Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4833 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I used to have one of those Moe Norman swing until recently I started experimenting with new swing and came across this method that one of my golf buddy taught me. He said during setup, let my arms drop down naturally when gripping the club. After that, move the arms and hands as close to the body as possible prior to upswing. On the downswing, return to the same position meaning my arms almost touching my chess and my hands almost touch my legs. I tried it and was amazed that it improved my striking accuracy dramatically and I can hit the sweetspot 9/10 times. There is a downside to this as my swing arc is smaller now, it is harder for me to hit those monster drive but what I get in return is amazing accuracy. I guess the distance will improve once I get confident with this swing. Anyone has tried this? I shot a low 80 in the last round with this method and I'm very excited about it.

  • 1 year later...
Posted

I have had good results from making a conscious effort to keep my arms close to my body at setup.  Like all good golf habits, I tend to forget to do it and revert back to bad habits.  I find that my back swing is more on plane and vertical without trying when I set up with my arms close to my body.  I feel like it's easier to hit the ball on a descending blow on the downswing when the backswing is more vertical.  All-in-all, I believe that keeping your arms closer to your body is probably better that further away, but everyone is different.  I don't think there is right or wrong when it comes to golf.  Like Tiger has said in the past, do whatever works consistently for you.  Moe Norman's swing is very different from Ben Hogan's swing, but they are arguably the best ball strikers to ever play the game.


Note: This thread is 4833 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.