Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast!
IGNORED

Mizuno MP-57 Iron Set 3-PW

rdwoody

By rdwoody
in Marketplace

 Share
Note: This thread is 5413 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

rdwoody Well Established Member

rdwoody

Posted
Posted

Up for trade is a set of Mizuno MP-57 irons in very good condition. The irons are standard length and lie with Dynamic Gold S300 shafts. The grips are stock Golf Pride Mizuno branded M-21. The grips are like new and have 99% of their life left in them. The grooves on the irons are all in great shape and there is no browning on any of the faces. The irons have a bit of bag chatter and the regular dings in the sole due to the soft forged metal. The picture of the face is the PW, which is by far the worst looking face. I really like these irons, but I prefer the look and feel of pure blades. The shafts are also a little too much for my deliberate iron swing, so I'm looking for a set of blade irons with regular flex shafts.

As far as trades I'm open to, I like Mizuno MP-14, MP-33, and MP-29 if you have a set in similar condition to the MP-57s. I'd also take a set of TN-87 if anybody wants to let go of some of those

I'm also looking for Bridgestone J33B or J36B, Srixon Pro-100, Nike Forged blades (I prefer the VR TW blades over the old forged blades, but I'll consider either).

Certain models of Hogan blades, MacGregor blades , and Maxfli Australian blades will do the job as well.

If you have any other irons you think I may be interested in, offer away. I'm willing to add or accept cash as appropriate for the deal. Thanks for looking!


CJL Established Member

CJL

Posted
Posted

Not sure if you have any interest, but I have a set (3-PW) of Tour Edge Exotics CNC Forged Blades that I would consider trading.  They have KBS stiff shafts in them but I thought I'd throw it out there for your consideration.  Feel free to email or simply reply with any questions.

R7 Superquad

Exotics 18*

Exotics 25*

AP2 (2008)

CG15 56* & 60*

Rossa Imola 8

TP Black LDP
 


rdwoody Well Established Member

rdwoody

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I thank you very much for the offer, but I'm holding out for a set of muscleback irons with regular shafts.


 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up

  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).

  • Posts

    • coachjimsc
      Wordle Daily Puzzle

      By coachjimsc · Posted

      Wordle 1,811 4/6 ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Ty_Webb
      Dean Knuth's Blog Post on the WHS

      By Ty_Webb · Posted

      Couple of things. In the UK they play a lot of stableford competitions. 2 points for a net par, 1 for a bogey, 3 for a birdie, 4 for an eagle, 0 for a double bogey or worse. Playing to your handicap typically means getting 36 points, being 18 x 2 points. If your course rating is a long way different from par, then playing to your handicap would mean getting 32 points or 40 points or some such. I wouldn't be at all surprised if that input from the R&A is the reason for the CR-Par adjustment, which brings it to 36 points is playing to your handicap. A round of net pars really should be playing to your handicap. Now it is. Yay. I would think the people most likely to be upset about the CR-Par adjustment would be 6 or 7 indexes whose course is par 72, with a 74/140 rating. 6.5 x 140/113 + 74 - 72 = 10. So the "single figure" golfer who has probably defined himself that way for a long time is now a 10 and getting double digit strokes. Oof. I must admit I'm a 0.0 right now (sure makes the math easy) and if I play Bethpage Black from the blues, suddenly I'm a 7. That takes a little bit of getting used to. It also means I do have to pay attention to the stroke indices to be sure of whether I'm making the net double bogey adjustment properly.  I do think it's much less likely that NDB is applied properly vs the old system where it was max double bogey or max 7 depending on handicap (I think anyway - I know it was max double bogey at my handicap level - I didn't much care about where it changed or what it changed to). NDB is clearly better, but it does mean people either have to adjust it themselves accurately (questionable) or input their hole by hole scores (also questionable). I do it, because I care about it (and don't tend to make too many scores worse than double and also rarely play courses where I'm giving strokes back to the course and would therefore have max bogey on some holes). I'm sure there are many who don't and will just guess or assume. Under the old system, if I was playing a scratch tournament (which is most of my golf), I didn't care what my course handicap or stroke allocations were. They didn't affect my posted scores at all. Now they do (although the MGA and LIGA post all scores at their events themselves directly - something I am very happy about). That is a complication under the new system - one I think is worth it given the benefits, but a complication all the same.
    • DeadMan
      Wordle Daily Puzzle

      By DeadMan · Posted

      Wordle 1,811 4/6 ⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • StuM
      Russell Henley

      By StuM · Posted

      Good analogy Stinky 😜
    • iacas
      Wordle Daily Puzzle

      By iacas · Posted

      Wordle 1,811 4/6* 🟩⬛⬛⬛⬛ 🟩⬛⬛🟨🟨 🟩🟩⬛🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

  I accept