate (assuming we're not talking about hardpan).

i heard the fybrid heavy sole was exceptional out of the rough lies because of the dual rails...unless he isnt referring to the HS version?

warbird is decent out of rough and not bad off the tight lies...just not long enough

ST-230 Max 9.5*, Hzrdus Smoke Blue RDX 6.0

ST-G 5-Wood 17*, Kai'Li Blue 70g Stiff

Adams Tight Lies II 19*, KBS Tour Graphite Prototype 85g Stiff

Wilson Staff D9 Forged 5i, DG105 VSS Pro Stiff (stock replacement for 4i)

Wilson Staff FG Tour (2009) PW-5i, DG S300 +1"/2*Up, 6.0 Freq

Mizuno S23, 52* and 56*, KBS Hi-Rev 2.0 115g

Callaway Mac Daddy PM Grind 60*, KBS Tour-V

TaylorMade Ardmore 3 TP Patina (left-handed)

 


Posted

ST-230 Max 9.5*, Hzrdus Smoke Blue RDX 6.0

ST-G 5-Wood 17*, Kai'Li Blue 70g Stiff

Adams Tight Lies II 19*, KBS Tour Graphite Prototype 85g Stiff

Wilson Staff D9 Forged 5i, DG105 VSS Pro Stiff (stock replacement for 4i)

Wilson Staff FG Tour (2009) PW-5i, DG S300 +1"/2*Up, 6.0 Freq

Mizuno S23, 52* and 56*, KBS Hi-Rev 2.0 115g

Callaway Mac Daddy PM Grind 60*, KBS Tour-V

TaylorMade Ardmore 3 TP Patina (left-handed)

 


Posted



If it's as solid as it looks, then you've done well!

Originally Posted by handlez42

pics



Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted


Originally Posted by sean_miller

If it's as solid as it looks, then you've done well!

its a beautiful club but soo far very hard for me to control...its gonna take a bit of time to get used to. EXPLOSIVE off the face though i just push it hard right. well, slice it really.


ST-230 Max 9.5*, Hzrdus Smoke Blue RDX 6.0

ST-G 5-Wood 17*, Kai'Li Blue 70g Stiff

Adams Tight Lies II 19*, KBS Tour Graphite Prototype 85g Stiff

Wilson Staff D9 Forged 5i, DG105 VSS Pro Stiff (stock replacement for 4i)

Wilson Staff FG Tour (2009) PW-5i, DG S300 +1"/2*Up, 6.0 Freq

Mizuno S23, 52* and 56*, KBS Hi-Rev 2.0 115g

Callaway Mac Daddy PM Grind 60*, KBS Tour-V

TaylorMade Ardmore 3 TP Patina (left-handed)

 


Posted

The shallower face of the TEE (which results in - or maybe is the result of - a lower center of gravity for the club) should help you get the ball up better and, hopefully, that'll lead to more carry and better distance than that old Warbird.  Good luck!

:tmade: SLDR 12* :ping: G20 4W :adams: Speedline Super S 4H :mizuno: JPX-825 Pro 4-G :tmade: ATV 56* & 60* :cameron: 2014 Select Newport or 1997 Teryllium 3 Newport


Posted
Originally Posted by handlez42

i heard the fybrid heavy sole was exceptional out of the rough lies because of the dual rails...unless he isnt referring to the HS version?

warbird is decent out of rough and not bad off the tight lies...just not long enough



Originally Posted by sean_miller

He said "out of tight lies" Perhaps he meant "out of the rough" since hitting a 3-wood "off of" tight lies is best done with the one you're replacing - the warbird soleplate (assuming we're not talking about hardpan).



I suppose I should clarify.  With the 3 wood, I mainly just hit it off the tee... I use it a lot on short par 4s.  I don't hit it off of the fairway very often, and yes it is good out of the rough (it is the HS version) but I don't use it from there much either... usually if I'm in rough and I need that kind of distance still it's smarter for me to break the shot into two.  I do have the FYbrid hybrids (3 & 4) also, and I do use those off the fairway and out of rough quite a bit and I really do love those as well.

Tristan Hilton

My Equipment: 
Titleist TSR2 Driver (Fujikura Pro 2.0 TS; 10.5°) · PXG 0211 FWs (Diamana S+ 60; 15° and 21°) · PXG 0211 Hybrid (MMT 80; 22°) · Edel SMS Irons (SteelFiber i95; 5-GW) · Edel SMS Pro Wedges (SteelFiber i110; 56°, 60°) · Edel Classic Blade Putter (32") · Maxfli Tour Ball · Pinned Prism Rangefinder · SuperStroke Grips · Flightscope Mevo · TRUE Linkswear Shoes · Vessel Player V Pro 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by handlez42

its a beautiful club but soo far very hard for me to control...its gonna take a bit of time to get used to. EXPLOSIVE off the face though i just push it hard right. well, slice it really.

Exotics gets great reviews off the tee, but it's not the best from the deck.  I had the original Exotics and could not get comfortable-- did not like the balance of the club.  It's been mentioned but I'll add the G15 and R9 as easy to hit shallow woods.  I use my woods from mostly the fairway and rough, and those two performed nicely.  If you're looking for a bargain wood, go with the original Hibore.  The sole cuts thru tall grass and the club is forgiving without the gigantic size.   And as with all clubs, find the right shaft.


Posted


Originally Posted by minty7890

Exotics gets great reviews off the tee, but it's not the best from the deck.  I had the original Exotics and could not get comfortable-- did not like the balance of the club.  It's been mentioned but I'll add the G15 and R9 as easy to hit shallow woods.  I use my woods from mostly the fairway and rough, and those two performed nicely.  If you're looking for a bargain wood, go with the original Hibore.  The sole cuts thru tall grass and the club is forgiving without the gigantic size.   And as with all clubs, find the right shaft.

i'll have to a agree this CB2 15deg is one of the best woods off the tee in the game of golf. and i'm sure the ones in front of it are newer exotics models.

had a tough short par 4 that had a fairway angling to the left and a landing zone of about 180 out. TALLL trees on the left. grabbed my r9 460 and instantly thought to myself, "i dont think i can get this one up high enough" and went back and reluctantly grabbed the CB2. cleared the hugeeee trees and still went about 250 leaving a 60deg wedge 1hop. next time i tee'd it off was on a par five into a blind downhill right bend. i struggled keeping this thing straight before this particular round so i swung it almost carelessly in order to bend it around the trees in the direction the fairway was moving, almost like a rocket, low tour-like trajectory. felt like tiger with his low cut/stinger he used to shoot. in my mind i feel as if i purposefully did it haha but anybody can dream right?

BUT off the tight lies this club is tough. leading edge isn't really designed to get low and close to the ball. also, the sole is incredibly smooth and rounded. unlike the clubs with glide rails or "V" soles.

Most of this i believe is due to the swing weight being much heavier, i could be almost pulling up or holding up to not bottom out early.

all in all i think i can figure this thing out, and crush it. but until i get more range sessions under its belt, i'll be sticking to my nike procombo hybrid/driving iron shenanigans. keep it in the short grass longer.

ST-230 Max 9.5*, Hzrdus Smoke Blue RDX 6.0

ST-G 5-Wood 17*, Kai'Li Blue 70g Stiff

Adams Tight Lies II 19*, KBS Tour Graphite Prototype 85g Stiff

Wilson Staff D9 Forged 5i, DG105 VSS Pro Stiff (stock replacement for 4i)

Wilson Staff FG Tour (2009) PW-5i, DG S300 +1"/2*Up, 6.0 Freq

Mizuno S23, 52* and 56*, KBS Hi-Rev 2.0 115g

Callaway Mac Daddy PM Grind 60*, KBS Tour-V

TaylorMade Ardmore 3 TP Patina (left-handed)

 


Note: This thread is 5284 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.